The rhizosphere and hyphosphere differ in their impacts on carbon and nitrogen cycling in forests exposed to elevated CO2

New Phytologist

Volumn 205, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1164-1174

  Meier, Ina C ^a,d   Pritchard, Seth G ^b   Brzostek, Edward R ^a   Mccormack, M Luke ^c   Phillips, Richard P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b School of Business   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Duke free air carbon enrichment(FACE) experiment; Exudation; Hyphosphere; Land carbon sink; Progressive nutrient limitation; Rhizosphere priming effects

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FUNGUS; GROWING SEASON; HYDROSPHERE; NITROGEN CYCLE; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; SOIL TYPE;

FUNGI; PINUS TAEDA;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; FERTILIZER; NITROGEN; SOIL;

BIOCATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; ENZYMOLOGY; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FOREST; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; NITROGEN CYCLE; PINE; PLANT ROOT; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL; UNITED STATES; WATER CYCLE;

BIOCATALYSIS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FERTILIZERS; FORESTS; NITROGEN; NITROGEN CYCLE; NORTH CAROLINA; PINUS; PLANT ROOTS; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL; WATER CYCLE;

EID: 84920982281     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13122     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Allison SD. 2006. Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes. Biogeochemistry 38: 1178-1187.
2. Allison SD, Vitousek PM. 2005. Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37: 937-944.
3. Baldrian P. 2006. Fungal laccases - occurrence and properties. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 30: 215-242.
4. Baldrian P, Šnajdr J, Merhautová V, Dobiášová P, Cajthaml T, Valášková V. 2013. Responses of the extracellular enzyme activities in hardwood forest to soil temperature and seasonality and the potential effects of climate change. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 56: 60-68.
5. Bengtson P, Barker J, Grayston SJ. 2012. Evidence of a strong coupling between root exudation, C and N availability, and stimulated SOM decomposition caused by rhizosphere priming effects. Ecology and Evolution 2: 1843-1852.
6. 2 and N fertilization. Global Change Biology 14: 1025-1036.
7. Briar SS, Fonte SJ, Park I, Six J, Scow K, Ferris H. 2011. The distribution of nematodes and soil microbial communities across soil aggregate fractions and farm management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43: 905-914.
8. Burke RM, Cairney JWG. 2002. Laccases and other polyphenol oxidases in ecto- and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 12: 105-116.
9. 2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 18866-18870.
10. 2 leads to loss of soil carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 4990-4995.
11. Cheng W, Parton B, Gonzalez-Meyer MA, McNickle GG, Phillips RP, Brzostek E, Jastrow J. 2013. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. New Phytologist 201: 31-44.
12. Claus H. 2003. Laccases and their occurrence in prokaryotes. Archives of Microbiology 179: 145-150.
13. Courty PE, Bréda N, Garbaye J. 2007. Relation between oak tree phenology and the secretion of organic matter degrading enzymes by Lactarius quietus ectomycorrhizas before and during bud break. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39: 1655-1663.
14. Courty PE, Franc A, Garbaye J. 2010. Temporal and functional pattern of secreted enzyme activities in an ectomycorrhizal community. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 42: 2022-2025.
15. Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, Morgan JA. 2013. Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology 4: 1-8.
16. 2 depends on soil aggregate size. Global Change Biology 15: 1603-1614.
17. Drake JE, Darby BA, Giasson MA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP, Finzi AC. 2013. Stoichiometry constrains microbial response to root exudation-insights from a model and a field experiment in a temperate forest. Biogeosciences 10: 821-838.
18. 2. Ecology Letters 14: 349-357.
19. 2 and N fertilization. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 165: 43-52.
20. 2 and N fertilization. Plant, Cell & Environment 31: 1663-1672.
21. 2 enrichment stimulates N-mineralization and enzyme activities in calcareous grassland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35: 965-972.
22. 2 enrichment. Oecologia 132: 567-578.
23. Finzi AC, Sinsabaugh RL, Long TM, Osgood MP. 2006. Microbial community response to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm-temperate forest. Ecosystems 9: 215-226.
24. 2: contrasting responses in evergreen and deciduous trees explained by a common principle. Global Change Biology 15: 132-144.
25. 2 enrichment. Tree Physiology 25: 1399-1408.
26. Hart SC, Nason GE, Myrold DD, Perry DA. 1994. Dynamics of gross nitrogen transformations in an old-growth forest: the carbon connection. Ecology 75: 880-891.
27. Heimann M, Reichstein M. 2008. Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature 451: 289-292.
28. 2. Global Change Biology 5: 293-309.
29. 2, N deposition and climate change on extracellular enzyme activity and soil density fractionation in a California annual grassland. Global Change Biology 11: 1808-1815.
30. Herman DJ, Johnson KK, Jaeger CH III, Schwartz E, Firestone MK. 2006. Root influence on nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in Avena barbata rhizosphere soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70: 1504-1511.
31. Herman J, Moorhead D, Berg B. 2008. The relationship between rates of lignin and cellulose decay in aboveground forest litter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40: 2620-2626.
32. Högberg P, Read DJ. 2006. Towards a more plant physiological perspective on soil ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 548-554.
33. IPCC. 2013. Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, eds. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution Of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
34. 2 fluxes after a decade of carbon dioxide enrichment in a warm-temperate forest. Ecology 90: 3352-3366.
35. 2 on fen peat biogeochemistry. Science of the Total Environment 279: 45-50.
36. 2 gradient experiment. Ecosphere 2: art96.
37. Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 42: 1363-1371.
38. 2 evolution, nitrogen transformations and ATP content of rhizosphere and bulk soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38: 509-516.
39. 2. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41: 54-60.
40. Larson JL, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL. 2002. Extracellular enzyme activity beneath temperate trees growing under elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Soil Science of America Journal 66: 1848-1856.
41. Lindahl BD, de Boer W, Finlay RD. 2010. Disruption of root carbon transport into forest humus stimulates fungal opportunists at the expense of mycorrhizal fungi. ISME Journal 4: 872-881.
42. Marschner P, Marhan S, Kandeler E. 2012. Microscale distribution and function of soil microorganisms in the interface between rhizosphere and detritusphere. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 49: 174-183.
43. 2 in a model regenerating longleaf pine-wiregrass ecosystem. Ecosystems 13: 901-916.
44. Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL. 2006. A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecological Monographs 76: 151-174.
45. 2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 19368-19373.
46. 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42: 181-203.
47. Oh NH, Richter DD. 2005. Elemental translocation and loss from three highly weathered soil-bedrock profiles in the southeastern United States. Geoderma 126: 5-25.
48. 2 efflux. Global Change Biology 20: 1146-1160.
49. 2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411: 469-472.
50. Ostle NJ, Smith P, Fisher R, Woodward FI, Fisher JB, Smith JU, Galbraith D, Levy P, Meir P, McNamara NP et al. 2009. Integrating plant-soil interactions into global carbon cycle models. Journal of Ecology 97: 851-863.
51. Parkin TB. 1987. Soil microsites as a source of denitrification variability. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51: 1194-1199.
52. Phillips RP, Erlitz Y, Bier R, Bernhardt ES. 2008. New approach for capturing soluble root exudates in forest soils. Functional Ecology 22: 990-999.
53. 2 fumigation. Ecology Letters 14: 187-194.
54. 2. Ecology Letters 15: 1042-1049.
55. 2-enrichment: a six-year-minirhizotron study. Global Change Biology 14: 588-602.
56. 2-enrichment (FACE). Global Change Biology 14: 1252-1264.
57. 2 enrichment and soil N fertilization for 6 years. Global Change Biology 20: 1313-1326.
58. Rabinovich ML, Bolobova AV, Vasil'chenko LG. 2004. Fungal decomposition of natural aromatic structures and xenobiotics: a review. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 40: 1-17.
59. 2. Nature 440: 922-925.
60. 2 enrichment in two California annual grasslands. Oecologia 119: 572-577.
61. Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR. 2002. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 34: 1309-1315.
62. 2 atmosphere alters carbon assimilation and allocation in a pine forest ecosystem. Global Change Biology 9: 1378-1400.
63. 15N-labelled rhizodeposition of Lolium perenne as function of the distance to the root surface. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 42: 910-918.
64. Schimel JP, Bennett J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85: 591-602.
65. Schimel JP, Weintraub MN. 2003. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35: 549-563.
66. 2 concentration (canopy FACE). Global Change Biology 18: 757-768.
67. 2 enrichment of a loblolly pine forest. In: Nösberger J, Long SP, Norby RJ, Stitt M, Hendrey GR, Blum H, eds. Managed ecosystems and CO2 case atudies, processes and perspectives. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Ecological Studies 187: 197-212.
68. Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME et al. 2008. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters 11: 1252-1264.
69. Talbot JM, Allison SD, Treseder KK. 2008. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change. Functional Ecology 22: 955-963.
70. Talbot JM, Bruns TD, Smith DP, Branco S, Glassman SI, Erlandson S, Vilgalys R, Peay KG. 2013. Independent roles of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic communities in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 57: 282-291.
71. Talbot JM, Treseder KK. 2010. Controls over mycorrhizal uptake of organic nitrogen. Pedobiologia 53: 169-179.
72. 2 enrichment. Biogeosciences 8: 3077-3092.
73. Taylor BN, Beidler KV, Strand AE, Pritchard SG. 2014a. Improved scaling of minirhizotron data using an empirically-derived depth of field and correcting for the underestimation of root diameters. Plant and Soil 374: 941-948.
74. 2 enrichment and 6 years of N fertilization in a warm temperate forest. Tree Physiology 34: 955-965.
75. 2 fertilization and climate variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 21: 1-15.
76. Weintraub MN, Scott-Denton LE, Schmidt SK, Monson RK. 2007. The effects of tree rhizodeposition on soil exoenzyme activity, dissolved organic carbon, and nutrient availability in a subalpine forest ecosystem. Oecologia 154: 327-338.
77. 3 alter competition for soil nitrogen in developing forests. Global Change Biology 18: 1480-1488.