Nature Advocacy and the Indigenous Symbol

Environmental Values

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 105-122

  Tanasescu, Mihnea ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Indigeneity; Nature rights; Political ecology

Indexed keywords

INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE; NATURE CONSERVATION; POLITICAL IDEOLOGY;

ECUADOR;

EID: 84920929185     PISSN: 09632719     EISSN: 17527015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3197/096327115X14183182353863     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acosta, A. 2008. La Naturaleza como Sujeta de Derechos. [online] Available at: http://www.ambiental.net/opinion/AcostaNaturalezaDerechos.htm [Accessed 24 June 2011].
2. Acosta, A. 2011. La Naturaleza con Derechos: Una Propuesta de Cambio Civilizatorio. [online] Available at: http://www.lai.at/attachments/article/89/Acosta-Naturaleza%20Derechos%202011.pdf [Accessed 20 Jan. 2013].
3. Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Refections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
4. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. 1998. Constitución Política de la República del Ecuador. [online] Available at: http://pdba.georgetown.edu/constitutions/Ecuador/ecuador98.html [Accessed 12 Jan. 2013].
5. Asamblea Constituyente. 2008a. Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [online] Available at: http://www.asambleanacional.gov.ec/documentos/Constitucion-2008.pdf [Accessed 1 Aug. 2012].
6. Asamblea Constituyente. 2008b. ACTA 058. Transcript Plenary Discussion of 6 June 2008. Quito: Biblioteca Nacional.
7. Beck, S.H. and K.J. Mijeski. 2000. ‘Indigena self-identity in Ecuador and the rejection of Mestizaje’. Latin American Research Review 35/1: 119-137.
8. Beck, S.H. and K.J. Mijeski. 2001. ‘Barricades and ballots: Ecuador's Indians and the Pachakutik political movement’. Ecuadorian Studies 1: 1-23.
9. Bertzky, M. et al. 2010. Carbon, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services: Exploring Co-Benefits Ecuador. Cambridge: United Nations Environmental Programme and World Conservation Monitoring Center.
10. Berry, T. 1999. The Great Work: Our Way Into the Future. New York: Crown Publishing.
11. Callicott, J.B. 2000. ‘The indigenous world or many indigenous worlds?’ Environmental Ethics 22/3: 291-310. CrossRef
12. Campbell, T. 2006. Rights: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
13. Carter Center, 2008. Informe Sobre la Asamblea Constituyente de la Republica del Ecuador. 5 Sept. 2008. Quito: Carter Center.
14. Center For Economic and Social Rights (CESR). 1994. Rights Violations in the Ecuadorian Amazon: The Human Consequences of Oil Development. New York: CESR.
15. Cullinan, C. 2011. Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice. 2nd edn. Devon: Green Books.
16. Daly, E. 2012. ‘The Ecuadorian exemplar: The first ever vindications of constitutional rights of nature’. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 21: 63-66. CrossRef
17. Donnelly, J. 1993. ‘Third generation rights’, in C. Brölmann et al. (eds) Peoples and Minorities in International Law. Geneva/The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
18. Fontaine, G. 2007. Entre Ecologismo Utópico y Nacionalismo Pragmático: El Proyecto Ishpingo, Tambococha y Tiputini (ITT) y la Gobernanza Energética en el Ecuador. Working Paper 1, Observatorio Socioambiental. Quito: FLACSO.
19. Gudynas, E. 2011a. ‘Desarollo, Derechos de la Naturaleza y Buen Vivir Despues de Montecristi’, in G. Weber (ed.) Debates Sobre Cooperación y Modelos de Desarollo. Perspectivas desde la Sociedad Civil en el Ecuador. Quito: Centro de Investigaciones CIUDAD.
20. Gudynas, E. 2011b. ‘Los Derechos de la Naturaleza en Serio. Respuestas y Aportes desde la Ecología Política’, in A. Acosta and E. Martinez (eds) La Naturaleza con Derechos. De la Filosofía a la Política. Quito: AbyaYala.
21. Heckenberger, M.J. et al. 2003. ‘Amazonia 1492: Pristine forest or cultural parkland?’ Science 301: 1710-1714. CrossRef
22. Heckenberger, M.J. et al. 2008. ‘Pre-Columbian urbanism, anthropogenic landscapes, and the future of the Amazon’. Science 321: 1241-1217. CrossRef
23. Hobsbawm, E. and T.O. Ranger (eds). 1992. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lovelock, J. 1979. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Mann, C.C. 2005. 1491: The Americas Before Columbus. London: Granta Books.
26. Morgan-Foster, J. 2005. ‘Third generation rights: What Islamic Law can teach the international human rights movement’. Yale Human Rights and Development L.J. [online] Available at: http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/LawJournals/morgan-foster.pdf [Accessed 14 Jan. 2013].
27. Mosandl, R. et al. 2008. ‘Ecuador suffers the highest deforestation rate in South America’, in E. Beck et al. (eds.) Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador, Ecological Studies 198. CrossRef
28. Saward, M. 2003. The Representative Claim. Paper prepared for the workshop on Political Representation, ECPR Joint Sessions, Edinburgh.
29. Saward, M. 2006a. ‘Representation’, in A. Dobson and R. Eckersley (eds) Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 183-199.
30. Saward, M. 2006b. ‘The representative claim’. Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297-318. CrossRef
31. Southgate, D., R. Wasserstrom and S. Reider. 2009. Oil development, deforestation, and indigenous populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
32. Stone, C.D. 1972. ‘Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects’. Southern California Law Review 45: 450.
33. Tanasescu, M. 2013. ‘The rights of nature in Ecuador: The making of an idea’. International Journal of Environmental Studies 70/6: 846-861. CrossRef
34. Tanasescu, M. 2014. ‘Rethinking representation: the challenge of non-humans’. Australian Journal of Political Science 49/1. CrossRef
35. Uquillas, J. 1984. ‘Colonization and spontaneous settlement in the Ecuadorian Amazon’, in M. Schmink and C.H. Wood (eds) Frontier Expansion in Amazonia. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
36. Vasak, K. 1984. ‘Pour une troisième generation des droits de l'homme’, in C. Swinarski (ed.) Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles. International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva/The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
37. Viteri Gualinga, C. 2000. Visión Indígena del Desarrollo en la Amazonía. Quito: [informal circulation].
38. Viteri Gualinga, C. 2002. Visión Indígena del Desarrollo en la Amazonía. Polis 1/3: 1-6.
39. Viteri Gualinga, C. 2004. ‘Gender and development projects in indigenous communities’, in S.H. Davis, J.E. Uquillas and M.A. Eltz (eds) Lessons of Indigenous Development in Latin America. The Proceedings of a World Bank Workshop on Indigenous Peoples Development. The World Bank Sustainable Development Working Paper no. 20, pp. 91-93.
40. Weisman, A. 2008. The World Without Us. London: Random House.
41. Zamosc, L. 2007. ‘The Indian Movement and political democracy in Ecuador’. Latin American Politics and Society 49/3: 1-34. CrossRef