Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

JAMA Neurology

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 73-80

  Nwachuku, Enyinna L ^a   Balzer, Jeffrey R ^a   Yabes, Jonathan G ^a   Habeych, Miguel E ^a   Crammond, Donald J ^a   Thirumala, Parthasarathy D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN INFARCTION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROPROTECTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; WAVEFORM; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CAROTID STENOSIS; META ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STROKE;

CAROTID STENOSIS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STROKE;

EID: 84921044517     PISSN: 21686149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3071     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Malcharek MJ, Ulkatan S, Marinò V, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of carotid endarterectomy by transcranial motor evoked potential: a multicenter study of 600 patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(5):1025-1030.
2. Pennekamp CW, Moll FL, de Borst GJ. The potential benefits and the role of cerebral monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(6):693-697.
3. Pulli R, Dorigo W, Barbanti E, et al. Carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: is this a higher risk subgroup? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24(1):63-68.
4. Reinert M, Mono ML, Kuhlen D, et al. Restenosis aftermicrosurgical non-patch carotid endarterectomy in 586 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(3):423-431, discussion 431.
5. Akhmedov AD, Usachev DIu, Lukchin VA, Shmigel'skiѤ AV, Beliaev AIu, Sosnin AD. Carotid endarterectomy in patients with high surgical risk [in Russian]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2013;77(4):36-41, discussion 41-42.
6. Baton O, Szym P, Hoffmann JJ, Borne M, Diraison Y, Baranger B. Cerebral monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid surgery: a review of 100 cases. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21(1):30-33.
7. Floriani M, Giulini SM, Muiesan P, et al. Influence of contralateral carotid artery on neurologic outcome after carotid endarterectomy. Ital J Surg Sci. 1989;19(4):381-386.
8. Hartmann A, Hupp T, Koch HC, et al. Prospective study on the complication rate of carotid surgery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9(3):152-156.
9. Kang J, Conrad MF, Patel VI, et al. Clinical and anatomic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(4):944-949.
10. Rowed DW, Houlden DA, Burkholder LM, Taylor AB. Comparison of monitoring techniques for intraoperative cerebral ischemia. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004;31(3):347-356.
11. Schwartz ML, Panetta TF, Kaplan BJ, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid surgery. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4(1):77-80.
12. Stejskal L, Kramár F, Ostrý S, Benes V, Mohapl M, Limberk B. Experience of 500 cases of neurophysiological monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149(7):681-688, discussion 689.
13. Guérit JM, Witdoeckt C, de Tourtchaninoff M, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery I: relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997; 104(6):459-469.
14. Pistolese GR, Ippoliti A, Appolloni A, Ronchey S, Faraglia V. Cerebral haemodynamics during carotid cross-clamping. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7(suppl A):33-38.
15. Haupt WF, Horsch S. Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: a review of 994 cases. Neurology. 1992;42(4):835-838.
16. Schweiger H, Kamp HD, Dinkel M. Somatosensory-evoked potentials during carotid artery surgery: experience in 400 operations. Surgery. 1991;109(5):602-609.
17. Beese U, Langer H, Lang W, Dinkel M. Comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy and somatosensory evoked potentials for the detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1998;29(10):2032-2037.
18. Uno M, Suzue A, Nishi K, Nagahiro S. Hemodynamic cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy evaluated by intraoperative monitoring and post-operative diffusion-weighted imaging. Neurol Res. 2007;29(1):70-77.
19. Hill MD, Brooks W, Mackey A, et al; CREST Investigators. Stroke after carotid stenting and endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Circulation. 2012;126(25):3054-3061.
20. Astarci P, Guerit JM, Robert A, et al. Stump pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials for predicting the use of shunt during carotid surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21(3):312-317.
21. Friedell ML, Clark JM, Graham DA, Isley MR, Zhang XF. Cerebral oximetry does not correlate with electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials in determining the need for shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(3):601-606.
22. Uno M, Nishi K, Shinno K, Nagahiro S. Carotid endarterectomy with external shunt: a new device and indication for use: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(5):1174-1177.
23. De Vleeschauwer P, Horsch S, Matamoros R. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery: results, usefulness and limitations of themethod. Ann Vasc Surg. 1988;2(1):63-68.
24. Linstedt U, Maier C, Petry A. Intraoperative monitoring with somatosensory evoked potentialsin carotid artery surgery: less reliable in patients with preoperative neurologic deficiency? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(1):13-16.
25. Manninen P, Sarjeant R, Joshi M. Posterior tibial nerve and median nerve somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51(9):937-941.
26. Manninen PH, Tan TK, Sarjeant RM. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy in patients with a stroke. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(1):39-44.
27. Prokop A, Meyer GP, Walter M, Erasmi H. Validity of SEP monitoring in carotid surgery: review and own results. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1996; 37(4):337-342.
28. Dinkel M, Schweiger H, Goerlitz P. Monitoring during carotid surgery: somatosensory evoked potentials vs carotid stump pressure. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1992;4(3):167-175.
29. Fava E, Bortolani E, Ducati A, Schieppati M. Role of SEP in identifying patients requiring temporary shunt during carotid endarterectomy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;84(5):426-432.
30. Fried SJ, Smith DM, Legatt AD. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: does reference choice matter? J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;31(1):55-57.
31. Horsch S, De Vleeschauwer P, Ktenidis K. Intraoperative assessment of cerebral ischemia during carotid surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1990;31(5):599-602.
32. Lacroix H, Beyens G, Van Hemelrijck J, Nevelsteen A, Verhaeghe R, Suy R. Is transcranial Doppler useful in the detection of internal carotid artery cross-clamp intolerance? Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;7(2):203-207.
33. Pedrini L, Tarantini S, Cirelli MR, Ballester A, Cifiello BI, D'Addato M. Intraoperative assessment of cerebral ischaemia during carotid surgery. Int Angiol. 1998;17(1):10-14.
34. Witdoeckt C, Ghariani S, Guérit JM. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery, II: comparison between qualitative and quantitative scoring systems. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(4):328-332.
35. Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S, et al; ICSS-MRI study group. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(4):353-362.
36. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(10):982-990.
37. van Enst WA, Ochodo E, Scholten RJ, Hooft L, Leeflang MM. Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: ameta-epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):70.
38. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample sizeeffects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(9):882-893.
39. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-536.
40. Doebler P. Mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy (Mada). R package version 0.5.5. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed July 14, 2014.
41. Astrup J, Symon L, Branston NM, Lassen NA. Cortical evoked potential and extracellular K+ and H+ at critical levels of brain ischemia. Stroke. 1977;8(1):51-57.
42. Branston NM, Symon L, Crockard HA, Pasztor E. Relationship between the cortical evoked potential and local cortical blood flow following acutemiddle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon. Exp Neurol. 1974;45(2):195-208.
43. Astrup J, Blennow G, Nilsson B. Effects of reduced cerebral blood flow upon EEG pattern, cerebral extracellular potassium, and energy metabolism in the rat cortex during bicuculline-induced seizures. Brain Res. 1979;177(1):115-126.
44. Symon L. The relationship between CBF, evoked potentials and the clinical features in cerebral ischaemia. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1980;78:175-190.
45. Branston NM, Symon L, Strong AJ. Reversibility of ischaemically induced changes in extracellular potassium in primate cortex. J Neurol Sci. 1978;37(1-2):37-49.