|
Volumn , Issue 2, 2000, Pages
|
Kinesthetic stimulation versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT;
METHYLXANTHINE;
THEOPHYLLINE;
XANTHINE DERIVATIVE;
APNEA;
BED;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
KINESIOLOGY;
NEWBORN;
PREMATURITY;
REVIEW;
STIMULATION;
APNEA;
BEDS;
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INFANT, PREMATURE;
INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES;
KINESIOLOGY, APPLIED;
PHYSICAL STIMULATION;
THEOPHYLLINE;
XANTHINES;
|
EID: 84921430305
PISSN: None
EISSN: 1469493X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (21)
|
References (1)
|