Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-15

  Bonett, Douglas G ^a   Wright, Thomas A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence interval; Cronbach's alpha; Sample size planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921367774     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.1960     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bonett, D. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 235-240.
2. Bonett, D. G. (2003). Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha reliability coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 235-240.
3. Bonett, D. G. (2008). Confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means. Psychological Methods, 13, 99-109.
4. Bonett, D. G. (2010). Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability. Psychological Methods, 15, 368-385.
5. Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2000). Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall, and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika, 65, 23-28.
6. Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2007). Comments and recommendations regarding the hypothesis testing controversy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 647-659.
7. Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2009). Confidence intervals in supply chain and operations research. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 26-33.
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the interval structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
9. Duhachek, A., & Iacobucci, D. (2004). Alpha standard error (ASE): An accurate and precise confidence interval estimate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 792-808.
10. Feldt, L. S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 30, 357-370.
11. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1980). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
12. Jones, L. V., & Tukey, J. W. (2000). A sensible formulation of the significance test. Psychological Methods, 5, 411-414.
13. Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
14. Kistner, E. O., & Muller, K. E. (2004). Exact distribution of intraclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha with Gaussian data and general covariance. Psychometrika, 69, 459-474.
15. Kruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012). The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 722-752.
16. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
17. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Padilla, M. A., Divers, J., & Newton, M. (2012). Coefficient alpha bootstrap confidence interval under nonnormality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 331-348.
19. Sijtsma, K. (2009). Reliability: Beyond theory and into practice. Psychometrika, 74, 169-173.
20. van Zyl, J., Neudecker, H. M., & Nel, D. G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 65, 271-280.
21. Wellek, S. (2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence and noninferiority (2nd edn). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.
22. Yuan, K.-H., Guarnaccia, C. A., & Hayslip, B. (2003). A study of the distribution of sample coefficient α with the Hopkins symptom checklist: Bootstrap versus asymptotics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 5-23.