Preoperative FDG-PET Predicts Early Recurrence and a Poor Prognosis After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 677-684

  Yamamoto, Tatsuma ^a   Sugiura, Teiichi ^a   Mizuno, Takashi ^a   Okamura, Yukiyasu ^a   Aramaki, Takeshi ^a   Endo, Masahiro ^a   Uesaka, Katsuhiko ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CA 19-9 ANTIGEN; CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURVIVAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIVER METASTASIS; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS RESECTION; PET SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; TUMOR VOLUME; ADENOCARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC USE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; SCINTISCANNING; SURVIVAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; ROC CURVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84921026509     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4046-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Massucco P, Ribero D, Sgotto E, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in pancreatic head cancer treated with extended lymphadenectomy: not just a matter of numbers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(12):3323–32.
2. Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007;141(5):610–8.
3. Slidell MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, et al. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):165–74.
4. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Number of metastatic lymph nodes, but not lymph node ratio, is an independent prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(2):196–204.
5. Kato K, Yamada S, Sugimoto H, et al. Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: influence of resection margin status on survival. Pancreas. 2009;38(6):605–12.
6. Hallemeier CL, Botros M, Corsini MM, et al. Preoperative CA 19-9 level is an important prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with surgical resection and adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34(6):567–72.
7. Waraya M, Yamashita K, Katagiri H, et al. Preoperative serum CA19-9 and dissected peripancreatic tissue margin as determiners of long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1231–40.
8. Hatano E, Ikai I, Higashi T, et al. Preoperative positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose is predictive of prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. World J Surg. 2006;30(9):1736–41.
9. Furukawa H, Ikuma H, Asakura K, Uesaka K. Prognostic importance of standardized uptake value on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in biliary tract carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100(6):494–9.
10. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, et al. Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of 125 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(10):3201–6.
11. van Westreenen HL, Plukker JT, Cobben DC, et al. Prognostic value of the standardized uptake value in esophageal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(2):436–40.
12. Oshida M, Uno K, Suzuki M, et al. Predicting the prognoses of breast carcinoma patients with positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-fluoro[18F]-d-glucose. Cancer. 1998;82(11):2227–34.
13. Okamoto K, Koyama I, Miyazawa M, et al. Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts early recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011;16(1):39–44.
14. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Witterkind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.
15. Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schafer M, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):235–43.
16. Ruf J, Lopez Hanninen E, Oettle H, et al. Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology. 2005;5(2–3):266–72.
17. Schellenberg D, Quon A, Minn AY, et al. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose PET is prognostic of progression-free and overall survival in locally advanced pancreas cancer treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(5):1420–5.
18. Heinrich S, Schafer M, Weber A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generates a significant tumor response in resectable pancreatic cancer without increasing morbidity: results of a prospective phase II trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248(6):1014-1022.
19. Maemura K, Takao S, Shinchi H, et al. Role of positron emission tomography in decisions on treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(5):435–41.
20. Pedrazzoli S, Sperti C, Pasquali C, et al. Comparison of International Consensus Guidelines versus 18-FDG PET in detecting malignancy of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):971–6.
21. Zimny M, Fass J, Bares R, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(8):883–8.
22. Nakata B, Chung YS, Nishimura S, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1997;79(4):695–9.
23. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Chierichetti F, et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(8):953–959; discussion 959-960.
24. Nakata B, Nishimura S, Ishikawa T, et al. Prognostic predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with pancreatic cancer. Int J Oncol. 2001;19(1):53–8.
25. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Ayabe K, et al. FDG PET in the evaluation of the aggressiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathological features. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21(8):707–14.
26. Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U, et al. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(7):1337–44.
27. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(6):567–79.
28. Shimada K, Nara S, Esaki M, et al. Intrapancreatic nerve invasion as a predictor for recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2011;40(3):464–8.
29. Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Kanemoto H, et al. Serum CA19-9 is a significant predictor among preoperative parameters for early recurrence after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(5):977–85.
30. Yamazoe Y, Maetani S, Onodera H, et al. Histopathological prediction of liver metastasis after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 1992;1(3):237–44.
31. Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, Gotoh K, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2013;258(6):1040–50.
32. Motoi F, Ishida K, Fujishima F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 for resectable and borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results from a prospective multi-institutional phase 2 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(12):3794–801.
33. Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, Ishikawa O, et al. Serum CA19-9 alterations during preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation therapy for resectable invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas as an indicator for therapeutic selection and survival. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):461–9.
34. Diederichs CG, Staib L, Glatting G, et al. FDG PET: elevated plasma glucose reduces both uptake and detection rate of pancreatic malignancies. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(6):1030–3.
35. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for performing FDG-PET/CT in oncology. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2007.