De novo peptide structure prediction: An overview

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1268, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-13

  Thévenet, Pierre ^a   Rey, Julien ^a   Moroy, Gautier ^a   Tuffery, Pierre ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

In silico; Large scale; Soluble peptides; Structural bioinformatics; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE; PEPTIDES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISULFIDE BOND; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; METHODS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION;

FORECASTING;

IN-SILICO; LARGE SCALE; SOLUBLE PEPTIDES; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS; STRUCTURE PREDICTION;

PEPTIDES;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PEPTIDES;

EID: 84921732890     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Williams AD, Shivaprasad S, Wetzel R (2006) Alanine scanning mutagenesis of Abeta(1–40) amyloid fi bril stability. J Mol Biol 357(4): 1283–1294
2. Van Craenenbroeck M, Gregoire F, De Neef P et al (2004) Ala-scan of ghrelin (1–14): interaction with the recombinant human ghrelin receptor. Peptides 25(6):959–965
3. Vanhee P, van der Sloot AM, Verschueren E et al (2011) Computational design of peptide ligands. Trends Biotechnol 29(5):231–239
4. Audie J, Boyd C (2010) The synergistic use of computation, chemistry and biology to discover novel peptide-based drugs: the time is right. Curr Pharm Des 16(5):567–582
5. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z et al (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):235–242
6. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K (2013) CASP prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL. Proteins 82(Suppl 2):7–13
7. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A et al (2000) Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29:291–325
8. Gehrmann J, Alewood PF, Craik DJ (1998) Structure determination of the three disulfi de bond isomers of alpha-conotoxin GI: a model for the role of disulfi de bonds in structural stability. J Mol Biol 278(2):401–415
9. Loening NM, Wilson ZN, Zobel-Thropp PA et al (2013) Solution structures of two homologous venom peptides from Sicarius dolichocephalus. PLoS One 8(1):e54401
10. Conibear AC, Rosengren KJ, Daly NL et al (2013) The cyclic cystine ladder in thetadefensins is important for structure and stability, but not antibacterial activity. J Biol Chem 288(15):10830–10840
11. Duan Y, Kollman PA (1998) Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 282(5389):740–744
12. Zagrovic B, Snow CD, Shirts MR et al (2002) Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwidedistributed computing. J Mol Biol 323(5): 927–937
13. Simmerling C, Strockbine B, Roitberg AE (2002) All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. J Am Chem Soc 124(38):11258–11259
14. Sugita Y, Okamoto Y (1999) Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 314(1–2):141–151
15. Sanbonmatsu KY, Garcia AE (2002) Structure of Met-enkephalin in explicit aqueous solution using replica exchange molecular dynamics. Proteins 46(2):225–234
16. Rhee YM, Pande VS (2003) Multiplexedreplica exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding simulation. Biophys J 84(2 Pt 1):775–786
17. Im W, Brooks CL III (2004) De novo folding of membrane proteins: an exploration of the structure and NMR properties of the fd coat protein. J Mol Biol 337(3):513–519
18. Im W, Brooks CL III (2005) Interfacial folding and membrane insertion of designed peptides studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(19):6771–6776
19. Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K et al (2010) Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330(6002):341–346
20. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO et al (2011) How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334(6055):517–520
21. Vetter I, Davis JL, Rash LD et al (2011) Venomics: a new paradigm for natural products- based drug discovery. Amino Acids 40(1):15–28
22. Ishikawa K, Yue K, Dill KA (1999) Predicting the structures of 18 peptides using Geocore. Protein Sci 8(4):716–721
23. Kaur H, Garg A, Raghava GP (2007) PEPstr: a de novo method for tertiary structure prediction of small bioactive peptides. Protein Pept Lett 14(7):626–631
24. Jones DT (1999) GenTHREADER: an effi - cient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 287(4):797–815
25. Kaur H, Raghava GP (2004) A neural network method for prediction of beta-turn types in proteins using evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 20(16):2751–2758
26. Jayaram B, Bhushan K, Shenoy SR et al (2006) Bhageerath: an energy based web enabled computer software suite for limiting the search space of tertiary structures of small globular proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 34(21):6195–6204
27. Jayaram B, Dhingra P, Lakhani B (2012) Bhageerath-targeting the near impossible: pushing the frontiers of atomic models for protein tertiary structure prediction. J Chem Sci 124(1):83–91
28. Thomas A, Deshayes S, Decaffmeyer M et al (2009) PepLook: an innovative in silico tool for determination of structure, polymorphism and stability of peptides. Adv Exp Med Biol 611:459–460
29. Maupetit J, Derreumaux P, Tuffery P (2009) PEP-FOLD: an online resource for de novo peptide structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Web Server issue):W498–W503
30. Maupetit J, Derreumaux P, Tuffery P (2010) A fast method for large-scale de novo peptide and miniprotein structure prediction. J Comput Chem 31(4):726–738
31. Etchebest C, Benros C, Hazout S et al (2005) A structural alphabet for local protein structures: improved prediction methods. Proteins 59(4):810–827
32. Glick M, Rayan A, Goldblum A (2002) A stochastic algorithm for global optimization and for best populations: a test case of side chains in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(2): 703–708
33. Beaufays J, Lins L, Thomas A et al (2012) In silico predictions of 3D structures of linear and cyclic peptides with natural and nonproteinogenic residues. J Pept Sci 18(1):17–24
34. Camproux AC, Gautier R, Tuffery P (2004) A hidden Markov model derived structural alphabet for proteins. J Mol Biol 339(3): 591–605
35. Tuffery P, Guyon F, Derreumaux P (2005) Improved greedy algorithm for protein structure reconstruction. J Comput Chem 26(5): 506–513
36. Maupetit J, Tuffery P, Derreumaux P (2007) A coarse-grained protein force fi eld for folding and structure prediction. Proteins 69(2): 394–408
37. Thevenet P, Shen Y, Maupetit J et al (2012) PEP-FOLD: an updated de novo structure prediction server for both linear and disulfi de bonded cyclic peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Web Server issue):W288–W293
38. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I et al (1999) Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins Suppl 3:171–176
39. Zhang Y (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9:40
40. Thévenet P, Shen Y, Maupetit J et al (2012) Delivering the native structures of peptides from computer simulations and predicted NMR proton chemical shifts. In: Abstract of 32nd European Peptides Society Symposium, Megaron, Athens, Greece, 2–8 Sept 2012
41. Thevenet P, Tuffery P. submitted
42. Fan C, Cheng S, Sinha S et al (2012) Interactions between the termini of lumen enzymes and shell proteins mediate enzyme encapsulation into bacterial microcompartments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(37): 14995–15000
43. Charlois Y, Lins L, Brasseur R (2011) A new in-silico method for determination of helical transmembrane domains based on the PepLook scan: application to IL-2Rbeta and IL-2Rgammac receptor chains. BMC Struct Biol 11:26
44. Steckbeck JD, Craigo JK, Barnes CO et al (2011) Highly conserved structural properties of the C-terminal tail of HIV-1 gp41 protein despite substantial sequence variation among diverse clades: implications for functions in viral replication. J Biol Chem 286(31): 27156–27166
45. Berges R, Balzeau J, Takahashi M et al (2012) Structure-function analysis of the glioma targeting NFL-TBS.40-63 peptide corresponding to the tubulin-binding site on the light neurofi lament subunit. PLoS One 7(11):e49436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049436, PONE-D-12-10940 [pii]
46. Liu Z, Dominy BN, Shakhnovich EI (2004) Structural mining: self-consistent design on fl exible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affi nity potential. J Am Chem Soc 126(27):8515–8528