Impact Assessments: A Useful Tool for ‘Better Lawmaking’ in EU Migration Policy?

Whose Freedom, Security and Justice?: EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 109-148

  Toner, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921567609     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. S Peers, ‘Transforming Decision-making on EC Immigration and Asylum Law’ (2005) 30 ELRev 283.
2. N Lee and C Kirkpatrick, ‘A Pilot Study on the Quality of European Commission Extended Impact Assessments’, Impact Assessment Research Centre Working Paper 8, Oct 2004
3. N Lee and C Kirkpatrick, ‘Evidence-based Policy-making in Europe: an Evaluation of European Commission Integrated Impact Assessments’ (2006) 24(1) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 23
4. A Meuwese, Informing the EU Legislator through Impact Assessments
5. G Mather and F Vibert, City Research Series from the European Policy Forum: No 2, Reducing the Regulatory Burden: The Arrival of Meaningful Regulatory Impact Analysis (July 2004)
6. C Opoku and A Jordan, ‘Impact Assessment in the EU: a Global Sustainable Development Perspective’, paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimension of Global Environmental Change, Berlin, Dec 2004
7. Wilkinson et al, For Better or Worse? The EU’s ‘Better Regulation’ Agenda and the Environment (London/ Brussles, Institute for European Environmental Policy, 2005)
8. C Radaelli, ‘The Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practice or Lesson- Drawing? (2004) 43 European Journal of Political Research 723.
9. C Radaelli, ‘Getting to Grips with Quality in the Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Assessment in Europe’ [2004] Public Money and Management 271 (Oct).
10. Franco Frattini’. The group apparently was first due to meet before the Sept 2006 Council Meeting.
11. European Union Committee, Human Rights-Proofing EU Legislation, 16th Report of Session 2005–06, HL Paper 67.
12. European Commission, Guide on Impact Assessment Activities in Justice, Freedom and Security Policy Areas (Brussels, European Commission, Sept 2006).
13. Brouwer, ‘Data Surveillance and Border Control in the EU: Balancing Efficiency and Legal Protection’ in T Balzacq and S Carrera (eds), Security vs Freedom, a Challenge for Europe’s Future (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005)
14. P De Hert, W Scheurs and E Brouwer, ‘Machine-Readable Identity Documents with Biometrical Data in the EU—Critical Observations’ Keesings Journal of Documents and Identity (2006, forthcoming).
15. N Coleman, ‘From Gulf War to Gulf War—Years of Security Concern in Immigration and Asylum Policies at European Level’ in A Baldaccini and E Guild (eds), Terrorism and the Foreigner: A Decade of Tension Around the Rule of Law in Europe (Leiden, Brill, 2007)
16. E Guild, ‘Protection, Threat and Movement of Persons— Examining the Relationship of Terrorism and Migration in EU Law after 11 September 2001’ in F Crepeau et al (eds), Forced Migration and Global Processes: A View from Forced Migration Studies (Lexington, Mass, Lexington Books, 2005)