Determining lower limits of detection of digital PCR assays for cancer-related gene mutations

Synergy

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 8-22

  Milbury, Coren A ^a   Zhong, Qun ^a   Lin, Jesse ^a   Williams, Miguel ^a   Olson, Jeff ^a   Link, Darren R ^a   Hutchison, Brian ^a  

^a RainDance Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

Assay sensitivity; Digital PCR; EGFR L858R; EGFR T790M; Limit of detection; Mutation detection

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; GENOMIC DNA;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LINEARITY; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; POINT MUTATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TUMOR GENE;

EID: 84921830313     PISSN: 22137130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2014.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mullis K.F.F., Scharf S., Saiki R., Horn G., Erlich H. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1986, LI:263-273.
2. Taly V., Pekin D., Abed A.E., Laurent-Puig P. Detecting biomarkers with microdroplet technology. Trends Mol Med 2012, 18(7):405-416. 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.05.001.
3. Taly V., Pekin D., Benhaim L., Kotsopoulos S.K., Le Corre D., Li X., et al. Multiplex picodroplet digital PCR to detect KRAS mutations in circulating DNA from the plasma of colorectal cancer patients. Clin Chem 2013, 59(12):1722-1731. 10.1373/clinchem.2013.206359.
4. Chen W.W., Balaj L., Liau L.M., Samuels M.L., Kotsopoulos S.K., Maguire C.A., et al. BEAMing and droplet digital PCR analysis of mutant IDH1 mRNA in glioma patient serum and cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicles. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2013, 2:e109. 10.1038/mtna.2013.28.
5. Ladanyi M., Pao W. Lung adenocarcinoma: guiding EGFR-targeted therapy and beyond. Mod Pathol 2008, 21(2):3801018.
6. Bell D.W., Gore I., Okimoto R.A., Godin-Heymann N., Sordella R., Mulloy R., et al. Inherited susceptibility to lung cancer may be associated with the T790M drug resistance mutation in EGFR. Nat Genet 2005, 37(12):1315-1316.
7. Pohl G., Shih L.-M. Principle and applications of digital PCR. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2004, 4(1):41-47.
8. Dube S., Qin J., Ramakrishnan R. Mathematical analysis of copy number variation in a DNA sample using digital PCR on a nanofluidic device. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(8):e2876. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002876.
9. Heyries K.A., Tropini C., Vaninsberghe M., Doolin C., Petriv O.I., Singhal A., et al. Megapixel digital PCR. Nat Methods 2011, 8(8):649-651.
10. Motulsky H.J. Intuitive biostatistics 2009, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA. 2nd ed.
11. Box G.H., Hunter W.G., Hunter J.S. Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building 1978, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
12. National Institute of Standards and Technology Engineering Statistics Handbook 2012, Available from: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmc/section3/pmc331.htm.
13. Wittwer DNA Lab uCount for Digital PCR: University of Utah 2013, Available from: https://www.dna.utah.edu/ucount/uc.php.
14. Pezzullo J.C. Exact Binomial and Poisson Confidence Intervals 2014, Available from: http://statpages.org/confint.html.
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Protocols for determination of limits of detection and limits of quantitation, approved guideline 2004, CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, Contract No.: EP17.
16. Armbruster D.P.T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev 2008, 29(Suppl. 1):S49-S52.
17. Linnet K., Kondratovich M. Partly nonparametric approach for determining the limit of detection. Clin Chem 2004, 50(4):732-740. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029983.
18. Currie L. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl Chem 1995, 67(10):1699-1723.
19. Keohavong P., Thilly W.G. Fidelity of DNA polymerases in DNA amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86(23):9253-9257.