Revisiting monotop production at the LHC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-24

  Boucheneb, Idir ^a   Cacciapaglia, Giacomo ^a,b   Deandrea, Aldo ^a,b,e   Fuks, Benjamin ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b CENTRE DE CALCUL DE L INSTITUT NATIONAL DE PHYSIQUE NUCLEAIRE ET DE PHYSIQUE DES PARTICULES   (France)

^c CERN   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^e INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

Phenomenological Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921320575     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2015)017     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults.
2. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsSUS.
3. E.L. Berger, B.W. Harris and Z. Sullivan, Single top squark production via R-parity violating supersymmetric couplings in hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4472 [hep-ph/9903549] [INSPIRE].
4. F. del Aguila, J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and L. Ametller, Zt and γt production via top flavor changing neutral couplings at the Fermilab Tevatron, Phys. Lett.B 462 (1999) 310 [hep-ph/9906462] [INSPIRE].
5. E.L. Berger, B.W. Harris and Z. Sullivan, Direct probes of R-parity violating supersymmetric couplings via single top squark production, Phys. Rev.D 63 (2001) 115001 [hep-ph/0012184] [INSPIRE].
6. N. Desai and B. Mukhopadhyaya, R-parity violating resonant stop production at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP10 (2010) 060 [arXiv:1002.2339] [INSPIRE].
7. H. Davoudiasl, D.E. Morrissey, K. Sigurdson and S. Tulin, Baryon destruction by asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 096008 [arXiv:1106.4320] [INSPIRE].
8. J. Andrea, B. Fuks and F. Maltoni, Monotops at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 074025 [arXiv:1106.6199] [INSPIRE].
9. J.F. Kamenik and J. Zupan, Discovering dark matter through flavor violation at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 111502 [arXiv:1107.0623] [INSPIRE].
10. Z. Dong, G. Durieux, J.-M. Gerard, T. Han and F. Maltoni, Baryon number violation at the LHC: the top option, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 016006 [arXiv:1107.3805] [INSPIRE].
11. J. Wang, C.S. Li, D.Y. Shao and H. Zhang, Search for the signal of monotop production at the early LHC, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 034008 [arXiv:1109.5963] [INSPIRE].
12. B. Fuks, Beyond the minimal supersymmetric standard model: from theory to phenomenology, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 27 (2012) 1230007 [arXiv:1202.4769] [INSPIRE].
13. A. Kumar, J.N. Ng, A. Spray and P.T. Winslow, Tracking down the top quark forward-backward asymmetry with monotops, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075012 [arXiv:1308.3712] [INSPIRE].
14. E. Alvarez, E.C. Leskow, J. Drobnak and J.F. Kamenik, Leptonic monotops at LHC, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 014016 [arXiv:1310.7600] [INSPIRE].
15. J.-L. Agram, J. Andrea, M. Buttignol, E. Conte and B. Fuks, Monotop phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 014028 [arXiv:1311.6478] [INSPIRE].
16. B. Fuks, J. Proudom, J. Rojo and I. Schienbein, Characterizing new physics with polarized beams at high-energy hadron colliders, JHEP05 (2014) 045 [arXiv:1403.2383] [INSPIRE].
17. J.N. Ng and A. de la Puente, Probing radiative neutrino mass generation through monotop production, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 095018 [arXiv:1404.1415] [INSPIRE].
18. √s = 1.96 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 201802 [arXiv:1202.5653] [INSPIRE].
19. CMS collaboration, Search for new physics with monotop final states in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV,CMS-PAS-B2G-12-022(2012).
20. CMS collaboration, Search for monotop signatures in proton-proton collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, arXiv:1410.1149 [INSPIRE].
21. ATLAS collaboration, Search for invisible particles produced in association with single-top-quarks in proton-proton collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1410.5404 [INSPIRE].
22. H. Davoudiasl, D.E. Morrissey, K. Sigurdson and S. Tulin, Hylogenesis: a unified origin for baryonic visible matter and antibaryonic dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 211304 [arXiv:1008.2399] [INSPIRE].
23. I. Jack and H. Osborn, General two loop β-functions for gauge theories with arbitrary scalar fields, J. Phys.A 16 (1983) 1101 [INSPIRE].
24. L.-F. Li, Oblique electroweak corrections from heavy scalar fields, Z. Phys.C 58 (1993) 519 [INSPIRE].
25. G. Bhattacharyya, A. Kundu, T. De and B. Dutta-Roy, Effects of isodoublet color-octet scalar bosons on oblique electroweak parameters, J. Phys.G 21 (1995) 153 [INSPIRE].
26. ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived, multi-charged particles in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett.B 722 (2013) 305 [arXiv:1301.5272] [INSPIRE].
27. CMS collaboration, Searches for long-lived charged particles in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$and 8 TeV, JHEP07 (2013) 122 [arXiv:1305.0491] [INSPIRE].
28. J. Alwall et al., Computing decay rates for new physics theories with FeynRules and MadGraph5/aMC@NLO, arXiv:1402.1178 [INSPIRE].
29. A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].
30. E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The early universe, Frontiers in Physics volume 69, Addison-Wesley, U.S.A. (1990).
31. CDF collaboration, T.A. Aaltonen et al., Direct measurement of the total decay width of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 202001 [arXiv:1308.4050] [INSPIRE].
32. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
33. tb | CKM matrix element in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, JHEP06 (2014) 090 [arXiv:1403.7366] [INSPIRE].
34. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the t-channel single top-quark production cross section in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett.B 717 (2012) 330 [arXiv:1205.3130] [INSPIRE].
35. S. Kraml et al., Searches for new physics: Les Houches recommendations for the presentation of LHC results, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 1976 [arXiv:1203.2489] [INSPIRE].
36. N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
37. A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
38. C. Degrande et al., UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].
39. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
40. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
41. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
42. B. Dumont, B. Fuks, S. Kraml, S. Bein, G. Chalons et al., Towards a public analysis database for LHC new physics searches using MadAnalysis 5, arXiv:1407.3278 [INSPIRE].
43. E. Conte, B. Fuks and G. Serret, MadAnalysis 5, a user-friendly framework for collider phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 222 [arXiv:1206.1599] [INSPIRE].
44. E. Conte, B. Dumont, B. Fuks and C. Wymant, Designing and recasting LHC analyses with MadAnalysis 5, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3103 [arXiv:1405.3982] [INSPIRE].