Development and Field Test of the Modified Draw-a-Scientist Test and the Draw-a-Scientist Rubric

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 109-116

  Farland Smith, Donna ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921385616     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00124.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barman, C. (1996). Do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children, 34(1), 30–33.
2. Barman, C. (1997). Students' views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 35(1), 18–23.
3. Chambers, D. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.
4. Chiang, C., & Guo, C. (1996). A study of the images of the scientist for elementary school children. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
5. Entwisle, D. R., & Greenberger, E. (1972). Adolescents' views of women's work roles. American Journal of Orthopsychology, 42(4), 648–656.
6. Farland, D. (2003). The effect of historical, non-fiction, trade books on third grade students' perceptions of scientists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
7. Finson, K. D. (2003). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–346.
8. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-a-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.
9. Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26, 8–13.
10. Fung, Y. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students' images of scientists.Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 199–213.
11. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription & compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–579.
12. Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376.
13. Maoldomhnaigh, M., & Hunt, A. (1988). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6, 159–166.
14. Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students. Science, 126, 384–390.
15. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Newton, D., & Newton, L. (1992).Young children's perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 331–348.
17. Newton, D., & Newton, D. (1998). Primary children's perceptions of science and the scientist: Is the impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotype? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1137–1149.
18. Schibeci, R. A. (1989). Home, school, and peer group influences on student attitudes and achievement in science. Science Education, 73(1), 13–24.
19. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14–20.
20. She, H. (1998). Gender and grade level differences in Taiwan students' stereotypes of science and scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2), 125–135.
21. Song, J., Pak, S., & Jang, K. (1992). Attitudes of boys and girls in elementary and secondary schools towards science lessons and scientists.Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 12, 109–118.