Spatial patterns of microbial diversity and activity in an aged creosote-contaminated site

ISME Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2131-2142

  Mukherjee, Shinjini ^a   Juottonen, Heli ^a,d   Siivonen, Pauli ^a   Lloret Quesada, Cosme ^a   Tuomi, Pirjo ^b   Pulkkinen, Pertti ^c   Yrjälä, Kim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b Golder Associates Oy   (Finland)

^c FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTINOBACTERIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PLANCTOMYCETES; PROTEOBACTERIA;

CREOSOTE; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT;

BACTERIUM; BIODIVERSITY; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PROTEOBACTERIA; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIODIVERSITY; CREOSOTE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEOBACTERIA; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 84921651081     PISSN: 17517362     EISSN: 17517370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.151     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ager D, Evans S, Li H, Lilley AK, Van Der Gast CJ. (2010). Anthropogenic disturbance affects the structure of bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol 12: 670-678.
2. Anderson MJ. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26: 32-46.
3. Alexander M. (2000). Aging, bioavailability, and overestimation of risk from environmental pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 34: 4259-4265.
4. Antizar-Ladislao B, Spanova K, Beck AJ, Russell NJ. (2008). Microbial community structure changes during bioremediation of PAHs in an aged coal-tar contaminated soil by in-vessel composting. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 61: 357-364.
5. Arenskötter M, Bröker D, Steinbüchel A. (2004). Biology of the metabolically diverse genus Gordonia. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 3195-3204.
6. Atagana HI, Haynes R, Wallis F. (2006). Fungal bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil: a laboratory scale bioremediation study using indigenous soil fungi. Water Air Soil Pollut 172: 201-219.
7. Bengtsson G, Törneman N, Yang X. (2010). Spatial uncoupling of biodegradation, soil respiration, and PAH concentration in a creosote contaminated soil. Environ Pol 158: 2865-2871.
8. Berry D, Ben Mahfoudh K, Wagner M, Loy A. (2011). Barcoded primers used in multiplex amplicon pyrosequencing bias amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 7846-7849.
9. Bru D, Ramette A, Saby N, Dequiedt S, Ranjard L, Jolivet C et al. (2010). Determinants of the distribution of nitrogen-cycling microbial communities at the landscape scale. ISME J 5: 532-542.
10. Byss M ElhottováD Tr?íska J, Baldrian P.(2008). Fungal bioremediation of the creosote-contaminated soil: influence of Pleurotus ostreatus and Irpex lacteus on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal and soil microbial community compos ition in the laboratoryscale study. Chemosphere 73 1518-1523.
11. Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL et al. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234-242.
12. Cerniglia CE. (1993). Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Curr Opin Biotechnol 4: 331-338.
13. Davis MRH, Zhao F, McGrath SP. (2004). Pollutioninduced community tolerance of soil microbes in response to a zinc gradient. Environ Toxicol Chem 23: 2665-2672.
14. Enwall K, Throbäck IN, Stenberg M, Söderström M, Hallin S. (2010). Soil resou rces influence spatial patterns of denitrifying communities at scales compatible with land management. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 2243-2250.
15. Ettema TJ, Andersson SG. (2009). The a-proteobacteria: the Darwin finches of the bacterial world. Biol Lett 5: 429-432.
16. Fahy A, Lethbridge G, Earle R, Ball AS, Timmis KN, McGenity TJ. (2005). Effects of long-term benzene pollution on bacterial diversity and commu nity structure in groundwater. Environ Microbiol 7: 1192-1199.
17. Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF. (2008). The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science 320: 1034-1039.
18. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB. (2007). Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88: 1354-1364.
19. Fierer N, Jackson RB. (2006). The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 626-631.
20. Foesel BU, Nägele V, Naether A, Wüst PK, Weinert J, Bonkowski M et al. (2014). Determinants of Acidobacteria activity inferr ed from the relative abundances of 16S rRNA transcripts in German grassland and forest soils. Environ Microbiol 16: 658-675.
21. George IF, Hartmann M, Liles MR, Agathos SN. (2011). Recovery of as-yet-uncultured soil Acidobacteria on dilute solid media. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 8184-8188.
22. Gerhardt KE, Huang XD, Glick BR, Greenberg BM. (2009). Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci 176: 20-30.
23. Goovaerts P. (1999). Geostatistics in soil science: state-ofthe-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89: 1-45.
24. Goovaerts P. (1998). Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol Fertility Soils 27: 315-334.
25. Green V, Stott D, Diack M. (2006). Assay for fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity: optimization for soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 693-701.
26. Hamamura N, Olson SH, Ward DM, Insk eep WP. (2005). Diversity and functional analysis of bacterial communities associated with natural hydrocarbon seeps in acidic soils at Rainbow Springs, Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 5943-5950.
27. Hammer ∅ , Harper D, Ryan P. (2009). PAST: paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electronica 4: 9.
28. Harms H, Schlosser D, Wick LY. (2011). Untapped potential: exploiting fungi in bioremediation of hazardous chemicals. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 177-192.
29. Johnsen AR, Schmidt S, Hybholt TK, Henriksen S, Jacobsen CS, Andersen O. (2007). Strong impact on t he polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-degrading community of a PAH-polluted soil but marginal effect on PAH degradation when priming with bioremediated soil dominated by mycobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 1474-1480.
30. Kanaly RA, Harayama S. (2000). Biodegradation of highmolecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by bacteria. J Bacteriol 182: 2059-2067.
31. Kulik N, Goi A, Trapido M, Tuhkanen T. (2006). Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by combined chemical pre-oxidation and bioremediation in creosote contaminated soil. J Environ Manage 78: 382-391.
32. Labbe D Margesin R Schinner F Whyte LG Greer CW.2007 Comparative phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities in pristine and hydrocarboncontaminated Alpine soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59 466-475.
33. Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA, Allen CC. (2 005). Biodegradation and Rhodococcus-masters of catabolic versatility. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16: 282-290.
34. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. (2009). Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 5111-5120.
35. Legendre P, Gallagher ED. (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271-280.
36. Leys NM, Ryngaert A, Bastiaens L, Verstraete W, Top EM, Springael D. (2004). Occurrence and phylogenetic diversity of Sphingomonas strains in soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 1944-1955.
37. Lindstrom JE, Barry RP, Braddock JF. (1999). Long-term effects on microbial communities after a subarctic oil spill. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1677-1689.
38. LingW, Zeng Y, Gao Y, Dang H, Zhu X. (2010). Availability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aging soils. J Soils Sediments 10: 799-807.
39. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime J, Hector A et al. (2001). Biodiversity and ecosyst em functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804-808.
40. Margesin R, Labbe D, Schinner F, Greer C, Whyte L. (2003). Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading microbial populati ons in contaminated and pristine alpine soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 3085-3092.
41. Mueller JG, Chapman PJ, Pritchard PH. (1989). Creosote-contaminated sites. Their potential for bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 23: 1197-1201.
42. Mukherjee S, Heinonen M, Dequvire M, SipiläT, Pulkkinen P, YrjäläK. (2013). Secondary succession of bacterial communities and co-occurrence of phylotypes in oil-polluted Populus rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 58: 188-197.
43. Oorts K, Bronckaers H, Smolders E. (2006). Discrepancy of the microbial response to elevated copper between freshly spiked and long-term contaminated so ils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25: 845-853.
44. Pérez-Pantoja D, Donoso R, AgullóL, Córdova M, Seeger M, Pieper DH et al. (2012). Genomic analysis of the potential for aromatic compounds biodegradati on in Burkholderiales. Environ Microbiol 14: 1091-1117.
45. Philippot L, Andersson SG, Battin TJ, Prosser JI, Schimel JP, Whitman WB et al. (2010). The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonom ic ranks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8: 523-529.
46. Philippot L, Bru D, Saby N, Cuhel J, Arrouays D, Simek M et al. (2009). Spatial patterns of bacterial taxa in nature reflect ecological traits of deep branches of the 16S rRNA bacterial tree. Environ Microbiol 11: 3096-3104.
47. Ramsey PW, Rillig MC, Feris KP, Gordon NS, Moore JN, Holben WE et al. (2005). Relationship between communities and processes; new insights from a field study of a contaminated ecosystem. Ecol Lett 8: 1201-1210.
48. Ringelberg D, Richmond M, Foley K, Reynolds C. (2008). Utility of lipid biomarkers in support of bioremediation efforts at army sites. J Microbiol Methods 74: 17-25.
49. Röling WFM, Ortega-Lucach S, Larter SR, Head IM. (2006). Acidophilic microbial communities associated with a natural, biodegraded hydrocarbon seepage. J Appl Microbiol 101: 290-299.
50. Rousk J, Båath E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG et al. (2010). Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4: 1340-1351.
51. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. (2011). Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One 6: e27310.
52. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB et al. (2009). Introducing mothur: opensource, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communit ies. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537-7541.
53. Silby MW Winstanley C Godfrey SAC Levy SB Jackson RW. 2011 Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35 652-680.
54. Stolz A. (2009). Molecular characteristics of xenobioticdegrading sphingomonads. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81: 793-811.
55. Sturman PJ, Stewart P, Cunningham A, Bouwer E, Wolfram J. (1995). Engineering scale-up of in situ bioremediation processes: a review. J Contam Hydrol 19: 171-203.
56. Törneman N, Yang X, Bååth E, Bengtsson G. (2008). Spatial covariation of microbial commun ity composition and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentration in a creosote-polluted soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 1039-1046.
57. Tuomi PM, Salminen JM, Jø rgensen KS. (2004). The abundance of nahAc genes c orrelates with the 14C-naphthalene mineralization potential in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated oxic soil layers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51: 99-107.
58. Van Der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM. (2008). The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11: 296-310.
59. Van Oss L. (2012). Gebiedsplan Van voormalig productiebos Somerharju. BSc thesis. Hogeschool InHolland, 97 pp.
60. Wessén E, Söderström M, Stenberg M, Bru D, Hellman M, Welsh A et al. (2011). Spatial distribution of ammoniaoxidizing bacteria and archaea across a 44-hectare farm relate d to ecosystem functioning. ISME J 5: 1213-1225.
61. Whyte L, Schultz A, Beilen J, Luz A, Pellizari V, LabbéD et al. (2002). Prevalence of alkane monooxygenase genes in Arctic and Antarctic hy drocarbon-contaminated and pristine soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 41: 141-150.