Call for special issue of midwifery on risk in childbirth

Midwifery

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 257-258

  Coxon, Kirstie ^a   Bisits, Andrew ^b   Sandall, Jane ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR WOMEN   (Australia)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; PUBLISHING; UTILIZATION;

HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; PARTURITION; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84921308862     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Arney W.R. Power and the Profession of Obstetrics 1982, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1st ed.
2. Dahlen H.G., Jackson M., Stevens J. Homebirth, freebirth and doulas: casualty and consequences of a broken maternity system. Women Birth: J. Austr. Coll. Midwives 2011, 24:47-50. 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.11.002.
3. Davis-Floyd R.E., Sargent C.F. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross Cultural Perspectives 1997, vol. 1. University of California Press, Berkeley, LA, London.
4. Birth by design: pregnancy. Matern. Midwifery N. Am. Eur. 2001, 301. Routledge, New York and London. 1st ed. R. DeVries, C. Benoit, E.R. van Teijlingen, S. Wrede (Eds.).
5. Friedson E. The Profession of Medicine 1970, vol. 1. Dodd Mead, New York.
6. MacKenzie Bryers H., van Teijlingen E. Risk, theory, social and medical models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery 2010, 26:488-496. 10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.003.
7. Scamell M. The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: a tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociol. Health Illness 2011, 33:987-1001. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01366.x.