A comparative effectiveness study of continuous positive airway pressure-related skin breakdown when using different nasal interfaces in the extremely low birth weight neonate

Applied Nursing Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 36-41

  Newnam, Katherine M ^a   McGrath, Jacqueline M ^b,c   Salyer, Jeanne ^d   Estes, Tracy ^e   Jallo, Nancy ^d   Bass, W Thomas ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF THE KING S DAUGHTERS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c Farmington   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nasal CPAP of the neonate; Nasal trauma; Pressure ulcer; Preterm infant nasal skin breakdown; Skin breakdown during nasal CPAP

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; HUMAN; INJURIES; NEWBORN; NOSE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SKIN; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; NOSE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SKIN;

EID: 84921617182     PISSN: 08971897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Courtney S.E., Barrington K.J. Continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation. Clinics in Perinatology 2007, 34:73-92.
2. Davis P.G., Morley C.J., Owen L.S. Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2009, 14:14-20.
3. De Paoli A.G., Davis P.G., Faber B., Morley C.J. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 2008, 1-52. CD002977.
4. do Nascimento R.M., Ferreira A.L., Coutinho A.L., Santos Verissimo R.C. The frequency of nasal injury in newborns due to the use of continuous positive airway pressure with prongs. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 2009, 17:489-494.
5. Fischer C., Bertelle V., Hohlfeld J., Forcada-Guex M., Stadelmann-Diaw C., Tolsa J.F. Nasal trauma due to continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. Archives of Disease in Children, Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2010, 95:F447-F451.
6. Fujii K., Sugama J., Okuwa M., Sanada H., Mizokami Y. Incidence and risk factors of pressure ulcers in seven neonatal intensive care units in Japan: A multisite prospective cohort study. International Wound Journal 2010, 7:323-328.
7. Hodeling M., Fardin S.R., Frieden I.J., Wargon O. Forehead pressure necrosis in neonates following continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatric Dermatology 2012, 29:45-58.
8. Jatana K.R., Oplatek A., Stein M., Phillips G., Kang D.R., Elmaraghy C.A. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and cannula use in the neonatal intensive care unit setting. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2010, 136:287-291.
9. Kopelman A.E., Holbert D. Use of oxygen cannulas in extremely low birthweight infants is associated with mucosal trauma and bleeding, and possibly with coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis. Journal of Perinatology 2003, 23:94-97.
10. Lane A.T., Drost S.S. Effects of repeated application of emollient cream to premature neonates' skin. Pediatrics 1993, 92:415-419.
11. Lund C., Kuller J., Raines D.A., Thomas K.K. Neonatal skin care: Evaluation of the AWHONN/NANN research-based practice project on knowledge and skin care practices. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses/National Association of Neonatal Nurses. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecological and Neonatal Nursing 2001, 30:30-40.
12. Lund C.H., Osborne J.W. Validity and reliability of the neonatal skin condition score. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecological and Neonatal Nursing 2004, 33:320-327.
13. McCoskey L. Nursing Care Guidelines for prevention of nasal breakdown in neonates receiving nasal CPAP. Advances in Neonatal Care 2008, 8:116-124.
14. Melnyk B., Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nurisng & healthcare: A guide to best practice 2011, Philadelphia, Lippencott.
15. Newnam K.M., McGrath J.M., Estes T., Jallo N., Salyer J., Bass W.T. An integrative review of skin breakdown in the preterm infant associated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 2013, 42:508-516.
16. Prosser L.A. Comparative effectiveness and child health. PharmacoEconomics 2012, 30:637-645.
17. Ramanathan R. Nasal respiratory support through the nares: Its time has come. Journal of Perinatology 2010, 30:S67-S72.
18. Rego M.A., Martinez F.E. Comparison of two nasal prongs for application of continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2002, 3:239-243.
19. Ronnestad A., Abrahamsen T.G., Medbo S., Reigstad H., Lossius K., Kaaresen P.I., et al. Septicemia in the first week of life in a Norwegian national cohort of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2005, 115:e262-e268.
20. Shoemaker M.T., Pierce M.R., Yoder B.A., DiGeronimo R.J. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: A retrospective study. Journal of Perinatology 2007, 27:85-91.
21. Squires A.J., Hyndman M. Prevention of nasal injuries secondary to NCPAP application in the ELBW infant. Neonatal Network 2009, 28:13-27.
22. Tricoci P., Allen J.M., Kramer J.M., Califf R.M., Smith S.C. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. Journal of American Medical Association 2009, 301:831-841.
23. Verder H. Nasal CPAP has become an indispensable part of the primary treatment of newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatrica 2007, 96:482-484.
24. Verder H., Bohlin K., Kamper J., Lindwall R., Jonsson B. Nasal CPAP and surfactant for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome and prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Acta Paediatrica 2009, 98:1400-1408.
25. Yong S.C., Chen S.J., Boo N.Y. Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study. Archives of Disease in Children, Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005, 90:F480-F483.