Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve distinctions on salient dimensions

Cognitive Science

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 212-226

  Silvey, Catriona ^a   Kirby, Simon ^a   Smith, Kenny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attentional learning; Cultural transmission; Iterated learning; Language and conceptualization; Language evolution; Word meaning

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84921603234     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12150     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S. (2002). Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 948-957.
4. Caldwell, C. A., & Smith, K. (2012). Cultural evolution and perpetuation of arbitrary communicative conventions in experimental microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807.
5. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64(1), 1-37.
7. Clark, E. V., & Amaral, P. M. (2010). Children build on pragmatic information in language acquisition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 445-457.
8. Cornish, H. (2011). Language adapts: Exploring the cultural dynamics of iterated learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
9. Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L., & Swoboda, N. (2010). The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 351-386.
10. Geeraerts, D. (2009). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11. Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J. (2005). Relational categories. In W. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 151-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Keil, F. C. (1994). Explanation, association, and the acquisition of word meaning. Lingua, 92, 169-196.
13. Kelemen, D., & Bloom, P. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge in simple categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 390-395.
14. Kemler Nelson, D. (1995). Principle-based inferences in young children's categorization: Revisiting the impact of function on the naming of artifacts. Cognitive Development, 10(3), 347-380.
15. Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(31), 10681-10686.
16. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99(1), 22-44.
17. Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(4), 1153-1169.
18. Markman, E. M. (1994). Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition. Lingua, 92, 199-227.
19. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207-238.
20. Perfors, A., & Navarro, D. (2011). Language evolution is shaped by the structure of the world: An iterated learning analysis. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 477-482). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
21. Reali, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2009). The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111(3), 317-328.
22. Regier, T. (2005). The emergence of words: Attentional learning in form and meaning. Cognitive Science, 29, 819-865.
23. Sandhofer, C. M., & Smith, L. B. (2001). Why children learn color and size words so differently: Evidence from adults' learning of artificial terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 600-617.
24. Smith, L. B., Colunga, E., & Yoshida, H. (2010). Knowledge as process: Contextually-cued attention and early word learning. Cognitive Science, 34, 1287-1314.
25. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13(1), 13-19.
26. Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. (2006). An attentional learning account of the shape bias: Reply to Cimpian and Markman (2005) and Booth, Waxman, and Huang (2005). Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1339-1343.
27. Smith, K., Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2013). Linguistic structure is an evolutionary trade-off between simplicity and expressivity. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1348-1353). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
28. Smith, K., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition, 116(3), 444-449.
29. Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 308-312.
30. Theisen-White, C., Kirby, S., & Oberlander, J. (2011). Integrating the horizontal and vertical cultural transmission of novel communication systems. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 956-961). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
31. Tomasello, M. (2000). The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics, 10(4), 401-413.
32. Voiklis, J., & Corter, J. E. (2012). Conventional wisdom: Negotiating conventions of reference enhances category learning. Cognitive Science, 36(4), 607-634.
33. Waxman, S. R., & Kosowski, T. D. (1990). Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers' and preschoolers' word-learning biases. Child Development, 61, 1461-1473.
34. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114(2), 245-272.