The effect of spatial frequency on peripheral collinear facilitation

Vision Research

Volumn 107, Issue , 2015, Pages 146-154

  Maniglia, Marcello ^a,b   Pavan, Andrea ^c   Trotter, Yves ^a,b  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collinear facilitation; Lateral interactions; Near periphery of the visual field; Spatial frequency tuning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLLINEAR FACILITATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL VISION; SPATIAL FREQUENCY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; VISUAL THRESHOLD; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921474221     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Banks M.S., Sekuler A.B., Anderson S.J. Peripheral spatial vision: Limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1991, 8:1775-1787.
2. Bolz J., Gilbert C.D. The role of horizontal connections in generating long receptive fields in the cat visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 1989, 1:263-268.
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
4. Carpenter R.H.S. Movements of the eyes 1988, Pion, London. 2nd ed.
5. Daniel P.M., Whitteridge D. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. Journal of Physiology 1961, 159:203-221.
6. Devalois R.L., Albrecht D.G., Thorell L.G. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research 1982, 22:545-559.
7. Freeman E., Sagi D., Driver J. Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(10):1032-1036.
8. Gelb D.J., Wilson H.R. Shifts in perceived size as a function of contrast and temporal modulation. Vision Research 1983, 23:71-82.
9. Gelb D.J., Wilson H.R. Shifts in perceived size due to masking. Vision Research 1983, 23:589-597.
10. Gilbert C.D. Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics. Neuron 1992, 9:1-13.
11. Gilbert C.D., Wiesel T.N. Intrinsic connectivity and receptive field properties in visual cortex. Vision Research 1985, 25:365-374.
12. Gilbert C.D., Wiesel T.N. Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1989, 9:2432-2442.
13. Giorgi R.G., Soong G.P., Woods R.L., Peli E. Facilitation of contrast detection in near-peripheral vision. Vision Research 2004, 44:3193-3202.
14. Graham N.V.S. Visual pattern analysers 1989, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Grinvald A., Lieke E.E., Frostig R.D., Hildesheim R. Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 14:2545-2568.
16. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 1963, 26:994-1002.
17. Kapadia M.K., Ito M., Gilbert C.D., Westheimer G. Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys. Neuron 1995, 15:843-856.
18. Lev M., Polat U. Collinear facilitation and suppression at the periphery. Vision Research 2011, 51:2488-2498.
19. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 49:467-477.
20. Malach R., Amir Y., Harel M., Grinvald A. Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1993, 90:10469-10473.
21. Malonek D., Tootell R.B., Grinvald A. Optical imaging reveals the functional architecture of neurons processing shape and motion in owl monkey area MT. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1994, 258:109-119.
22. Maniglia M., Pavan A., Cuturi L.F., Campana G., Sato G., Casco C. Reducing crowding by weakening inhibitory lateral interactions in the periphery with perceptual learning. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(10):e25568.
23. Martinez-Conde S., Macknik S.L., Hubel D.H. The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:229-2240.
24. Meirovithz E., Ayzenshtat I., Bonneh Y.S., Itzhack R., Werner-Reiss U., Slovin H. Population response to contextual influences in the primary visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:1293-1304.
25. Movshon J.A., Thompson I.D., Tolhurst D.J. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 1978, 283:101-120.
26. Pelli D.G. The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
27. Polat U. Effect of spatial frequency on collinear facilitation. Spatial Vision 2009, 22:179-193.
28. Polat U., Mizobe K., Pettet M.W., Kasamatsu T., Norcia A.M. Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature 1998, 391:580-584.
29. Polat U., Norcia A.M. Neurophysiological evidence for contrast dependent long range facilitation and suppression in the human visual cortex. Vision Research 1996, 36:2099-2109.
30. Polat U., Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research 1993, 33:993-999.
31. Polat U., Sagi D. The architecture of perceptual interactions. Vision Research 1994, 34:73-78.
32. Polat U., Sagi D. Spatial interactions in human vision: From near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1994, 91:1206-1209.
33. Polat U., Sagi D. The relationship between the subjective and objective aspects of visual filling-in. Vision Research 2007, 47:2473-2481.
34. Polat U., Tyler C.W. What pattern does the eye sees best?. Vision Research 1999, 39:887-895.
35. Pooresmaeili A., Herrero J.L., Self M.W., Roelfsema P.R., Thiele A. Suppressive lateral interactions at parafoveal representations in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:12745-12758.
36. Rovamo J., Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 1979, 37:495-510.
37. Shani R., Sagi D. Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions. Vision Research 2005, 45:2009-2024.
38. Tailby C., Cubells O., Metha A. Enhanced sensitivity for peripherally-presented collinearly-aligned stimulus elements: Contour detection or spatial summation?. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 2001, 84:354-360.
39. Ts'o D.Y., Gilbert C.D., Wiesel T.N. Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis. Journal of Neuroscience 1986, 6:1160-1170.
40. Watson A.B. Transfer of contrast sensitivity in linear visual networks. Visual Neuroscience 1992, 8:65-76.
41. Watson A.B., Barlow H.B., Robson J.G. What does the eye see best?. Nature 1983, 302:419-422.
42. Williams C.B., Hess R.F. Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1998, 15:2046-2051.
43. Zenger-Landolt B., Koch C. Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination - psychophysics and modeling. Vision Research 2001, 41:3663-3675.
44. Zenger B., Sagi D. Isolating excitatory and inhibitory nonlinear spatial interactions involved in contrast detection. Vision Research 1996, 36:2497-2513.