Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 285-292

  do Carmo, G C ^a   Jafari, J ^b   Sifrim, D ^b   de Oliveira, R B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Esophagus; High resolution manometry; Normal values; Position

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; BRAZILIAN; BRITISH CITIZEN; CONTRACTILE FRONT VELOCITY; DISTAL CONTRACTILE INTEGRAL; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS PARAMETERS; ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SANDHILL UNISENSOR HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; SITTING; STANDING; SUPINE POSITION; SWALLOW (BIRD); SWALLOWING; TOPOGRAPHY; UNITED KINGDOM; UPPER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; ESOPHAGUS; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PERISTALSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; DEGLUTITION; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PERISTALSIS; POSTURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921598834     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12501     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kessing BF, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high resolution manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2012; 14: 197-205.
2. Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak P, Brasseur JG, Ghosh S, Thumshirn M, Fried M, Schwizer W. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 533-42.
3. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 27-37.
4. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl. 1): 57-65.
5. Pandolfino JE, Gosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290: G1033-40.
6. Pandolfino JE, Sifrim D. Evaluation of esophageal contractile propagation using esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl. 1): 20-6.
7. Shi Y, Xiao Y, Peng S, Lin J, Xiong L, Chen M. Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 1611-5.
8. Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Normal values for high- resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25: 762-e579.
9. Babaei A, Mittal RK. Cardiovascular compression of the esophagus and spread of gastro-esophageal reflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 45-51.
10. Sears VW Jr, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35: 857-64.
11. Roman S, Damon H, Pellissier P, Mion F. Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: 271-5.
12. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 509-e198.
13. Iwakiri K, Sugiura T, Kotoyori M, Yamada H, Hayashi Y, Nakagawa Y, Kawakami A, Kobayashi M. Effect of body position on lower esophageal sphincter pressure. J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 305-9.
14. Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodème F, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: e509-16.
15. Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21: 796-806.
16. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek M, Kahrilas PJ. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G878-85.
17. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut 2008; 57: 405-23.
18. Zhang X, Xiang X, Xie X, Hou X. Esophageal motility in the supine and upright positions for liquid and solid swallows through High-resolution manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19: 467-72.
19. Tutuian R, Elton JP, Castell DO, Gideon RM, Castell JA, Katz PO. Effects of position on oesophageal function: studies using combined manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003; 15: 63-7.
20. Niebisch S, Wilshire CL, Peters JH. Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high-resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26: 651-60.
21. Weijenborg PW, Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Normal values for solid-state esophageal high-resolution manometry in a European population; an overview of all current metrics. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 654-9.
22. Kahrilas PJ, Peters JH. Evaluation of the esophagogastric junction using high resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24(Suppl. 1): 11-9.
23. Pandolfino JE. Uncovering hidden information in achalasia using esophageal pressure topography. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 681-4.