Management alternatives in national park areas: The case of ilgaz mountain national park

Eco.mont

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 37-44

  Öztürk, Sevgi ^a   Ayan, Sezgin ^a  

^a KASTAMONU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AHP technique; Alternative management models; Ilgaz mountain national park

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921755515     PISSN: 2073106X     EISSN: 20731558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1553/eco.mont-7-1s37     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adomowicz, W., J. Louviere & M. Williams 1994. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271-292.
2. Akman, Y. 1990. Climate and Bio-climate (Bio-climate Methods and Turkey Climates). Ankara.
3. Akpidotlessnar, N. 1995. A research on: The utilisation possibilities of fuzzy set technics during the evaluation of post mining lands application alternatives. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications 1430 (793): 38.
4. Ayan, S., N. Akpidotlessnar, S. Öztürk, N. Belkayalidotless, H. Şevik, A. Kalaycidotless, S. Acar & C. Berber 2009. The evaluation of the management alternatives of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. International Conference on Plants and Environmental Pollution (ICPEP-2009). Erciyes University 6-11 July 2009. Kayseri, Turkey.
5. Aydidotlessnözü, D., Ü. I˙bret & M. Aydidotlessn, 2012. Analysis of Terrain Usage in Kastamonu-Ilgaz Mountain National Park, Journal of Marmara Geography 26: 108-123.
6. Babaeinesami, A. & F. Abdi 2012. Comparison and Grade Analysis Of The Effective Criteria in Organizational Learning by Hierarchical Analysis (AHP). African Journal of Business Management 6 (9): 3181-3187.
7. Başal, M. 1998. Naturalgas-Yapracik Facilities Land Use Planning. Scientific Investigations and Researches: 602. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Individual Researches Publication 1104.
8. Gan, C. & E.J. Luzar 1993. A Conjoint Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25: 36-45.
9. Holmes, T., K. Alger, C. Zinkhan & E. Mercer 1998. The Effect of Response Time on Conjoint Analysis Estimates of Rainforest Protection Values. Journal of Forest Economics 4 (1): 7-28.
10. Holmes, T., C. Zinkhan, K. Alger & E. Mercer 1996. Conjoint Analysis of Nature Tourism Values in Bahai Brazil. The Forestry Private Enterprise Initiative Working Paper 57: 19.
11. Hyberg, B.T. 1987. Multi Attribute Decision Theory and Forest Management: A Discussion and Application. Forest Science 33: 835-845.
12. Kastamonu Provincial Directorate of Culture and Tourism 2012. Ilgaz Mountain National Park Tourism Facilities Bed Capacities Data. Kastamonu, Turkey.
13. Kuter, N. 2000. Assessment of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Terms of Forest Landscape and Aesthetics. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Forestry 1: 36-47. Isparta.
14. Liang, G.S. 1999. Fuzzy MCDM Based on Ideal And Anti-Ideal Concepts. European Journal of Operational Research. 112: 682-691.
15. LTDP 2008. Long Term Development Plan of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. Analysis Scrutiny Report. Kastamonu.
16. Mackenze, J. 1993. A Comparison Of Contingent Performance Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 593-603.
17. Matnews, K.E., F.R. Johnson, R.W. Dunford & W.H. Desvousges 1995. The Potential Role Of Conjoint Analysis In Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Triangle Economic Research Technical Working Paper. G-9503: 1-18.
18. Menteş, I˙. 2001. Investigation and Management of Ilgaz Mountain National Park as a Protected Area. Doctorate Thesis. Black Sea Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology. Trabzon.
19. Morimoto, S. 1999. A Stated Preference Study to Evaluate the Potential for Tourism in Luang Prabang, Laos. Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies, Kobe University. Japan. OpenStreetMap 2014. http://www.openstreetmap. org/#map=11/41.0724/33.8180&layers=QN
20. Öztürk, S. & A. Aydoğdu 2012. Recreational Facilities of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. I. Recreation Researches Congress 611-628. Kemer, Antalya.
21. Özbay, S. 2008. Planning Studies in Nature Protection Areas and Ayvalidotlessk Islands Natural Park Management Plan Proposal. ITU, Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul.
22. Province of Çankidotlessridotless Land Asset 1998. Republic of Turkey, Prime Ministry, General Directorate of Rural Services. Ankara, Turkey.
23. Province of Kastamonu Land Asset 1993. Republic of Turkey, Prime Ministry, General Directorate of Rural Services. Ankara, Turkey.
24. Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarcy Process. New York, McGraw-Hill.
25. Saaty, T.L. 1990. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operations Research 48: 9-26.
26. Saaty, T.L. 1994. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces 24 (6): 19-43.
27. Safari, H. A. Faghih & M.R. Fathi 2012. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method for Facility Location Selection. African Journal of Business Management 6 (1): 206-212.
28. Sayadi, S., M.C. Gonzalez & J. Calatrava 2000. Ranking Versus Scale Rating In Conjoint Analysis: Evaluating Landscapes in Mountainous Regions in Southeastern Spain. Ecological Economics 55 (4): 539-550.
29. Sidotlessvacidotlessoğlu, A., S. Ayan & N. Öner 2007. Effect of Silvicultural Application On The Stand Structure in Fir Forest of Mounts Ilgaz and The Environment. National Environment Symposium. Mersin University.
30. Soil Survey Staff 1999. Soil Taxonomy. A Basic of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Survey. USDA Handbook 436, Washington D.C.
31. Stevens, T.H., R. Belkner, D. Dennis, D. Kittredge & C. Willis 2000. Comparison of Contingent Valuation and Conjoint Analysis in Ecosystem Management. Ecological Economics. 32: 63-74.
32. Suh, Y.K. & W.C. Gartner 2004. Preferences and Trip Expenditures - A Conjoint Analysis of Visitors to Seoul, Korea. Tourism Management 25: 127-137.
33. Şimşek, Z., S. Ünal, M. Yamantaş, Ö. Şahin, M. Tarhanlidotless, Y. Gün, E. Kapdan, M. Uçukoğlu, M.S. Ay & I˙. Yazar 2003. Report on Examination and Assessment of Report of Extraordinary Revenue in Ilgaz Mountain National Park. Kastamonu, Turkey.
34. Teeter, L.D. & A.L. Dyer 1986. A Multi Attribute Utility Model for Incorporating Risk in Fire Management Planning. Forest Science 31: 1032-1048.
35. TÜI˙K (Turkey of Statistical Agency) 2013. Kastamonu and Çankidotlessridotless 2012. Address Based Population Data. UBAK, nd. Internatidotlessonal Road Projects. http:// www.ubak.gov.tr/BLSM_WIYS/UBAK/en/enhtml/ 20090819_142036_204_2_64.html. (accessed 01.09.2014)
36. Ünal, S., A. Sidotlessvacidotlessoğlu, S. Ayan & N. Öner 2007. Storm Turndowns and Entomologidotlesscal Results in Ilgaz Mountain Forests. National Environmental Symposium. Mersin.
37. Zahedi, F. 1986. The Analytic Hierarchy Process - A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces 16: 96-108.
38. Zinkhan, F.C. & T.P. Holmes 1997. Conjoint Analysis: A Preference-Based Approach for The Accounting of Multiple Benefits in Southern Forest Management, Economics of Forest Protection and Management Research Unit, Research Triangle Park. SJAF 21 (4): 180-186.
39. Zinkhan, F.C. & G.M. Zinkhan 1994. An Application of Conjoint Analysis to Capital Budgeting: The Case of Innovative Land Management Systems. Managerial Finance 20 (7): 37-50.