A critical empirical case study of consumer surveillance on web 2.0

Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 145-169

  Sandoval, Marisol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920917380     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203806432     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Allen, Matthew. 2008. Web 2.0: An argument against convergence. FirstMon-day 13 (3) http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2139/1946 (accessed June 20, 2010).
2. Andrejevic, Mark. 2002. The work of being watched: Interactive Media and the explotation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication 19 (2): 230-248.
3. Ball, Kirstie. 2006. Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. In Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond, ed. David Lyon, 296-317. Portland, OR: Willan.
4. Ball, Kirstie and Frank Webster. 2003. The intensification of surveillance. In The intensification of surveillance, ed. Kirstie Ball and Frank Webster, 1-16. London: Pluto.
5. Beer, David and Roger Burrows. 2007. Sociology and, of and in web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online 12 (5). Http://www.socreson-line.org.uk/12/5/17.html (accessed June 20, 2010).
6. Bogard, William. 2006. Welcome to the society of control. In Surveillance and visibility, ed. Kevin Haggerty and Richard Ericson, 4-25. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7. Bogolicos, Nico. 2007. The perception of economic risks arising from the potential vulnerability of electronic commercial media to interception. In Handbook of technology management in public administration, ed. David Greisler and Stu-pak, 583-600. Boca Raton: CRC.
8. Boyd, Dannah. 2007. The significance of social software. In BlogTalks reloaded: Social software research & cases, ed. Thomas Burg and Jan Schmidt, 15-13. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
9. Bruns, Axel. 2007. Produsage, generation C, and their effects on the democratic process. Media in Transition 5. Http://eprints.qut.edu.au/7521/(accessed September 14, 2009).
10. Campbell, Edward John and Matt Carlson. 2002. Panopticon.com: Online surveillance and the commodification of privacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46 (4): 586-606.
11. Charters, Darren. 2002. Electronic monitoring and privacy issues in business-marketing: The ethics of the DoubleClick experience. Journal of Business Ethics 35: 243-254.
12. Clarke, Roger. 1988. Information technology and dataveillance. Communications of the ACM 31 (5): 498-512.
13. Coates, Tom. 2005. An addendum to a definition of social software. Http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/01/an_addendum_to_a_definition_of_social_software/(accessed September 14, 2009).
14. Cormode, Graham and Balachander Krishnamurthy. 2008. Key differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday 13 (3). Http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972 (accessed September 14, 2009).
15. Fernback, Jan and Zizi Papacharissi. 2007. Online privacy as legal safeguard: The relationship among consumer, online portal, and privacy policies. New Media and Society 9 (5): 715-734.
16. Foucault, Michelle. 1977/2007. Panopticism. In The surveillance studies reader, ed. Sean P. Hier and Josh Greenberg, 67-76. Berkshire: Open University Press.
17. Fuchs, Christian. 2008. Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge.
18. Fuchs, Christian. 2009a. Social networking sites and the surveillance society. Salzburg/Vienna: Unified Theory of Information Research Group.
19. Fuchs, Christian. 2009b. A contribution to the critique of the political economy of the Internet. European Journal of Communication 24 (1): 69-87.
20. Fuchs, Christian. 2010. Labor in informational capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society 26 (3): 179-196.
21. Gandy, Oscar. 1993. The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal informa-tion. Boulder: Westview.
22. Haggerty, Kevin and David Lyon. 2006. Tear down the walls. In Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond, 23-45. Portland, OR: Willan.
23. Harrison, Teresa M. And Brea Barthel. 2009. Wielding new media in web 2.0: Exploring the history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media & Society 11 (1): 155-178.
24. Hier, Sean P. And Josh Greenberg. 2007. Glossary of terms. In The surveillance studies reader, ed. Sean Hier and Josh Greenberg, 378-381. Berkshire: Open University Press.
25. Jarrett, Kylie. 2008. Interactivity is evil: A critical investigation of Web 2.0. First Monday 13 (3). Http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2140/1947 (accessed September 14, 2009).
26. Kortzfleisch, Harald, Ines Mergel, Shakib Manouchehri, and Mario Schaarschmidt. 2008. Corporate web 2.0 applications. In Web 2.0, ed. Berthold Hass, Gianfranco Walsh, and Thomas Kilian, 73-87. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
27. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28. Lyon, David. 2003. Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies. In Surveillance as social sorting, ed. David Lyon, 13-30. London: Routledge.
29. Lyon, David. 2007. Everyday surveillance: Personal data and social classifications. In The surveillance studies reader, ed. Sean P. Hier and Josh Greenberg, 136-146. Berkshire: Open University Press.
30. Mathiesen, Thomas. 1997. The viewer society: Michel Foucault's panopticon revisited. Theoretical Criminology 1: 215-237.
31. Ogura, Toshimaru. 2006. Electronic government and surveillance-oriented society. In Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond, ed. David Lyon, 270-295. Portland, OR: Willan.
32. O'reilly, Tim. 2005. What is web 2.0?: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20. html (accessed September 14, 2009).
33. Papacharissi, Zizi and Jan Fernback. 2005. Online privacy and consumer protection: An analysis of portal privacy statements 49 (3): 259-281.
34. Petersen, Soren Mark. 2008. Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation. First Monday 13 (3). Http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index. php/fm/article/view/2141/1948 (accessed September 14, 2009).
35. Reis, Leslie Ann. 2007. Personally identifiable information. In Encyclopedia of privacy, ed. William G. Staples, 383-385. Westport/London: Greenwood.
36. Rule, James B. 1973/2007. Social control and modern social structure. In The surveillance studies reader, ed. Sean P. Hier and Josh Greenberg, 19-27. Berkshire: Open University Press.
37. Scholz, Trebor. 2008. Market ideology and the myths of Web 2.0. First Monday 13 (3). Http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945 (accessed September 14, 2009).
38. Smythe, Dallas. 1981/2006. On the audience commodity and its work. In Media and cultural studies, ed. Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas Kellner. Malden: Blackwell.
39. Solove, Daniel. 2004. The digital person: Technology and privacy in the informa-tion age. New York: New York University Press.
40. Starke-Meyerring, Doreen and Laura Gurak. 2007. Internet. In Encyclopedia of privacy, ed. William G. Staples, 297-310. Westport/London: Greenwood.
41. The Astonishing Tribe. 2010. Recognizr covered by FOX News and SC Magazine. Press Release. May 3, 2010. Http://www.tat.se/site/media/news_1. php?newsItem=42 (accessed June 20, 2010).
42. Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The third wave. New York: Bantam.
43. Turow, Joseph. 2006. Cracking the consumer code: Advertisers, anxiety, and surveillance in the digital age. In The new politics of surveillance and visibility, ed. Kevin Haggerty and Richard Ericson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Van Dicjk, Jose. 2009. Users like you? theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society 31 (1): 41-58.
44. Wall, David. 2006. Surveillant internet technologies and the growth in information in information capitalism: Spams and public trust in the information society. In The new politics of surveillance and visibility, ed. Kevin Haggerty and Richard Ericson, 240-261. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.