An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0

Telematics and Informatics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 504-520

  Sun, Po Ling ^a   Ku, Cheng Yuan ^b   Shih, Dong Her ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

E Government 2.0; Implementation framework; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

ONLINE SYSTEMS; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

DESIGN CHALLENGES; GOVERNMENT STANDARDS; IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; SERVICE INNOVATION; VARIOUS CHANNELS; WEB 2.0; WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES;

E-GOVERNMENT;

EID: 84921472616     PISSN: 07365853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2014.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. E. Abu-Shanab, and A. Al-Azzam Trust dimensions and the adoption of E-Government in Jordan Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Hum. Dev. 4 1 2012 39 51
2. I.A. Alghamdi, R. Goodwin, and G. Rampersad E-Government readiness assessment for government organizations in developing countries Comput. Inf. Sci. 4 3 2011 3 17
3. Bekkers, V.; Moody, R.; 2009. Visual culture and electronic government: exploring a new generation of E-Government. In: Wimmer, M.A. et al. (Eds.), EGOV 2009 Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5693. Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 257-269.
4. A. Chadwick Web 2.0: new challenges for the study of E-Democracy in an era of informational exuberance I/S: J. Law Policy Inf. Soc. 5 1 2009 9 41
5. K.-H. Cheung, K.Y. Yip, J.P. Townsend, and M. Scotch HCLS 2.0/3.0: health care and life sciences data mashup using Web 2.0/3.0 J. Biomed. Inform. 41 2008 694 705
6. C. Colombo, M. Kunstelj, F. Molinari, and L. Todorovski Workflow modeling for participatory policy design: lessons learned from three European regions J. Balkan Near East. Stud. 13 1 2011 117 139
7. Concilio, G.; Molinari, F.; 2011. Citizen participation in urban planning. In: Proceedings of the ECEG11 Conference, 16-17 June, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
8. FixMyStreet, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < https://www.fixmystreet.com/ >.
9. G4C: Government for Citizen, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.egov.go.kr >.
10. K. Gareis, T. Husing, and R. Richardson Does ICT use enhance social capital? Some evidence from a survey in twelve EU regions P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham, Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies 2008 IOS Press Amsterdam
11. Home Tax Service, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.hometax.go.kr >.
12. IDATE - TNO - IViR User-Created-Content: Supporting a participative Information Society 2008 IDATE - TNO - IViR Publishing
13. IOS Press Korea E-Government best practices J. E-Governance 34 4 2011 187 190
14. Korea ON-line E-Procurement System, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.g2b.go.kr >.
15. Korean Intellectual Property Office, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.kipo.go.kr >.
16. Körkortsportalen, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.korkortsportalen.se >.
17. A. Morris E-literacy and the grey digital divide: a review with recommendations J. Inf. Lit. 2 3 2007
18. D. Napitupulu The critical success factors study for e-Government implementation Int. J. Comput. Appl. 89 16 2014 23 32
19. National Office of Disaster Service, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://nods.gov.ag/ >.
20. National Tax Service, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.nts.go.kr/>.
21. NIA Concepts and Features of Government 2.0 and 3.0 2008 National Information Society Agency Korea Retrieved December 4, 2014, from: < http://www.mikekujawski.ca/ftp/Government2.0and3.0.pdf >
22. OECD Participative Web and User-Created Content: WEB 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking 2007 OECD Publishing
23. OECD e-Government Studies e-Government for Better Government 2005 OECD Publishing
24. OECD/OCDE Participative Web: User-Created Content 2007 OECD/OCDE Publishing
25. D. Osimo Benchmarking E-Government in the Web 2.0 era: what to measure, and how Eur. J. ePractice 4 2008 33 43
26. OurSpace Project and Consortium. 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.joinourspace.eu and http://www.ep-ourspace.eu >.
27. Parycek, P.; Schossböck, J.; Piswanger, C.-M.; Harm, R. (2012). A temperature check on open government: accessing parliamentarians' attitude towards democratic concepts. In: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2012, Danube University Krems, Austria.
28. Port-MIS 2.0, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < https://portmis.go.kr >.
29. PRESIDENCIA, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.presidencia.gob.ec/ >.
30. Public Procurement Service, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.pps.go.kr/ >.
31. Sandoval-Almazán, R.; 2012. Open government in Mexico: an assessment preview 2007-2010. In: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2012, Danube University Krems, Austria.
32. Servicio de Rentas Internas - SRI, 2014, December 2. Retrieved from: < http://www.sri.gob.ec/ >.
33. S. Shah Web 2.0 Security: Defending Ajax, RIA, and SOA 2008 THOMSON
34. F. Shirazi The contribution of ICT to freedom and democracy: an empirical analysis of archival data on the Middle East Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 35 6 2008 1 24
35. J. Sindelar, D. Mintz, and T. Hughes The past is prologue: the Obama technology agenda Public Manager 38 4 2010 24 27
36. The Institute for Public-Private Partnerships Public-Private Partnerships in E-Government: Handbook 2009 infoDev/World Bank Washington, DC Retrieved December 4, 2014, from: < http://www.infodev.org/infodev-files/resource/InfodevDocuments-822.pdf >
37. United Nations United Nations E-Government survey 2010: Leveraging E-Government at a Time of Financial and Economic Crisis 2010 UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Retrieved December 4, 2014, from: < http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2010 >
38. United Nations United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People 2012 UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Retrieved December 4, 2014, from: < http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2012 >
39. UNPOG E-Government of Korea: Best Practices 2009 Ministry of Public Administration and Security, National Information Society Agency
40. WAMIS-NET/RESIMAO, 2014, December 4. Retrieved from: < http://www.resimao.net/ >.
41. R.D. Waters, E. Burnett, A. Lamm, and J. Lucas Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook Public Relations Rev. 35 2009 102 106
42. A. Wright, D.W. Bates, B. Middleton, T. Hongsermeier, V. Kashyap, S.M. Thomas, and D.F. Sittig Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: issues and examples J. Biomed. Inform. 42 2 2009 334 346