Collective action challenges in the implementation of the multilateral system of the international treaty: What roles for the CGIAR centres?

Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons: Challenges in International Law and Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 310-328

  Louafi, Selim ^a  

^a CIRAD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921289562     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849776813     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1998) ‘Selected Policy Issues in International Agricultural Research: On Striving for International Public Goods in an Era of Donor Fatigue’, World Development 26 (6): 1149–62.
2. Ashby, J. (2009) ‘Fostering Farmer First Methodological Innovation: Organizational Learning and Change in International Agricultural Research’, in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (eds), Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development, Practical Action Publishing, Bourton on Dunsmore, UK.
3. Brahy, N., and S. Louafi (2007) The Role of the Research Sector in ABS Governance, Idées pour le débat, no. 9, Iddri, Paris online: www.iddri.org/Publications/Collections/Idees-pour-ledebat/ Id_0709_Brahy&Louafi_ABS.pdf (last accessed 11 May 2011).
4. Byerlee, D., and H.J. Dubin (2010) ‘Crop Improvement in the CGIAR as a Global Success Story of Open Access and International Collaboration’, International Journal of the Commons 4(1): 452–80.
5. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Interim Science Council (2002) Lessons Learned in the Implementation of System-Wide Programmes, CGIAR Interim Science Council Secretariat, FAO, Rome.
6. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (2005) CGIAR Research Priorities 2005–2015, Draft, Science Council Secretariat, FAO, Rome.
7. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (2008) The Role of System-Wide Initiatives in Implementing the CGIAR’s Research Agenda: An Assessment of Current System-Wide and Eco-Regional Programs (SWEPs), CGIAR Science Council Secretariat, Rome.
8. Dalrymple, D.G. (2006a) ‘Setting the Agenda for Science and Technology in the Public Sector: The Case of International Agricultural Research’, Science and Public Policy 33(4): 277–90.
9. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (2006b) ‘Social Science Knowledge as Public Good for Agriculture’, in M.M. Cernea and A.H. Kassam (eds), Researching the Culture in Agri-Culture: Social Research for International Development, CABI Publishing, London.
10. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (2008) ‘International Agricultural Research as a Global Public Good: Concepts, Experience, and Policy Issues’, Journal of International Development 9(4): 459–82.
11. Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2009) ‘The Role of Law, Institutions and Governance Processes in Facilitating Access to Genomics Research’, in G. Van Overwalle (ed.), Gene Patents and Clearing Models: From Concepts to Cases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Dryzek, J., D. Downes, C. Hunold and D. Schlosberg (2005) ‘Green Political Strategy and the State: Combining Political Theory and Comparative History’, in J. Barry and R. Eckersley (eds), The State and the Global Ecological Crisis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Eng-Siang, L. (2008) Implementing the Treaty, Developing Country Concerns, Sawtee Policy Brief no. 16, 85(3): 692–97.
14. Gardner, B. (2003) Global Public Goods from the CGIAR, Impact Assessment, Thematic Working Paper, World Bank (Operations Evaluation Department), Washington, DC.
15. Gardner, B., and W. Lesser (2003) ‘International Agricultural Research as a Global Public Good’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 692–97.
16. Grindle, M., and J. Thomas (1990) ‘After the Decision: Implementing Policy Reforms in Developing Countries’, World Development 18(8): 1163–81.
17. Hall, A., G. Bockett, S. Taylor and M. Sivamohan (2001) ‘Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor’, World Development 25(5): 783–97.
18. Hall, A., L.K. Mytelka and B. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka (2005) The Innovation Systems Concept: Implications for Agricultural Research Policy and Practice, ILAC Policy Brief no. 2, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
19. Hocdé, H., B. Triomphe, G. Faure and M. Duleire (2006) From Participation to Partnership, a Different Way for Researchers to Accompany Innovations Processes: Challenges and Difficulties, Paper presented at the Innovation Africa Symposium, Kampala, Uganda.
20. Horton, D., G. Prain and G. Thiele (2009) Perspectives on Partnership: A Literature Review, Social Sciences Working Paper no. 2009–3, International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.
21. Kanbur, R., T. Sandler, with K.M. Morrison (1999) The Future of Development Assistance: Common Pools and International Public Goods. Overseas Development Council, Policy Essay no. 25, Washington, DC.
22. Kaniaru, D. (2002) The Role of Institutions and Networks in Environmental Enforcement, 6th INECE Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, online: www.inece.org/conf/proceedings2/10-Role%20of%20Institutions.pdf (last accessed 11 May 2011).
23. Koontz, T.M., and C.W. Thomas (2006) ‘What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?’, Public Administration Review 66: 111–21.
24. Louafi, S. (2011) Co-management and Network Governance: The Role of the International Agronomic Research Centres in the Emergence and the Implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Paper presented at the XIème congrès de l’Association Française de Sciences Politiques, Strasbourg, September 2011.
25. Lundy, M., V. Gottret and J. Ashby (2005) Learning Alliances: An approach for Building Multistakeholder Innovation Systems, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Brief no. 8, ILAC Initiative, Rome.
26. McNie, E.C. (2007) ‘Reconciling the Supply of Scientific Information with User Demands: An Analysis of the Problem and Review of the Literature’, Environmental Science and Policy 10: 17–39.
27. Olson, Mancur (1971; originally published in 1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Pinstrup-Andersen, P., and T. Mengistu (2008) ‘Some Implications of Globalization for International Agricultural Research’, in J. von Braun and E. Diaz-Bonilla (eds), Globalization of Food and Agriculture and the Poor, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
30. Pistorius, R. (1997) Scientists, Plants and Politics: A History of the Plant Genetic Resources Movement, International Plant Genetic Research Institute, Rome.
31. Raustiala, K. (2002) ‘The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law’, Virginia Journal of International Law 43(1): 1–92.
32. Ryan, J. (2005) International Public Goods and the CGIAR Niche in the R for D Continuum: Operationalising Concepts, Revised draft of a discussion paper prepared for a brainstorming session between some members of the Science Council of the CGIAR and the Centre Deputy Directors’ Committee of the Future Harvest Centres of the CGIAR at the CGIAR Annual General Meeting in Morocco, 3 December.
33. Sagasti, F., and V. Timmer (2008) A Review of the CGIAR as a Provider of International Public Goods, System-wide review of CGIAR, Bioversity International, Rome.
34. Sandler, T. (2002) ‘Demand and Institutions for Regional Public Goods’, in A. Estevadeordal, B. Frantz and T.R. Nguyen (eds), Regional Public Goods: From Theory to Practice, Inter-American Development Bank and Asian Development Bank, Washington, DC.
35. System-wide Genetic Resources Programme (SGRP) (2010) Workshop on National Programmes and CGIAR Centres’ Cooperation to Implement the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 15–16 February, Bioversity International, Rome.
36. Tesfaye, B. (2008) How to Get Innovation System Work in Agriculture and Rural Development? Reflection on Methodological Issues, Paper presented at APPRI 2008 International Workshop, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 21–24 October.
37. Tesfaye, B. (2009) Innovation Systems in Agriculture and Rural Development, Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, online: http://knowledge.cta.int/en/Dossiers/Demanding-Innovation/Innovation-systems/Articles/Innovation-Systems-in-Agricultureand- Rural-Development (last accessed 11 May 2011).
38. Trommetter, M. (2009) Intellectual Property Right, International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and the Stakes for Food and Nutrition Security, Submission to the Special Rapporteur on Right to Food, online: www.fundp.ac.be/droit/crid/propriete/M.TROMMETTER_food%20and%20nutrition%20security (last accessed 11 May 2011).
39. van Kerkhoff, L., and L. Label (2006) ‘Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development’, Annual Review of Environmental Resources 31: 445–77.
40. Watts, J., et al. (2007) Institutional Learning and Change: An Introduction, ILAC Working Paper 3, Bioversity International, Rome.
41. Watts, J., and D. Horton (2008) Institutional Learning and Change: An Initiative to Promote Greater Impact through Agricultural Research for Poverty Alleviation, ILAC Working Paper 5, Bioversity International, Rome.
42. World Bank (2003) The CGIAR at 31: An Independent Meta-Evaluation of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, vol. 1, Overview report, World Bank (Operations Evaluation Department), Washington, DC.
43. World Bank (2007) Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems, Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.