Ctk1 function is necessary for full translation initiation activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 86-95

  Coordes, Britta ^a,b,g   Brünger, Katharina M ^a,b   Burger, Kaspar ^b,d,h   Soufi, Boumediene ^e,f,i   Horenk, Juliane ^a,b,j   Eick, Dirk ^b,d   Olsen, Jesper V ^e,f   Sträßer, Katja ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science   (Germany)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^g NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^j FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRICKET PARALYSIS VIRUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CTDK-I PROTEIN COMPLEX, S CEREVISIAE; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

GENETICS; METABOLISM; RIBOSOME SUBUNIT; RNA TRANSLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

PEPTIDE CHAIN INITIATION, TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN KINASES; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84920973167     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00106-14     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. 2009. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 136:731–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042.
2. Lorsch JR, Dever TE. 2010. Molecular view of 43 S complex formation and start site selection in eukaryotic translation initiation. J Biol Chem 285:21203–21207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R110.119743.
3. Jackson RJ, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. 2010. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:113–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2838.
4. Hinnebusch AG, Dever TE, Asano K. 2007. Mechanism of translation initiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p 225–268. In Mathews MB, Sonenberg N, Hershey JWB (ed), Translational control in biology and medicine, vol 48. Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Series 48. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, NY.
5. Asano K, Clayton J, Shalev A, Hinnebusch AG. 2000. A multifactor complex of eukaryotic initiation factors, eIF1, eIF2, eIF3, eIF5, and initiator tRNA(Met) is an important translation initiation intermediate in vivo. Genes Dev 14:2534–2546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.831800.
6. Hinnebusch AG, Lorsch JR. 2012. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation: new insights and challenges. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a011544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a011544.
7. Aitken CE, Lorsch JR. 2012. A mechanistic overview of translation initiation in eukaryotes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:568–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2303.
8. Hellen CU. 2009. IRES-induced conformational changes in the ribosome and the mechanism of translation initiation by internal ribosomal entry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789:558–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.06.001.
9. Fernandez IS, Bai XC, Murshudov G, Scheres SH, Ramakrishnan V. 2014. Initiation of translation by cricket paralysis virus IRES requires its translocation in the ribosome. Cell 157:823–831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.015.
10. Gilbert WV, Zhou K, Butler TK, Doudna JA. 2007. Cap-independent translation is required for starvation-induced differentiation in yeast. Science 317:1224–1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1144467.
11. Gilbert WV. 2010. Alternative ways to think about cellular internal ribosome entry. J Biol Chem 285:29033–29038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R110.150532.
12. Buratowski S. 2009. Progression through the RNA polymerase II CTD cycle. Mol Cell 36:541–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.019.
13. Lenstra TL, Tudek A, Clauder S, Xu Z, Pachis ST, van Leenen D, Kemmeren P, Steinmetz LM, Libri D, Holstege FC. 2013. The role of Ctk1 kinase in termination of small non-coding RNAs. PLoS One 8:e80495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080495.
14. Bouchoux C, Hautbergue G, Grenetier S, Carles C, Riva M, Goguel V. 2004.CTDkinase I is involved inRNApolymerase I transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 32:5851–5860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh927.
15. Grenetier S, Bouchoux C, Goguel V. 2006. CTD kinase I is required for the integrity of the rDNA tandem array. Nucleic Acids Res 34:4996–5006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl493.
16. Rother S, Strasser K. 2007. The RNA polymerase II CTD kinase Ctk1 functions in translation elongation. Genes Dev 21:1409–1421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.428407.
17. Eustice DC, Wakem LP, Wilhelm JM, Sherman F. 1986. Altered 40 S ribosomal subunits in omnipotent suppressors of yeast. J Mol Biol 188:207–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(86)90305-0.
18. Ben-Shem A, Garreau de Loubresse N, Melnikov S, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. 2011. The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0 A resolution. Science 334:1524–1529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1212642.
19. Altmann M, Trachsel H. 1997. Translation initiation factor-dependent extracts from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 11:343–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.1996.0432.
20. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19–27.
21. Beckmann K, Grskovic M, Gebauer F, Hentze MW. 2005. A dual inhibitory mechanism restricts msl-2 mRNA translation for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Cell 122:529–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.011.
22. Miura F, Kawaguchi N, Sese J, Toyoda A, Hattori M, Morishita S, Ito T. 2006. A large-scale full-length cDNA analysis to explore the budding yeast transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA103:17846–17851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605645103.
23. Verge V, Vonlanthen M, Masson JM, Trachsel H, Altmann M. 2004. Localization of a promoter in the putative internal ribosome entry site of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TIF4631 gene. RNA 10:277–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.5910104.
24. Ahn SH, Keogh MC, Buratowski S. 2009. Ctk1 promotes dissociation of basal transcription factors from elongating RNA polymerase II. EMBO J 28:205–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.280.
25. Rother S. 2007. Functional analysis of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain kinase Ctk1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ph.D. thesis. Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
26. Bodenmiller B, Wanka S, Kraft C, Urban J, Campbell D, Pedrioli PG, Gerrits B, Picotti P, Lam H, Vitek O, Brusniak MY, Roschitzki B, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Schlapbach R, Colman-Lerner A, Nolan GP, Nesvizhskii AI, Peter M, Loewith R, von Mering C, Aebersold R. 2010. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals interconnected system-wide responses to perturbations of kinases and phosphatases in yeast. Sci Signal 3:rs4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001182.
27. Bartkowiak B, Liu P, Phatnani HP, Fuda NJ, Cooper JJ, Price DH, Adelman K, Lis JT, Greenleaf AL. 2010. CDK12 is a transcription elongation-associated CTD kinase, the metazoan ortholog of yeast Ctk1. Genes Dev 24:2303–2316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1968210.
28. Garriga J, Grana X. 2004. Cellular control of gene expression by T-type cyclin/CDK9 complexes. Gene 337:15–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2004.05.007.
29. Napolitano G, Licciardo P, Carbone R, Majello B, Lania L. 2002. CDK9 has the intrinsic property to shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm, and enhanced expression of cyclin T1 promotes its nuclear localization. J Cell Physiol 192:209–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10130.
30. Hinnebusch AG. 2005. Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:407–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833.
31. Mascarenhas C, Edwards-Ingram LC, Zeef L, Shenton D, Ashe MP, Grant CM. 2008. Gcn4 is required for the response to peroxide stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 19:2995–3007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1173.
32. Altmann M, Linder P. 2010. Power of yeast for analysis of eukaryotic translation initiation. J Biol Chem 285:31907–31912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R110.144196.