Radiometric and geometric evaluation of GeoEye-1, WorldView-2 and Pléiades-1A stereo images for 3D information extraction

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 100, Issue , 2015, Pages 35-47

  Poli, D ^a   Remondino, F ^b   Angiuli, E ^c   Agugiaro, G ^b  

^a Terra Messflug GmbH   (Austria)

^b FONDAZIONE BRUNO KESSLER   (Italy)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

DSM; Geometry; Quality assessment; Quantitative analysis; Radiometry; Very high resolution

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DATA FUSION; DATA MINING; FEATURE EXTRACTION; GEOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; OPTICAL RADAR; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOMETRY; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

3D INFORMATION EXTRACTIONS; DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS; DSM; GEOMETRIC ACCURACY; MULTI-SPECTRAL; OPTICAL METROLOGY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; VERY HIGH RESOLUTION;

STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

DATA ACQUISITION; GEOEYE; LIDAR; PLEIADES; RADIOMETRIC SURVEY; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STEREO IMAGE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WORLDVIEW;

ITALY; TRENTINO-ALTO ADIGE; TRENTO;

EID: 84920888521     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 4DiXplorer AG website, 2013. (access 02.14). http://www.4dixplorer.com.
2. Agugiaro G., Poli D., Remondino F. Testfield trento: geometric evaluation of very high resolution satellite imagery. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2012, 39(1):191-196.
3. Aguilar M.A., Saldana M.d.M., Aguilar F.J. Generation and quality assessment of stereo-extracted DSM from GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2 imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 52(6):11259-11271.
4. Astrium, 2012. Pléiades Imagery User Guide. October 2012-v2.0.
5. Brec, 2014. BREC - Building Reconstruction, (access 04.14). http://www.virtualcitysystems.de.
6. Cheng Ph., Chaapel C. Using WorldView-1 stereo data with or without ground control points. GEOinformatics 2008, 11(7):34-39.
7. Choi, T., 2002. IKONOS satellite on orbit modulation transfer function (MTF) measurement using edge and pulse method. Master Thesis. South Dakota State University: Brookings, SD, USA.
8. Crespi M., De Vendictis L. A procedure for high resolution satellite imagery quality assessment. Sensors 2009, 9:3289-3313.
9. DAngelo P., Reinartz P. Semi-global matching results on the ISPRS stereo matching benchmark. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2011, 38(4/W19):79-84.
10. Deilami K., Hashim M. Very high resolution optical satellites for DEM generation: a review. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2011, 49(4):542-554.
11. DigitalGlobe website, 2012. (access 02.14). http://www.digitalglobe.com.
12. Flamanc D., Maillet G. Evaluation of 3D city model production from Pléiades-HR images and 2D ground maps. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2005, 36(8/W27). on CDROM.
13. Gleyzes M.A., Perret L., Philippe Kubik P. Pléiades system architecture and main performances. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2012, 39(1):537-542.
14. Helder, D., Choi, J., 2003. On-orbit Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) measurements on QuickBird. In: Proceedings of the 2003 High Spatial Resolution Commercial Imagery Workshop, NASA/NIMA/USGS Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation Team: Reston, VA, USA.
15. Hobi M.L., Ginzler C. Accuracy assessment of digital surface models based on WorldView-2 and ADS80 stereo remote sensing data. Sensors 2012, 12(5):6347-6368.
16. Jacobsen K. Characteristics of very high resolution optical satellites for topographic mapping. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2011, 38(4/W19). on CDROM.
17. Kohm K. Modulation transfer function measurement method and results for the OrbView-3 high resolution imaging satellite. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2004, 35(B1):7-12.
18. Leger D., Viallefont F., Deliot P., Valorge C. On-orbit MTF assessment of satellite cameras. Post-Launch Calibration of Satellite Sensors 2004, 67-76. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK. S.A. Morain, A.M. Budge (Eds.).
19. Macay Moreia J.M., Nex F., Agugiaro G., Remondino F., Lim N.J. From DSM to 3D building models: a quantitative evaluation. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2013, 40(1/W1):213-219.
20. Pateraki, M., 2005. Adaptive Multi-Image Matching for DSM Generation from Airborne Linear Array CCD Data. Ph. D. Dissertation, No 86, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
21. Poli D., Wolff K., Gruen A. Evaluation of Worldview-1 stereo scenes and related 3D products. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2009, 38(1-4-7/W5). on CDROM.
22. Poli D., Caravaggi I. 3D modeling of large urban areas with stereo VHR satellite imagery: lessons learned. Nat. Hazards 2013, 68(1):53-78.
23. Poli D., Remondino F., Angiuli E., Agugiaro G. Evaluation of Pléiades-1A triplet on Trento testfield. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2013, 40(1/W1):287-292.
24. Poli D., Toutin T. Review of developments in geometric modelling for high resolution satellite pushbroom sensors. The Photogrammetric Record 2012, 27(137):58-73.
25. sarmap website, 2013. (access 02.14). http://www.sarmap.ch.
26. Sirmacek B., Taubenboeck H., Reinartz P., Ehlers M. Performance evaluation of 3-D City models based on six different DSMs from airborne and space-borne sensors. IEEE J. Selected Topics Appl. Earth Observat. Remote Sens., Optical Multi-Angular Data Special Issue 2012, 1(5):59-70.
27. Zhang, 2005. Automatic Digital Surface Model (DSM) generation from linear array images. Diss. ETH No. 16078, Technische Wissenschaften ETH Zurich, 2005, IGP Mitteilung N. 90.