Dynamic response signatures of a scaled model platform for floating wind turbines in an ocean wave basin

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 373, Issue 2035, 2015, Pages

  Jaksic, V ^a   O'Shea, R ^a   Cahill, P ^a   Murphy, J ^a   Mandic, D P ^b   Pakrashi, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Delay vector variance; Offshore wind energy; Signal nonlinearity; Structural dynamics; Tension leg platform

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; LIFE CYCLE; OCEAN CURRENTS; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; WATER WAVES; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINES;

DEGREE OF NON-LINEARITY; DELAY VECTOR VARIANCES; FLOATING WIND TURBINES; LASER DOPPLER VIBROMETERS; OFF-SHORE WIND ENERGY; STRUCTURAL MONITORING; SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; TENSION LEG PLATFORMS (TLP);

TENSION-LEG PLATFORMS;

EID: 84921329594     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0078     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Jeffrey H, Sedgwick J. 2011 ORECCA European offshore renewable energy roadmap. Edinburgh, UK: ORECCA Coordinated Action Project.
2. Arapogianni A et al. 2007 Deep water - the next step for offshore wind energy. Brussels, Belgium: The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA).
3. Beaudry-Losique J et al. 2011 A national offshore wind strategy: creating an offshore wind energy industry in the United States. US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Wind & Water Power Program; US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement. See http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/national-offshore-wind-strategy.pdf.
4. Carbontrust. 2012 Technology innovation needs assessment (TINA): offshore wind power summary report. Low Carbon Innovation Coordination Group. See https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/48279/4467-tina-offshore-wind-summary. pdf.
5. Bulder BH, Henderson A, Huijsmans RHM, Peeringa JM, Pierik JTG, Snijders EJB, van Hees MT, Wijnants GH, Wolf MJ. 2003 Floating offshore wind turbines for shallow waters. In Proc. European Wind Energy Association (EWEC 2003), Madrid, Spain, 16-19 June 2003. Brussels, Belgium: EWEA.
6. Godo SN. 2013 Dynamic response of floating wind turbines. Trondheim, Norway: Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
7. Andrus C. 2011 Floating foundation for offshore wind turbines. Ship Offshore 3, 58-59.
8. INWORK. 2013 Floating offshore wind foundations: industry consortia and projects in the United States, Europe and Japan. An overview. Main(e) International Consulting LLC. See http://www.compositesworld.com/cdn/cms/uploadedFiles/floating-offshore-wind-consortia.pdf.
9. Ishihara T, Taki S. 2014 Fukushima offshore wind consortium: Fukushima floating offshore wind farm demonstration project (Fukushima FORWARD). Tokyo, Japan: Department of Civil Engineering School of Engineering, University of Tokyo.
10. PrinciplePower. 2009-2011 WindFloat. See http://www.principlepowerinc.com/products/windfloat.html.
11. Butterfield S, Musial W, Jonkman J, Sclavounos P, Wayman L. 2005 Engineering challenges for floating offshore wind turbines. In Proc. Copenhagen OffshoreWind Conf. (COW05), Copenhagen, Denmark, 26-28 October 2005. Brussels, Belgium: EWEA.
12. Jonkman JM. 2007 Dynamics modeling and loads analysis of an offshore floating wind turbine. Technical Report NREL/TP-500-41958. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. See http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/41958.pdf.
13. Breton S-P, Moe G. 2009 Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America. Renew. Energy 34, 646-654. (doi:10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.040)
14. Manuel L, Sweetman B,Winterstein SR. 2001 Analytical predictions of the air gap response of floating structures. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 123, 112-117. (doi:10.1115/1.1372195)
15. Winterstein SR, Sweetman B. 2001 Air gap response of floating structures: statistical predictions versus observed behavior. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 123, 118-123. (doi:10.1115/1.1377867)
16. Nielsen FG, Hanson TD, Skaare B. 2006 Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. In Proc. OMAE 2006, Hamburg, Germany, 4-9 June 2006. New York, NY:ASME.
17. Agarwal P, Manuel L. 2009 Simulation of offshore wind turbine response for long-term extreme load prediction. Eng. Struct. 31, 2236-2246. (doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.002)
18. Han SM, Benaroya H. 2002 Comparison of linear and nonlinear responses of a compliant tower to random wave forces. Chaos Solitons Fractals 14, 269-291. (doi:10.1016/S0960-0779(01)00232-6)
19. Islam N, Zaheer MM, Ahmed S. 2009 Double hinged articulated tower interaction with wind and waves. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97, 287-297. (doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2009.07.002).
20. Waris MB, Ishihara T. 2012 Dynamic response analysis of floating offshore wind turbine with different types of heave plates and mooring systems by using a fully nonlinearmodel. Coupled Syst. Mech. 1, 247-268. (doi:10.12989/csm.2012.1.3.247)
21. Murphy J, O'Shea R, O'Sullivan K, Pakrashi V. 2013 Dynamic responses of a scaled tension leg platform, wind turbine support structure in a wave tank. Key Eng. Mater. 569-570, 563. (doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.563)
22. DET NORSKE VERITAS. 2013 Design of floating wind turbine structures. Offshore Standard DNV-OS-J103. See http://www.dnv.com.
23. Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH). 2007 Standard: design of offshore wind turbines. BSH no. 7005. See http://www.onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/mb/Offshore%20Wind/Standard.pdf.
24. Pakrashi V, O'Sullivan K, O'Shea R, Murphy J. 2013 Experimental responses of a monopile foundation with a wave energy converter attached. In Proc. Hydro 2013 International, Chennai, India, 4-6 December 2013. Chennai, India: Indian Institute of Technology Madras.
25. Swartz RA, Lynch JP, Zerbst S, Sweetman B, Rolfes R. 2010 Structural monitoring of wind turbines using wireless sensor networks. Smart Struct. Syst. 6, 183-196.
26. Bian C, Ning X. 2004 Evaluating age-related loss of nonlinearity degree in short-term heartbeat series by optimum modeling dimension. Physica A 337, 149-156. (doi:10.1016/j.physa.2004.01.040)
27. Tsonis AA, Heller FL, Tsonis PA. 2002 Probing the linearity and nonlinearity in DNA sequences. Physica A 312, 458-468. (doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00859-2)
28. Su Z-Y, Wu T, Yang P-H, Wang Y-T. 2008 Dynamic analysis of heartbeat rate signals of epileptics using multidimensional phase space reconstruction approach. Physica A 387, 2293-2305. (doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.12.008)
29. Schreiber T, Schmitz A. 2000 Surrogate time series. Physica D 142, 346-382. (doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00043-9)
30. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Doyne Farmer J. 1992 Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58, 77-94. (doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S)
31. Schreiber T, Schmitz A. 1996 Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 635-638. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635)
32. Hegger R, Kantz H, Schreiber T. 1999 Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: the TISEAN package. Chaos 9, 413-433. (doi:10.1063/1.166424)
33. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Hulle MMV. 2003 Signal nonlinearity in fMRI: a comparison between BOLD and MION. IEEE Trans. Med. Imagining 22, 636-644.
34. Mandic DP, Chambers JA. 2001 Some practical considerations of predictability and learning algorithms for various signals. In Recurrent neural networks for prediction: learning algorithms, architectures and stability (ed. S Haykin), pp. 171-198. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.
35. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Hulle MMV. 2004 The delay vector variance method for detecting determinism and nonlinearity in time series. Physica D 190, 167-176. (doi:10.1016/j.physd.2003.11.001)
36. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Hulle MMV. 2003 Indications of nonlinear structures in brain electrical activity. Phys. Rev. E 67, 046204(5). (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.046204)
37. Mandic DP, Chen M, Gautama T, Van Hulle MM, Constantinides A. 2008 On the characterization of the deterministic/stochastic and linear/nonlinear nature of time series. Proc. R. Soc. A 464, 1141-1160. (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.0154)
38. Gautama T, Hulle MMV, Mandic DP. 2004 On the characterisation of the deterministic/stochastic and linear/nonlinear nature of time series. DPM-04-05. London, UK: Imperial College London.
39. Kuntamalla S, Reddy RGL. 2011 The effect of aging on nonlinearity and stochastic nature of heart rate variability signal computed using delay vector variance method. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 14, 40-44. (doi:10.5120/1837-2470)
40. Addo PM, Billo M, Guegan D. 2012 Understanding exchange rates dynamics. In Proc. 20th Int. Conf. on Computational Statistics (COMPSTAT 2012), Limassol, Cyprus, 27-31 August 2012. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
41. Schreiber T. 1999 Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods. Phys. Rep. 308, 1-64.
42. Jianjun Y, Haijun W, Chunming X, Yiqin W, Fufeng L, Rui G, Tiancai M. 2008 Nonlinear analysis in TCM acoustic diagnosis using delay vector variance. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE 2008), Shanghai, China, 16-18 May 2008. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE.
43. Andrzejak RG, Lehnertz K, Mormann F, Rieke C, David P, Elger CE. 2001 Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite-dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: dependence on recording region and brain state. Phys. Rev. E 64, 061907. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.061907)
44. HongyingH, Fuliang Y. 2009 Diesel engine fault information acquisition based on delay vector variance method. In Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling (KAM'09), Wuhan, China, 30 November-1 December 2009. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
45. Casale C, Lembo E, Serri L, Viani S. 2010 Preliminary design of a floating wind turbine support structure and relevant system cost assessment. Wind Eng. 34, 29-50. (doi:10.1260/0309-524X.34.1.29)
46. Sclavounos PD, Lee S, DiPietro J, Potenza G, Caramuscio P, De Michele G. 2010 Floating offshore wind turbines: tension leg platform and taught leg buoy concepts supporting 3-5 MW wind turbines. In Proc. European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC 2010), Warsaw, Poland, 20-23 April 2010. Brussels, Belgium: EWEA.
47. Lefebvre S, Collu M. 2012 Preliminary design of a floating support structure for a 5MW offshore wind turbine. Ocean Eng. 40, 15-26. (doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.12.009)
48. Jain A, Robertson AN, Jonkman JM, Goupee AJ, Kimball RW, Swift AHP. 2012 FAST code verification of Scaling Laws for DeepCwind floating wind system tests. In Proc. 22nd Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., Rhodes, Greece, 17-23 June 2012. Mountain View, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE). See http://www.isope.org/publications/proceedings/ISOPE/ISOPE%202012/start.htm.
49. Robertson AN, Jonkman JM, Masciola MD, Molta P, Goupee AJ, Coulling AJ, Prowell I, Browning J. 2013 Summary of conclusions and recommendations drawn from the deepcwind scaled floating offshore wind system test campaign. In Proc. ASME 2013 32nd Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Nantes, France, 9-14 June 2013. Brussels, Belgium: NREL.
50. Vanlanduit S, Cauberghe B, Guillaume P, Verboven P. 2004 Automatic vibration mode tracking using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer. Opt. Lasers Eng. 42, 315-326. (doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2003.07.001)
51. Vuye C, Vanlanduit S, Guillaume P. 2009 Accurate estimation of normal incidence absorption coefficients with confidence intervals using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer. Opt. Lasers Eng. 47, 644-650. (doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.01.003)
52. Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. 2009 Noncontact operational modal analysis of structural members by laser Doppler vibrometer. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 24, 249-265. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00585.x)
53. Dean RG, Dalrymple RA. 1991 Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. Singapore: World Scientific.
54. ur Rehman N, Mandic DP. 2009 Qualitative analysis of rotational modes within three dimensional empirical mode decomposition. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2009), Taipei, Taiwan, 19-24 April 2009. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
55. Beirlant J, Dudewicz EJ, Gyorfi L, Meulen ECVD. 2001 Nonparametric entropy estimation: an overview. Int. J. Math. Stat. Sci. 6, 17-39.
56. Gautama T, Mandic DP, Van Hulle MM. 2003 A differential entropy based method for determining the optimal embedding parameters of a signal. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 6 (ICASSP '03), Hong Kong, 6-10 April 2003, pp. 29-32. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
57. Okamoto S, Nanba R, Shibao K, Satou M, Shibao Y. 2007 Research on vibration and scattering of roof tiles by wind tunnel test. J. Environ. Eng. 2, 237-246. (doi:10.1299/jee.2.237)
58. Castellini P, Paone N, Tomasini EP. 1996 The laser Doppler vibrometer as an instrument for nonintrusive diagnostic of works of art: application to fresco paintings. Opt. Lasers Eng. 25, 227-246. (doi:10.1016/0143-8166(95)00073-9)
59. Senatore A. 2006 Measurement of the natural frequencies of a uniform rod loaded with centrifugal forces using a laser Doppler vibrometer. Meas. Tech. 49, 43-48. (doi:10.1007/s11018-006-0060-5)
60. Khan AZ, Stanbridge AB, Ewins DJ. 2000 Detecting damage in vibrating structures with a scanning LDV. Opt. Lasers Eng. 32, 583-592. (doi:10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00004-X)
61. Lynch K, Murphy J. 2012 Overview of offshore wind and ocean energy technologies. Cork, Ireland: Hydraulics and Maritime Research Centre (HMRC), University College Cork.