|
|
Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 113-117
|
|
A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: Autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants
a
|
|
Author keywords
Autologous Bone; Cranioplasty; Custom computer generated implants
|
|
Indexed keywords
BIOMATERIAL;
BONE PROSTHESIS;
KETONE;
MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;
POLYETHERETHERKETONE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AUTOGRAFT;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
BONE PROSTHESIS;
BONE TRANSPLANTATION;
CHILD;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;
COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY;
COST;
CRANIOTOMY;
ECONOMICS;
EDUCATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HOSPITAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMPONENTS;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OPERATION DURATION;
PLASTIC SURGERY;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES;
YOUNG ADULT;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AUTOGRAFTS;
BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
BONE SUBSTITUTES;
BONE TRANSPLANTATION;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
COHORT STUDIES;
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN;
COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS;
CRANIOTOMY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HOSPITAL UNITS;
HUMANS;
INTENSIVE CARE;
KETONES;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OPERATIVE TIME;
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;
PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;
RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
|
EID: 84921437441
PISSN: 10492275
EISSN: 15363732
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001305 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (66)
|
|
References (12)
|
