Practice improvement collaboratives: An overview

Implementing Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Alcohol and Drug Disorders

Volumn 24, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-14

  Cotter, Frances ^a   Bowler, Suzanne ^b   Mulkern, Virginia ^c   McCarty, Dennis ^d  

^a Center for Substance Abuse Treatment   (United States)

^b Northrop Grumman Health Solutions ^*  (United States)

^c Human Services Research Institute   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Application of research to practice; Evidence based practices; Practice improvement collaboratives

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920989111     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1300/J069v24S01_01     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Millenson ML. Demanding Medical Excellence. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. 1997.
2. Institute of Medicine. Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Research: Forging Partnerships with Community-Based Drug and Alcohol Treatment. Washington, DC. National Academy Press. 1998.
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Changing the Conversation–Improving Substance Abuse Treatment: The National Treatment Plan Initiative. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Rockville, MD. 2000; Report No: DHHS Publication No. SMA-00-3479.
4. Backer TE, Rogers EM, Sopory P. Designing Health Communication Campaigns: What Works? Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. CA. 1992.
5. Backer TE, David SL. Synthesis of behavioral science learnings about technology transfer. In: Backer TE, David SL, Soucy G. Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer. Rockville, MD. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 1995; pp. 262-279.
6. Brown BS. From research to practice: The bridge is out and the water’s rising. Advances in Medical Sociology. 2000; 7:345-365.
7. Morgenstern J. Effective technology transfer in alcoholism treatment. Substance Use & Misuse. 2000; 35:1659-1678.
8. Butterfoss FD, Goohman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research. 1993; 8(3):315-330.
9. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly. 1996; 23(1):65-79.
10. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health. 1998; 19:173-202.
11. Jensen PS, Hoagwood KB, Trickett EJ. Ivory towers or earthen trenches? Community collaborations to foster real-world research. Applied Developmental Science. 1999; 3(4):206-212.
12. Torrey WC, Drake RE, Dixon L, Burns BJ, Flynn L, Rush AJ, Clark RE, Klatzker D. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services. 2001; 52(1):45-50.
13. Giesbrecht N, Rankin J. Reducing alcohol problems through community action research projects: Contexts, strategies, implications, and challenges. Substance Use & Misue. 2000; 35(1 - 2):31-53.
14. Allamani A, Casswell S, Graham K, Holder HD, Holmila M, Larsson S, Nygaard P. Introduction: Community action research and the prevention of alcohol problems at the local level. Substance Use & Misuse. 2000; 35(1 - 2):1-10.
15. Yin RK, Kaftarian SJ. Introduction: Challenges of community-based program outcome evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1997; 20(3):293-297.
16. Rahdert ER. Introduction to the perinatal-20 treatment research demonstration program. Treatment for drug-exposed women and their children: Advances in Research Methodology. Rockville, MD. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 1996. pp.1-5.
17. Argeriou M, McCarty D. The use of shelters as substance abuse stabilization sites. Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1993; 20:126-137.
18. Conrad KJ, Hultman CI, Lyons JS. Treatment of the Chemically Dependent Homeless: Theory and Implementation in Fourteen American Projects. Binghamton, NY: Haworh Press. 1993.
19. Guydish J, Muck R. Reorganizing publicly funded drug abuse treatment: The experience of ten target cities projects. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1999; 31(3): 273-278.
20. Orwin RG. Assessing program fidelity in substance abuse health services research. Addiction. 2000; 95(Supplement 3):S309-S327.
21. Bond GR, Evans L, Salyers MP, Williams J, Kim HW. Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research. 2000; 2(2):75-85.
22. Addiction Technology Transfer Centers, The Change Book: A Blueprint for Technology Transfer. Kansas City, MO. Addiction Technology Transfer Center National Office. 2000.
23. Brown BS. Reducing impediments to technology transfer in drug abuse programming.
24. Backer TE, David SL, Soucy G. Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer. Rockville, MD. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 1995.
25. Mattessich P, Monsey BR. Collaboration: What Makes It Work–A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. St. Paul, MN. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation. 1992.
26. Stoil MJ, Hill GA, Jansen, MA, Sambrano S, Winn FJ. Benefits of community- based demonstration efforts: Knowledge gained in substance abuse prevention. Journal of Community Psychology 2000;28(4):375-389.
27. Room R. Community action and alcohol problems: The demonstration project as an unstable mixture.
28. Giesbrecht N, Conley P, Denniston RW, Gliksman L, Holder H, Pederson A, Room R, Shain M. Research, Action, and the Community: Experiences in the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems. Rockville, MD: Office for Substance Abuse Prevention; 1990, pp.1-25.
29. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Bridging the Gap: Developing Community- Based Practice/Research Collaboratives. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 1999. Report No.: Guidance for Applications (GFA) No. TI 99-006.
30. Maccoby M. Why Work: Motivating and Leading the New Generation. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.; 1989.
31. Diamond MA. Organizational change as human process, not technique.
32. Backer TE, David SL, Soucy G. Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995. pp.119-131.
33. Backer TE. Assessing and enhancing readiness for change: Implications for behavior change.
34. Backer TE, David SL, Soucy G. Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995.