Choice and luck in recent egalitarian thought

Philosophical Papers

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 145-167

  Hinton, Timothy ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920876344     PISSN: 05568641     EISSN: 19968523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/05568640209485099     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. G. A. Cohen, ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics 99 (1989), p. 933.
2. G. A. Cohen, ‘Must Egalitarians Choose between Fairness and Respect?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Spring 2001 (30) 1.
3. Ronald Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue: The 'Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press (2000).
4. Richard Arneson, ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’, Philosophical Studies, 56 (1989).
5. Amartya Sen, Inequality Reexamined Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, (1992) among others.
6. Terence Price, ‘Egalitarian Justice, and the Costs of Chosen Ends’, American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1999), p. 272.
7. Nozick Anarchy, Shite and Utopia, Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1974), p. 206.
8. Richard Ameson, ‘Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(2) (1990) pp. 180-183.
9. Elizabeth Anderson, ‘What is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics 109 (1999).
10. Jonathan Wolff, ‘Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27(2) (1998).