Hydrodynamics in graphene: Linear-response transport

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Narozhny, B N ^a,b   Gornyi, I V ^a,c   Titov, M ^d   Schutt M ^e   Mirlin, A D ^a,f  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY MEPHI   (Russian Federation)

^c IOFFE INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e University of Minnesota   (United States)

^f PETERSBURG NUCLEAR PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921033444     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.035414     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Physical Kinetics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981).
2. S. Chapman, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 216, 279 (1916); PTRMAD 1364-503X 10.1098/rsta.1916.0006
3. S. Chapman, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 217, 115 (1918); PTRMAD 1364-503X 10.1098/rsta.1918.0005
4. D. Enskog, Ark. f. Mat., Astr. och Fysik (Stockholm) 16, 60 (1922);
5. S. G. Brush, Kinetic Theory: The Chapman-Enskog Solution of the Transport Equation for Moderately Dense Gases, Vol. 3 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1972).
6. H. Grad, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 2, 331 (1949). 0010-3640 10.1002/cpa.3160020403
7. A. B. Kashuba, Phys. Rev. B 78, 085415 (2008). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.085415
8. S. A. Hartnoll, P. K. Kovtun, M. Müller, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 76, 144502 (2007). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.144502
9. M. Müller and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115419 (2008). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115419
10. M. Müller, L. Fritz, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115406 (2008). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115406
11. L. Fritz, J. Schmalian, M. Müller, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 78, 085416 (2008) PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.085416;
12. M. Müller, J. Schmalian, and L. Fritz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 025301 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.025301
13. M. S. Foster and I. L. Aleiner, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085415 (2009). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.085415
14. D. Svintsov, V. Vyurkov, S. Yurchenko, T. Otsuji, and V. Ryzhii, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 083715 (2012). JAPIAU 0021-8979 10.1063/1.4705382
15. M. Schütt, P. M. Ostrovsky, M. Titov, I. V. Gornyi, B. N. Narozhny, and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 026601 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.026601
16. A. Tomadin and M. Polini, Phys. Rev. B 88, 205426 (2013). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.205426
17. D. Svintsov, V. Vyurkov, V. Ryzhii, and T. Otsuji, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245444 (2013). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245444
18. M. Schütt, P. M. Ostrovsky, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. B 83, 155441 (2011). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.155441
19. A. Tomadin, D. Brida, G. Cerullo, A. C. Ferrari, and M. Polini, Phys. Rev. B 88, 035430 (2013). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.035430
20. R. V. Gorbachev, A. K. Geim, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novo-selov, T. Tudorovskiy, I. V. Grigorieva, A. H. MacDonald, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and L. A. Ponomarenko, Nat. Phys. 8, 896 (2012). 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys2441
21. S. Kim, I. Jo, J. Nah, Z. Yao, S. K. Banerjee, and E. Tutuc, Phys. Rev. B 83, 161401 (R) (2011). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.161401
22. S. Kim and E. Tutuc, Solid State Comm. 152, 1283 (2012). SSCOA4 0038-1098 10.1016/j.ssc.2012.04.032
23. M. Titov, R. V. Gorbachev, B. N. Narozhny, T. Tudorovskiy, M. Schütt, P. M. Ostrovsky, I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, and L. A. Ponomarenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 166601 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.166601
24. K. Seeger, Semiconductor Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
25. The fact that a complete theory should be based on a three-mode approximation has been pointed out in Ref. [22] in the context of relativistic hydrodynamics.
26. M. Müller, L. Fritz, S. Sachdev, and J. Schmalian, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 170 (2009). 10.1063/1.3149488
27. J. Ping, I. Yudhistira, N. Ramakrishnan, S. Cho, S. Adam, and M. S. Fuhrer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 047206 (2014). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.047206
28. S. Cho and M. S. Fuhrer, Phys. Rev. B 77, 081402 (R) (2008). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.081402
29. J. Jobst, Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2012.
30. J. Bai, R. Cheng, F. Xiu, L. Liao, M. Wang, A. Shailos, K. L. Wang, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Nature Nanotech. 5, 655 (2010). 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2010.154
31. K. Gopinadhan, Y. J. Shin, I. Yudhistira, J. Niu, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195429 (2013). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.195429
32. Y. Zhao, P. Cadden-Zimansky, F. Ghahari, and P. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 106804 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.106804
33. J. B. Oostinga, B. Sacepe, M. F. Craciun, and A. F. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. B 81, 193408 (2010). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.193408
34. P. S. Alekseev, A. P. Dmitriev, I. V. Gornyi, V. Yu. Kachorovsky, B. N. Narozhny, M. Schütt, and M. Titov, arXiv:1410.4982.
35. J. C. W. Song and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 126601 (2013) PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.126601;
36. J. C. W. Song, D. A. Abanin, and L. S. Levitov, Nanolett. 13, 3631 (2013). NALEFD 1530-6984 10.1021/nl401475u
37. B. N. Narozhny, M. Titov, I. V. Gornyi, and P. M. Ostrovsky, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195421 (2012). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.195421
38. W.-K. Tse, B. Yu-K. Hu, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 76, 081401 (R) (2007). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.081401
39. B. L. Altshuler and A. G. Aronov, in Electron-Electron Interactions in Disordered Systems, edited by A. L. Efros and M. Pollak (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).
40. G. Zala, B. N. Narozhny, and I. L. Aleiner, Phys. Rev. B 64, 214204 (2001). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.214204
41. V. V. Cheianov and V. I. Fal'ko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 226801 (2006). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.226801
42. Note that in disorder-dominated regime (Equation presented), energy dependence of the impurity scattering time is important and, in particular, close to the neutrality point it determines the dependence of transport coefficients on the magnetic field, see P. S. Alekseev, A. P. Dmitriev, I. V. Gornyi, and V. Yu. Kachorovskii, Phys. Rev. B 87, 165432 (2013). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165432
43. U. Briskot, M. Schütt, I. V. Gornyi, B. N. Narozhny, and A. D. Mirlin (unpublished).
44. E. H. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115449 (2008). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115449
45. S. Fratini and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. B 77, 195415 (2008). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.195415
46. R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 206410 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.206410
47. S. S. Kubakaddi, Phys. Rev. B 79, 075417 (2009). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.075417
48. W. K. Tse and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 79, 235406 (2009). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235406
49. J. K. Viljas and T. T. Heikkilä, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245404 (2010). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.245404
50. J. C. W. Song, M. Y. Reizer, and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106602 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106602
51. V. Guttal and D. Stroud, Phys. Rev. B 71, 201304 (R) (2005). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.201304
52. R. Magier and D. J. Bergman, Phys. Rev. B 74, 094423 (2006). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.094423
53. The collinear scattering singularity is a consequence of the linear dispersion of Dirac quasiparticles in graphene. At the golden-rule level, the collision integral diverges logarithmically [4,6,8,11,49]. This divergence is regularized by screening of the Coulomb interaction [14,15,49]. As a result, the collision integral becomes proportional to (Equation presented) (where (Equation presented) is the effective interaction constant in graphene). A large value of (Equation presented) allows us to separate slowly relaxing modes retained in the hydrodynamic approximation from all other modes that are characterized by the large relaxation rates enhanced by this large parameter. While the bare value of (Equation presented) in pristine graphene is of order unity, there are two reasons for its suppression: (i) the dielectric constant of the substrate and (ii) downward renormalization [50] of (Equation presented). Indeed, experiments confirm [51-53] that the electron-electron interaction constant is quite weak.
54. M. Schütt, Ph.D. Thesis, KIT, 2013.
55. J. Gonzalez, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 595 (1994). NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90410-3
56. A. A. Kozikov, A. K. Savchenko, B. N. Narozhny, and A. V. Shytov, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075424 (2010). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.075424
57. J. P. Reed, B. Uchoa, Y. I. Joe, Y. Gan, D. Casa, E. Fradkin, and P. Abbamonte, Science 330, 805 (2010). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1190920
58. J. Jobst, D. Waldmann, I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and H. B. Weber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 106601 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.106601