A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 136, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 2210-2215

  Lash, Timothy L ^a,b   Riis, Anders H ^b   Ostenfeld, Eva B ^b,c   Erichsen, Rune ^b   Vyberg, Mogens ^c   Thorlacius Ussing, Ole ^c  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Colorectal neoplasms; Epidemiology; Secondary

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE; DANISH CITIZEN; DENMARK; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CANCER STAGING; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGISTER; RISK; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DENMARK; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; REGISTRIES; RISK; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84921360555     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29267     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2014. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/19752011/, Accessed 28 April 2014.
2. Kræftens Bekæmpelse. Tyktarmskræft. Copenhagen, Denmark: Kræftens Bekæmpelse, 2014. http://www.cancer.dk/Hjaelp1viden/kraeftformer/kraeftsygdomme/tyktarm, Accessed 28 April 2014.
3. Vigano L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, et al. Evolution of long-Term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases: Analysis of actual 5-year survival rates over two decades. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19: 2035-44.
4. Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284: 3028-35.
5. Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, et al. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: A review of evidence. Part 2: Long-Term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2007;9: 38-46.
6. Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ, et al. Northern Region Colorectal Cancer Audit G. Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancerrelated outcomes. Br J Surg 2010;97: 1416-30.
7. Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Schrag D, et al. Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Ann Intern Med 2003;139: 649-57.
8. Vigano L, Ravarino N, Ferrero A, et al. Prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapyassociated liver injuries. Arch Surg 2012;147: 1085-91.
9. Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL, et al. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39: S20-3.
10. Hansen MH, Balteskard L, Dorum LM, et al. Norwegian Colorectal Cancer G. Locally recurrent rectal cancer in Norway. Br J Surg 2009;96: 1176-82.
11. Kodeda K, Holmberg E, Steineck G, et al. Regional differences in local recurrence rates after rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2010;12: E206-15.
12. Hassett MJ, Ritzwoller DP, Taback N, et al. Validating billing/encounter codes as indicators of lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer recurrence using 2 large contemporary cohorts. Med Care 2012;52: E65-73.
13. Cummings KC, III, Xu F, Cummings LC, et al. A comparison of epidural analgesia and traditional pain management effects on survival and cancer recurrence after colectomy: A population-based study. Anesthesiology 2012;116: 797-806.
14. McClish D, Penberthy L, Pugh A. Using Medicare claims to identify second primary cancers and recurrences in order to supplement a cancer registry. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56: 760-7.
15. Harling H, Nickelsen T. The Danish Colorectal Cancer Database [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2005;167: 4187-9.
16. Nickelsen TN, Harling H, Kronborg O, et al. The completeness and quality of the Danish Colorectal Cancer clinical database on colorectal cancer [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2004;166: 3092-5.
17. Gogenur I, Ingeholm P, Iversen LH. Danish Colorectal Cancer Database [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2012;174: 2525.
18. Gjerstorff ML. The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health 2011;39: 42-5.
19. Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011;39: 30-3.
20. Lund JL, Froslev T, Deleuran T, et al. Validity of the Danish National Registry of Patients for chemotherapy reporting among colorectal cancer patients is high. Clin Epidemiol 2013;5: 327-34.
21. Erichsen R, Lash TL, Hamilton-Dutoit S, et al. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: The Danish National Pathology Registry and Data Bank. Clin Epidemiol 2010;2: 51-56.
22. Stender MT, Frokjaer JB, Larsen TB, et al. Preoperative plasma D-dimer is a predictor of postoperative deep venous thrombosis in colorectal cancer patients: A clinical, prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52: 446-51.
23. Ostenfeld EB, Froslev T, Friis S, et al. Completeness of colon and rectal cancer staging in the Danish Cancer Registry, 2004-2009. Clin Epidemiol 2012;4 Suppl 2: 33-8.
24. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40: 373-83.
25. Brenner H, Savitz DA. The effects of sensitivity and specificity of case selection on validity, sample size, precision, and power in hospital-based case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132: 181-92.
26. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review. Cancer 2008;112: 228-42.
27. Bonevski B, Randell M, Paul C, et al. Reaching the hard-To-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14: 42.
28. Barisic A, Glendon G, Weerasooriya N, et al. Accuracy of Self-Reported Breast Cancer Information among Women from the Ontario Site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012;2012: 310804.