Comparative study of element mercury removal by three bio-chars from various solid wastes

Fuel

Volumn 145, Issue , 2015, Pages 189-195

  Li, Guoliang ^a,b   Shen, Boxiong ^a,b   Wang, Yi ^a   Yue, Shiji ^a   Xi, Yinqiao ^a   An, Minde ^a   Ren, Kaikuo ^b  

^a HEBEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bio chars; Cost effective; Element mercury; Mechanism of mercury removal; Solid wastes pyrolysis

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; AGRICULTURAL WASTES; AGRICULTURE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMISORPTION; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PHYSISORPTION; POLYACRYLONITRILES; SOLID WASTES; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; WASTES; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ADSORPTION CAPACITIES; BIO CHARS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COST EFFECTIVE; MERCURY REMOVAL; MODIFIED ACTIVATED CARBONS; PHYSICAL MODIFICATIONS; REMOVAL CAPACITY;

MERCURY (METAL);

EID: 84920860991     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.083     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J.H. Pavlish, M.J. Holmes, S.A. Benson, C.R. Crocker, and K.C. Galbreath Application of sorbents for mercury control for utilities burning lignite coal Fuel Process Technol 85 2004 563 576
2. A.A. Presto, E.J. Granite, and A. Karash Further investigation of the impact of sulfur oxides on mercury capture by activated carbon Indust Eng Chem Res 46 2007 8273 8276
3. H. Zeng, F. Jin, and J. Guo Removal of elemental mercury from coal combustion flue gas by chloride-impregnated activated carbon Fuel 83 2004 143 146
4. S. Lee Removal of gas-phase elemental mercury by iodine- and chlorine-impregnated activated carbons Atmos Environ 38 2004 4887 4893
5. I.H. Hwang, T. Matsuto, N. Tanaka, Y. Sasaki, and K. Tanaami Characterization of char derived from various types of solid wastes from the standpoint of fuel recovery and pretreatment before landfilling Waste Manage 27 2007 1155 1166
6. N. Hutson Mercury capture on fly ash and sorbents: the effects of coal properties and combustion conditions Water Air Soil Pollut: Focus 8 2008 323 331
7. L. Xing, Y. Xu, and Q. Zhong Mn and Fe modified fly ash as a superior catalyst for elemental mercury capture under air conditions Energy Fuels 26 2012 4903 4909
8. T. Shu, P. Lu, and N. He Mercury adsorption of modified mulberry twig chars in a simulated flue gas Bioresour Technol 136 2013 182 187
9. W.J. Liu, F.X. Zeng, H. Jiang, and X.S. Zhang Preparation of high adsorption capacity bio-chars from waste biomass Bioresour Technol 102 2011 8247 8252
10. K.T. Klasson, L.L. Boihem, M. Uchimiya, and I.M. Lima Influence of biochar pyrolysis temperature and post-treatment on the uptake of mercury from flue gas Fuel Process Technol 123 2014 27 33
11. M.M. Maroto-Valer, Y. Zhang, E.J. Granite, Z. Tang, and H.W. Pennline Effect of porous structure and surface functionality on the mercury capacity of a fly ash carbon and its activated sample Fuel 84 2005 105 108
12. K.T. Klasson, I.M. Lima, L.L. Boihem, and L.H. Wartelle Feasibility of mercury removal from simulated flue gas by activated chars made from poultry manures J Environ Manage 91 2010 2466 2470
13. Z. Tan, L. Sun, J. Xiang, H. Zeng, Z. Liu, and S. Hu Gas-phase elemental mercury removal by novel carbon-based sorbents Carbon 50 2012 362 371
14. H.-C. Hsi, C.-Y. Tsai, T.-H. Kuo, and C.-S. Chiang Development of low-concentration mercury adsorbents from biohydrogen-generation agricultural residues using sulfur impregnation Bioresour Technol 102 2011 7470 7477
15. M. De, R. Azargohar, A.K. Dalai, and S.R. Shewchuk Mercury removal by bio-char based modified activated carbons Fuel 103 2013 570 578
16. 2 activation of pyrolysis char Fuel Process Technol 123 2014 57 64
17. Y.H. Li, C.W. Lee, and B.K. Gullett Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption↠Fuel 82 2003 451 457
18. G. Skodras, I. Diamantopoulou, A. Zabaniotou, G. Stavropoulos, and G.P. Sakellaropoulos Enhanced mercury adsorption in activated carbons from biomass materials and waste tires Fuel Process Technol 88 2007 749 758
19. H.-C. Hsi, M.J. Rood, M. Rostam-Abadi, S. Chen, and R. Chang Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers ACFs Environ Sci Technol 35 2001 2785 2791
20. 2.pdf>; 2007.
21. C. Bouchelta, M.S. Medjram, O. Bertrand, and J.-P. Bellat Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation with steam J Anal Appl Pyrol 82 2008 70 77
22. A.F. Pérez-Cadenas, F.J. Maldonado-Hódar, and C. Moreno-Castilla On the nature of surface acid sites of chlorinated activated carbons Carbon 41 2003 473 478
23. 3/SiO films deposited by co-evaporation J Mater Sci 25 1990 1784 1788
24. P. Behra, P. Bonnissel-Gissinger, M. Alnot, R. Revel, and J.J. Ehrhardt XPS and XAS study of the sorption of Hg(II) onto pyrite Langmuir 17 2001 3970 3979
25. N.D. Hutson, B.C. Attwood, and K.G. Scheckel XAS and XPS characterization of mercury binding on brominated activated carbon Environ Sci Technol 41 2007 1747 1752
26. H.-C. Hsi, and C.-T. Chen Influences of acidic/oxidizing gases on elemental mercury adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of sulfur-impregnated activated carbon Fuel 98 2012 229 235
27. G. Skodras, I. Diamantopoulou, G. Pantoleontos, and G.P. Sakellaropoulos Kinetic studies of elemental mercury adsorption in activated carbon fixed bed reactor J Hazard Mater 158 2008 1 13
28. Y.S. Ho, and G. McKay A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents Process Safety Environ Protect 76 1998 332 340
29. S.J. Miller, G.E. Dunham, E.S. Olson, and T.D. Brown Flue gas effects on a carbon-based mercury sorbent Fuel Process Technol 65-66 2000 343 363
30. 2 sorption on lignite activated carbon: analysis of fixed-bed results Fuel Process Technol 90 2009 1364 1371
31. I. Diamantopoulou, G. Skodras, and G.P. Sakellaropoulos Sorption of mercury by activated carbon in the presence of flue gas components Fuel Process Technol 91 2010 158 163
32. A. Saha, D.N. Abram, K.P. Kuhl, J. Paradis, J.L. Crawford, and E. Sasmaz An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of surface changes on brominated and sulfur-treated activated carbon sorbents during mercury capture: performance of pellet versus fiber sorbents Environ Sci Technol 47 2013 13695 13701