Social metacognition: Thinking about thinking in social psychology

Social Metacognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-18

  Briñol, Pablo ^a,b   Demarree, Kenneth G ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921305329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203865989     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361.
3. Benjamin, A. S., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition(pp. 309–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bless, H., & Forgas, J. P. (Eds.) (2000). The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
5. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009a). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 41, (pp. 69–118). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009b). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96.
7. Carruthers, P. (2009). How we know our own minds: The relationship between mind-reading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 121–138.
8. Costermans, J., Lories, G., & Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 142–150.
9. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545–565.
11. Eisenstadt, D. & Leippe, M. R. (2010). Social influences on eyewitness confidence: The social psychology of memory self-certainty. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), The uncertain self: A handbook of perspectives from social and personality psychology (pp. 36–61). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
12. Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 324–340.
13. Fleming, S. T., Weil, R. S., Nagy, Z., Dolan, R. J., & Rees, G. (2010). Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in the brain structure. Science, 329, 1541–1543.
14. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208–216.
15. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326–338.
16. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 391–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover.
18. Johns, M., & Schmader, T. (2010). Meta-cognitive regulation as a reaction to the uncertainty of stereotype threat. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), The uncertain self: A handbook of perspectives from social and personality psychology(pp. 176–192). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
19. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 137–154.
20. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639.
21. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma’ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased under confidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147–162.
22. Leippe, M. R., Wells, G. L., & Ostrom, T. M. (1978). Crime seriousness as a determinant of accuracy in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 345–351.
23. McGuire, W. J. (1999). Constructing social psychology: Creative and critical processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficiency of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327–337.
25. Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 159–163.
26. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,15, 174–179.
27. Mischel, W. (1998). Metacognition at the hyphen of social-cognitive psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 84–86.
28. Mussweiler, T., & Neumann, R. (2000). Sources of mental contamination: Comparing the effects of self-generated versus externally provided primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 194–206.
29. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2009). Introspection and interpretation: Dichotomy or continuum? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 157–158.
31. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657–686.
32. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.
33. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York, NY: Guilford.
34. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995) (Eds.). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M. & Brock, T. C. (1981) (Eds.). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Pronin, E., & Jacobs, E. (2008). Thought speed, mood, and the experience of mental motion. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 461–485.
37. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435–451.
38. Rucker, D. D., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2008). What’s in a frame anyway? A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 137–149.
39. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
40. Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278–298). New York, NY: Routledge.
41. Skurnik, I., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2000). Drawing inferences from feelings: The role of naive beliefs. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior(pp. 162–175). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
42. Strack, F., & Förster, J. (1998). Self-reflection and recognition: The role of metacognitive knowledge in the attribution of recollective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 111–123.
43. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
45. Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360–376.
46. Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (Eds.). (1984). Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge.
47. Wells, G. L., Olson, E. A., & Charman, S. D. (2002). The confidence of eyewitnesses in their identifications from lineups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 151–154.
48. Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
49. Wilson, T. D., Gilbert, D. T., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Protecting our minds: The role of lay beliefs. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 171–201). New York, NY: Sage.
50. Wright, P. (2002). Marketplace metacognition and social intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 677–682.
51. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Lories, G., & Dardenne, B. (1998). Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions. New York, NY: Sage.