SDMvspecies: A software for creating virtual species for species distribution modelling

Ecography

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 108-110

  Duan, Ren Yan ^a   Kong, Xiao Quan ^a   Huang, Min Yi ^a   Wu, Gan Lin ^a   Wang, Zhi Gao ^a  

^a ANQING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SOFTWARE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84921366293     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01080     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Barbet-Massin, M. et al. 2012. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? - Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 327-338.
2. Barve, N. et al. 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. - Ecol. Model. 222: 1810-1819.
3. Hijmans, R. J. 2014. Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. - .
4. Hijmans, R. J. et al. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. - Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
5. Hirzel, A. et al. 2001. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. - Ecol. Model. 145: 111-121.
6. Jiménez-Valverde, A. and Lobo, J. M. 2007. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. - Acta Oecol. 31: 361-369.
7. Li, W. and Guo, Q. 2013. How to assess the prediction accuracy of species presence-absence models without absence data? - Ecography 36: 788-799.
8. Lobo, J. M. and Tognelli, M. F. 2011. Exploring the effects of quantity and location of pseudo-absences and sampling biases on the performance of distribution models with limited point occurrence data. - J. Nat. Conserv. 19: 1-7.
9. Meynard, C. N. and Kaplan, D. M. 2013. Using virtual species to study species distributions and model performance. - J. Biogeogr. 40: 1-8.
10. Peterson, A. T. 2011. Ecological niche conservatism: a time- structured review of evidence. - J. Biogeogr. 38: 817-827.
11. Varela, S. et al. 2014. Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. - Ecography 37: 1084-1091.