Evidence-informed health policy 2 -Survey of organizations that support the use of research evidence

Implementation Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Lavis, John N ^a,b   Paulsen, Elizabeth J ^c   Oxman, Andrew D ^c   Moynihan, Ray ^d  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921001700     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Evidence-informed health policy 1 -Synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. JN Lavis AD Oxman R Moynihan EJ Paulsen, Implementation Science 2008 3 53 10.1186/1748-5908-3-53 19091107
2. R Moynihan AD Oxman JN Lavis E Paulsen, Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier -Report from the Kunnskapssenteret (Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services), No. 1-2008 Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services 2008
3. Medical practice guidelines: Current activities and future directions. A Audet S Greenfield M Field, Annals of Internal Medicine 1990 113 709 714 2221652
4. Format and conduct of consensus development conferences. EA McGlynn J Kosecoff RH Brook, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1990 6 450 469 2228459
5. Developing clinical practice guidelines: The European experience. R Grol M Eccles H Maisonneuve S Woolf, Disease Management and Health Outcomes 1998 4 355 366 10.2165/00115677-199804050-00002
6. R Engelbrecht S Courte-Wienecke, A Survey on the Current State of Development, Dissemination and Implementation of Guidelines of Clinical Practice in European countries Neuherberg: GSF -National Research Center for Environment and Health 1999
7. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. SH Woolf RP Grol A Hutchinson M Eccles JM Grimshaw, British Medical Journal 1999 318 527 530 10024268
8. Guideline development in Europe: An international comparison. The Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) Collaborative Group, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000 16 1039 1049 10.1017/S0266462300103101 11187086
9. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: An international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. JS Burgers R Grol NS Klazinga M Makela J Zaat Collaboration AGREE, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2003 15 31 45 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.31 12630799
10. The state of the science and art of practice guidelines development, dissemination and evaluation in Canada. ID Graham S Beardall AO Carter J Tetroe B Davies, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2003 9 195 202 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00385.x 12787183
11. The status of health technology assessment worldwide: Results of an international survey. S Perry E Gardner M Thamer, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1997 13 81 98 9119626
12. Health technology assessment: Decentralized and fragmented in the US compared to other countries. S Perry M Thamer, Health Policy 1997 40 177 198 10.1016/S0168-8510(97)00897-X 10168751
13. The European way to health technology assessment. Lessons from an evaluation of EUR-ASSESS. F Sassi, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000 16 282 290 10.1017/S0266462300161240 10815373
14. Joint project of the international network of agencies for health technology assessment-Part 1: Survey results on diffusion, assessment, and clinical use of positron emission tomography. J Hastings EJ Adams, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2006 22 143 148 10.1017/S026646230605094X 16571188
15. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? JN Lavis D Robertson JM Woodside CB McLeod J Abelson, Milbank Quarterly 2003 81 221 248 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052 12841049
16. Evidence-informed health policy 3 -Interviews with the directors of organizations that support the use of research evidence. JN Lavis AD Oxman R Moynihan EJ Paulsen, Implementation Science 2008 3 55 10.1186/1748-5908-3-55 19091109
17. Evidence-informed health policy 4 -Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence. JN Lavis R Moynihan AD Oxman EJ Paulsen, Implementation Science 2008 3 56 10.1186/1748-5908-3-56 19091110
18. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. P Edwards I Roberts M Clarke C DiGuiseppi S Pratap R Wentz I Kwan R Cooper, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 18 2 MR000008
19. Are guidelines following guidelines?: The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelings in the peer-reviewed medical literature. TM Shaneyfelt MF Mayo-Smith J Rothwangl, Journal of American Medical Association 1999 281 1900 1905 10.1001/jama.281.20.1900
20. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: The need for a critical appraisal. R Grilli N Magrini A Penna G Mura A Liberati, Lancet 2000 355 103 106 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02171-6 10675167
21. Health technology assessment in Canada: A decade in review. D Menon L-A Topfer, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000 16 896 902 10.1017/S0266462300102168 11028144
22. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: Evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. JS Burgers FA Cluzeau SE Hanna C Hunt R Grol, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003 19 148 157 10.1017/S026646230300014X 12701947
23. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. A Garcia-Altes S Ondategui-Parra PJ Neumann, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2004 20 300 310 10.1017/S0266462304001126 15446760
24. Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: Diversification of producers and contextualization of findings. P Lehoux S Tailliez J-L Denis M Hivon, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2004 20 325 336 10.1017/S026646230400114X 15446762