The RAZOR (randomized open vs robotic cystectomy) trial: Study design and trial update

BJU International

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 198-205

  Smith, Norm D ^a   Castle, Erik P ^b   Gonzalgo, Mark L ^c   Svatek, Robert S ^d   Weizer, Alon Z ^e   Montgomery, Jeffrey S ^e   Pruthi, Raj S ^f   Woods, Michael E ^f   Tollefson, Matthew K ^g   Konety, Badrinath R ^h   Shabsigh, Ahmad ⁱ   Krupski, Tracey ^j   Barocas, Daniel A ^k   Dash, Atreya ^l   Quek, Marcus L ^m   Kibel, Adam S ⁿ   Parekh, Dipen J ^o  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

ⁱ OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^k VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^m LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

ⁿ BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

bladder cancer; clinical trials; cystectomy; robotics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CYSTECTOMY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STUDY DESIGN; URINARY DIVERSION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE III AS TOPIC; CYSTECTOMY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; URINARY DIVERSION;

EID: 84921461503     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12699     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A,. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10-29
2. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 666-675
3. Stein JP, Skinner DG,. Results with radical cystectomy for treating bladder cancer: a 'reference standard' for high-grade, invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2003; 92: 12-17
4. Cookson MS, Chang SS, Wells N, Parekh DJ, Smith JA Jr,. Complications of radical cystectomy for nonmuscle invasive disease: comparison with muscle invasive disease. J Urol 2003; 169: 101-104
5. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 164-174
6. Konety BR, Allareddy V, Herr H,. Complications after radical cystectomy: analysis of population-based data. Urology 2006; 68: 58-64
7. Hemal AK, Abol-Enein H, Tewari A, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the management of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 719-729
8. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS,. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 89-93
9. Guru KA, Kim HL, Piacente PM, Mohler JL,. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology 2007; 69: 469-474
10. Dasgupta P, Rimington P, Murphy D, Elhage O, Challacombe B, Khan MS,. Robotically assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1489-1490
11. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS,. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 196-201
12. Parekh DJ, Messer J, Fitzgerald J, Ercole B, Svatek R,. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol 2013; 189: 474-479
13. Johar RS, Hayn MH, Stegemann AP, et al. Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 52-57
14. Yuh BE, Nazmy M, Ruel NH, et al. Standardized analysis of frequency and severity of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 806-813
15. Soukup V, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, et al. Follow-up after surgical treatment of bladder cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 290-302
16. Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, et al. Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 762-772
17. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL,. Surgical volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117-2127
18. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1128-1137