the sampled red list index for plants, phase ii: Ground-truthing specimen-based conservation assessments

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 370, Issue 1662, 2015, Pages 1-11

  Brummitt, Neil ^a   Bachman, Steven P ^b   Aletrari, Elina ^a,c   Chadburn, Helen ^b   Griffiths Lee, Janine ^b   Lutz, Maiko ^b   Moat, Justin ^b   Rivers, Malin C ^b,d   Syfert, Mindy M ^a,e   Nic Lughadha, Eimear M ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conservation assessments; Ground truthing; IUCN red list; Plants; Sampled red list index

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; EXTINCTION RISK; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; IDENTIFICATION KEY; PLANT COMMUNITY; POPULATION ECOLOGY; RED LIST; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

BIODIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORECASTING; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; PLANT; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEMOGRAPHY; FORECASTING; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; PLANTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84920943292     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0015     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Butchart SHM et al. 2010 Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164-1168. (doi:10.1126/science.1187512)
2. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Bennun LA, Shutes SM, Akcakaya HR, Baillie JEM, Stuart SN, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM. 2004 Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. PLoS Biol. 2, 2294-2304. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383)
3. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN, Akçakaya HR, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM. 2005 Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 255-268. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1583)
4. Butchart SHM et al. 2007 Improvements to the Red List Index. PLoS ONE 2, e140. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000140)
5. Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM. 2006 The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 71-76. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010)
6. Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Akçakaya HR, Leader-Williams N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Stuart SN. 2008 Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1424-1442. (doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x)
7. Stuart SN, Wilson EO, McNeely JA, Mittermeier RA, Rodriguez JP. 2010 The barometer of Life. Science 328, 117. (doi:10.1126/science.1188606)
8. Baillie JEM et al. 2008 Toward monitoring global biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 1, 18-26. (doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00009.x)
9. Brummitt NA, Bachman SP, Moat JF. 2008 Applications of the IUCN Red List: towards a global barometer for plant diversity. Endangered Species Res. 6, 127-135. (doi:10.3354/esr00135)
10. Brummitt, NA, Bachman, SP. 2010 Plantsunderpressure—aglobalassessment:thefirstreportoftheIUCNSampledRedListIndexforPlants.Kew,UK:RoyalBotanicGardens.
11. Brummitt NA et al. In press. Green plants in the red: a baseline global assessment for the Sampled Red List Index for Plants. PLoS ONE.
12. Nic Lughadha E et al. 2005 Measuring the fate of plant diversity: towards a foundation for future monitoring and opportunities for urgent action. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 359-372. (doi:10.1098?rstb.2004.1596)
13. IUCN. 2001 IUCNRedListCategories,version3.1. PreparedbytheIUCNSpeciesSurvivalCommission.Cambridge,UK:IUCN.
14. Willis F, Moat J, Paton A. 2003 Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodivers. Conserv. 12, 1537-1552. (doi:10.1023/A:1023679329093)
15. Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B. 2011 Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys 150, 117-126. (doi:10.3897/zookeys.150.2109)
16. Rivers MC, Bachman SP, Meagher TR, Nic Lughadha EM, Brummitt NA. 2010 Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN Red List criteria to herbarium specimen data. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 2071-2085. (doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9826-9)
17. Rivers MC, Taylor L, Brummitt NA, Meagher TR, Roberts DL, Nic Lughadha EM. 2011 How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biol. Conserv. 144, 2541-2547. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.014)
18. Syfert MM, Smith MJ, Coomes DA. 2013 The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS ONE 8, e55158. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055158)
19. IUCN. 2014 GuidelinesforusingtheIUCNRedListCategoriesandCriteria,version11.0. PreparedbytheStandardsandPetitionsWorkingGroupoftheIUCNSSCBiodiversityAssessmentsSub-Committee.
20. Syfert MM, Joppa L, Smith MJ, Coomes DA, Bachman SP, Brummitt NA. 2014 Using species distribution models to inform IUCN Red List assessments. Biol. Conserv. 177, 174-184. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.012)
21. Schipper J et al. 2008 The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322, 225-230. (doi:10.1126?science.1165115)
22. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW. 2004 Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783-1786. (doi:10.1126?science.1103538)
23. BirdLife International. 2013 State of the world‘s birds: indicators for our changing world. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.
24. Newton AC. 2011 Implications of Goodhart’s Law for monitoring global biodiversity loss. Conserv. Lett. 4, 264-268. (doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00167.x)
25. Hansen MC et al. 2013 High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850-853. (doi:10.1126/science.1244693)
26. Rivers MC, Brummitt NA, Nic Lughadha EM, Meagher TR. In press. Do species conservation assessments capture genetic diversity? Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2, 81-87. (doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2014.08.005)