Long-term noise exposure and the risk for type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

Noise and Health

Volumn 17, Issue 74, 2015, Pages 23-33

  Dzhambov, Angel Mario ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Aircraft noise; meta analysis; noise exposure; quality effects model; traffic noise; type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; NOISE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HUMANS; NOISE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84921642520     PISSN: 14631741     EISSN: 19984030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.149571     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Danaei G, Finucan e MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 countryyears and 2.7 million participants. Lancet 2011;378:31-40.
2. Song C. Occupational Noise Exposure and the Risk of Diabetes, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Cardiovascular Disease [Thesis] University of British Columbia, Vancouver; 2013. Available from: https://www.circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/44177/ubc-2013-spring-song-chaojie.pdf. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 21].
3. WHO. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
4. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1033-46.
5. WHO. Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO/NCD/NCS/99.2); 1999.
6. Levterova BA, Dimitrova DD, Levterov GE, Dragova EA. Instruments for disease-specific quality-of-life measurement in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - a systematic review. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2013;55:83-92.
7. van Dieren S, Beulens JW, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Neal B. The global burden of diabetes and its complications: An emerging pandemic. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010;17 Suppl 1:S3-8.
8. Janghorbani M, Momeni F, Mansourian M. Systematic review and metaanalysis of air pollution exposure and risk of diabetes. Eur J Epidemiol 2014;29:231-42.
9. Sørensen M, Andersen ZJ, Nordsborg RB, Becker T, Tjønneland A, Overvad K, et al. Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and incident diabetes: A cohort study. Environ Health Perspect 2013;121:217-22.
10. Kopke RD, Weisskopf PA, Boone JL, Jackson RL, Wester DC, Hoffer ME, et al. Reduction of noise-induced hearing loss using L-NAC and salicylate in the chinchilla. Hear Res 2000;149:138-46.
11. European Community. Commission Green Paper on Future Noise Policy; 1996. Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/pdf/com-96-540.pdf. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 20].
12. Eriksson C, Hilding A, Pyko A, Bluhm G, Pershagen G, Östenson CG. Long-term aircraft noise exposure and body mass index, waist circumference, and type 2 diabetes: A prospective study. Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:687-94.
13. Heidemann C, Niemann H, Paprott R, Du Y, Rathmann W, Scheidt-Nave C. Residential traffic and incidence of Type 2 diabetes: The German Health Interview and Examination Surveys. Diabet Med 2014;31:1269-76.
14. Suadicani P, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F. Occupational noise exposure, social class, and risk of ischemic heart disease and all-cause mortality - a 16-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38:19-26.
15. Selander J, Nilsson ME, Bluhm G, Rosenlund M, Lindqvist M, Nise G, et al. Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 2009;20:272-9.
16. Rhee MY, Kim HY, Roh SC, Kim HJ, Kwon HJ. The effects of chronic exposure to aircraft noise on the prevalence of hypertension. Hypertens Res 2008;31:641-7.
17. Bainbridge KE, Cheng YJ, Cowie CC. Potential mediators of diabetesrelated hearing impairment in the U.S. population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. Diabetes Care 2010;33: 811-6.
18. Jang TW, Kim BG, Kwon YJ, Im HJ. The association between impaired fasting glucose and noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Health 2011;53:274-9.
19. Gjestland T. The socio-economic impact of noise: A method for assessing noise annoyance. Noise Health 2007;9:42-4.
20. Babisch W. Updated exposure-response relationship between road traffic noise and coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis. Noise Health 2014;16:1-9.
21. Abbott PG, Nelson PM. Converting the UK Traffic Noise Index LA10,18 h to EU Noise Indices for Noise Mapping; 2002. Available from: http://www.google.bg/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web &cd=1&ved=0CB0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.defra.gov. uk%2Fenvironment%2Fquality%2Fnoise%2Fresearch%2Fcrtn%2Fdoc uments%2Fnoise-crtn.pdf&ei=piOpU9fYFMeo0wW8-4CQCg&usg=AFQjCNGAAy-9xmu2g57CInkUFPWJnlGsoA&bvm=bv.69620078, d. bGE. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 20].
22. Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1.
23. Doi SA, Thalib L. A quality-effects model for meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2008;19:94-100.
24. Doi SA, Thalib L. An alternative quality adjustor for the quality effects model for meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2009;20:314.
25. Doi SA. Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores. Clin Med Res 2014.
26. Barendregt JJ, Doi SA. MetaXL User Guide, Version 2.0. Available from: http://www.epigear.com. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 20].
27. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
28. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-58.
29. th International Workshop on Railway Noise, Nagahama, Japan; 18-22 October. 2010. Available from: http://www.google.bg/url?sa=t&rct=j &q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CCcQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.diva-portal.org%2Fsmash%2Fget%2Fdiva2%3A674190 %2FFULLTEXT01.pdf&ei=qZ2lU964Jamj0QW6sIHwAQ&usg=AF QjCNFwXz25K0kjPwsi-r6njj-LRscTBg&bvm=bv.69411363, d.bGQ. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 20].
30. Laussmann D, Haftenberger M, Lampert T, Scheidt-Nave C. Social inequities regarding annoyance to noise and road traffic intensity: Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2013;56:822-31.
31. Baranzini A, Schaerer C, Ramirez JV, Thalmann P. Feel it or measure it. Perceived vs. Measured Noise in Hedonic Models; 2006. Available from: http://www.google.bg/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=we b&cd=2&ved=0CCYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webmeets.com%2Ffiles%2Fpapers%2FEAERE%2F2008%2F776%2Ffeel-it-or-measure-it-EAERE.pdf&ei=iCSpU6YNx9LRBdmrgZAK&usg=AFQ jCNE6z4sWhm1m94P1bTdrxKsd1gkC-A&bvm=bv.69620078, d.bGQ. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 20].
32. McNutt LA, Hafner JP, Xue X. Correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1999;282:529.
33. Babisch W. Health aspects of extra-aural noise research. Noise Health 2004;6:69-81.
34. Babisch W. Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. Noise Health 2008;10:27-33.
35. Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Mozurkewich EL. Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: An empirical example. Contemp Clin Trials 2011;32:288-98.
36. Ndrepepa A, Twardella D. Relationship between noise annoyance from road traffic noise and cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis. Noise Health 2011;13:251-9.
37. Davey J, Turner RM, Clarke MJ, Higgins JP. Characteristics of metaanalyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: A cross-sectional, descriptive analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:160.
38. WHO. Evaluation and Use of Epidemiological Evidence for Environmental Health Risk Assessment. Guideline Document. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2000. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/document/e68940.pdf. [Last cited on 2014 Jun 20].
39. Lloyd C, Smith J, Weinger K. Stress and diabetes: A review of the links. Diabetes Spectr 2005;18:121-7.
40. Dzhambov AM, Dimitrova DD. Chronic noise exposure and testosterone deficiency: Meta-analysis and meta-regression of experimental studies in rodents. Endokrynol Pol (in press).
41. Grossmann M. Low testosterone in men with type 2 diabetes: Significance and treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:2341-53.
42. Ishii EK, Talbott EO, Findlay RC, D'Antonio JA, Kuller LH. Is NIDDM a risk factor for noise-induced hearing loss in an occupationally noise exposed cohort? Sci Total Environ 1992;127:155-65.
43. Fujita T, Yamashita D, Katsunuma S, Hasegawa S, Tanimoto H, Nibu K. Increased inner ear susceptibility to noise injury in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Diabetes 2012;61:2980-6.
44. Kakarlapudi V, Sawyer R, Staecker H. The effect of diabetes on sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:382-6.
45. Siddiqi SS, Gupta R, Aslam M, Hasan SA, Khan SA. Type-2 diabetes mellitus and auditory brainstem response. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2013;17:1073-7.
46. Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Rao C. An updated method for risk adjustment in outcomes research. Value Health 2014;17:629-33.
47. WHO. European Centre for Environment and Health. Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise: Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe. Copenhagen: Regional Office for Europe; 2011.
48. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:940-3.
49. Babisch W, Wölke G, Heinrich J, Straff W. Road traffic noise and hypertension - accounting for the location of rooms. Environ Res 2014;133:380-7.