Mechanical and dynamic characteristics of encapsulated microbubbles coupled by magnetic nanoparticles as multifunctional imaging and drug delivery agents

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 59, Issue 22, 2014, Pages 6729-6747

  Guo, Gepu ^a   Lu, Lu ^a   Yin, Leilei ^b   Tu, Juan ^a   Guo, Xiasheng ^a   Wu, Junru ^c   Xu, Di ^d   Zhang, Dong ^a,e  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c University of Vermont ^*  (United States)

^d THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

atomic force microscopy; gene drug delivery; inertial cavitation; magnetic nanoparticles; multifunctional contrast agent microbubbles; ultrasound imaging

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CAVITATION; DIAGNOSIS; DYNAMICS; GENES; MAGNETISM; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

GENE/DRUG DELIVERIES; INERTIAL CAVITATION; MAGNETIC NANO-PARTICLES; MICROBUBBLES; ULTRASOUND IMAGING;

NANOMAGNETICS;

ALBUMINOID; CONTRAST MEDIUM; FERRIC ION; FERRIC OXIDE; FLUOROCARBON; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; VASCULOTROPIN A;

ACOUSTICS; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METABOLISM; MICROBUBBLE; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTICS; ALBUMINS; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; FLUOROCARBONS; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MICROBUBBLES; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; ULTRASONICS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A;

EID: 84920848738     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/6729     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbasi A Z et al 2011 Magnetic capsules for NMR imaging and drug delivery: effect of magnetic nanoparticles spatial distribution and aggregation J. Phys. Chem. 115 6257-64
2. Al-Bataineh O, Jenne J and Huber P 2012 Clinical and future applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in cancer Cancer Treat. Rev. 38 346-53
3. Baker M 2010 Whole-animal imaging: the whole picture Nature 463 977-80
4. Berret J F, Schonbeck N, Gazeau F, EI Kharrat D, Sandre O, Vacher A and Airiau M 2006 Controlled clustering of superparamagnetic nanoparticles using block copolymers: design of new contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 1755-61
5. Borden M A, Kruse D E, Caskey C F, Zhao S K, Dayton P A and Ferrara K W 2005 Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 52 1992-2002
6. Chen C C, Wu S Y, Finan J D, Morrison B III and Konofagou E E 2013 An experimental study on the stiffness of size-isolated microbubbles using atomic force microscopy IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 60 524-34
7. Chomas J E, Dayton P A, May D, Allen J, Klibanov A and Ferrara K 2000 Optical observation of contrast agent destruction Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 1056-8
8. Chow A M, Chan K W Y, Cheung J S and Wu E X 2010 Enhancement of gas-filled microbubble R2∗ by iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 63 224-9
9. Church C C 1995 The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1510-21
10. Cosgrove D 2006 Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview Eur. J. Radiol. 60 324-30
11. Czamota GJ et al 2012 Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 E2033-41
12. Deshpande M C and Prausnitz M R 2007 Synergistic effects of ultrasound and PEI on DNA transfection in vitro J. Control. Release 118 126-35
13. Fischer D, Bieber T, Li Y, Elsasser H P and Kissel T 1999 A novel non-viral vector for DNA delivery based on low molecular weight, branched polyethylenimine: effect of molecular weight on transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity Pharm. Res 16 1273-9
14. Frauscher F, Klauser A, Halpem EJ, Hominger W and Bartsch G 2001 Detection of prostate cancer with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent Lancet 357 1849-50
15. Gupta A K and Gupta M 2005 Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications Biomaterials 26 3995-21
16. Hoff L, Sontum P C and Hovem J M 2000 Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 2272-80
17. Ianos R, Taculescu A, Pacurariu C and Lazau I 2012 Solution combustion synthesis and characterization of magnetite, Fe3O4, nanopowders J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 2236-40
18. Indira T K and Lakshmi P K 2010 Magnetic nanoparticles-a review Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Nanotechnol. 3 1035-42
19. Jin Y D, Jia C X, Huang S W, O'Donnell M and Gao X H 2010 Multifunctional nanoparticles as coupled contrast agents Nat. Commun. 1 41
20. Kennedy J E 2005 High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours Nature 5 321-7
21. Kim B H et al 2011 Large-scale synthesis of uniform and extremely small- sized iron oxide nanoparticles for high-resolution T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 12624-31
22. Kwan J J and Borden M A 2010 Microbubble dissolution in a multigas environment Langmuir 26 6542-8
23. Miller D L, Pislaru S V and Greenleaf J F 2002 Sonoporation: mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation Cell Mol. Genet. 27 115-34
24. Mitragotri S 2005 Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 4 255-60
25. Niu CC et al 2013 Doxorubicin loaded superparamagnetic PLGA-iron oxide multifunctional microbubbles for dual-mode US/MR imaging and therapy of metastasis in lymph nodes Biomaterials 34 2307-17
26. Park J I, Jagadeesan D, Williams R, Oakden W, Chung S, Stanisz G and Kumacheva E 2010 Microbubbles loaded with nanoparticles: a route to multiple imaging modalities ACS Nano 4 6579-86
27. Poehlmann M et al 2014 On the interplay of shell structure with low- and high-frequency mechanics of multifunctional magnetic microbubbles Soft Matter 10 214-26
28. Porter T R, Xie F, Kricsfeld A and Kilzer K 1995 Nonlinear identification of acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion with contrast ultrasound using intravenous perfluoropropane-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin J. Am. College Cardiol. 26 33-40
29. Postema M and Schmitz G 2006 Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 6 493-502
30. Qiu Y, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Cui W, Zhang D, Wu J and Zhang J 2010 The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with Polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro J. Control. Release 145 40-8
31. Raisinghani A and DesMaria A N 2002 Physical principles of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents Am. J. Cardiol. 90 3J-7J
32. Sailor M J and Park J H 2012 Hybrid nanoparticles for detection and treatment of cancer Adv. Mater. 24 3779-802
33. Sandhu A, Handa H and Abe M 2010 Synthesis and applications of magnetic nanoparticles for biorecognition and point of care medical diagnostics Nanotechnology 21 442001
34. Sboros V, Glynos E, Pye S D, Moran C M, Butler M, Ross J, Short R, McDicken W N and Koutsos V 2006 Nanointerrogation of ultrasonic contrast agent microbubbles using atomic force microscopy Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 579-85
35. Soetanto K and Watarai H 2000 Development of magnetic microbubbles for drug delivery system (DDS) Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 39 3230-2
36. Tromsdorf U I, Bruns O T, Salmen S C, Beisiegel U and Weller H 2009 A highly effective nontoxic T1 MR contrast agent based on ultrasmall PE gylated iron oxide nanoparticles Nano Lett. 9 4434-40
37. Tu J, Matula T J, Brayman A A and Crum L A 2006 Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries by 1 MHz insonation treatment during infusion with optison Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32 281-88
38. Tu J, Guan J, Qiu Y and Matula T J 2009 Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue® microbubbles using light scattering J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126 2954-62
39. Tung Y S, Vlachos F, Feshitan J A, Borden M A and Konofagou E E 2011 The mechanism of interaction between focused ultrasound and microbubbles in blood-brain barrier opening in mice J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130 3059-67
40. Van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate F J, Versluis M and de Jong N 2006 Vibrating microbubbles poling individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation J. Control Release 112 149-55
41. Vinogradova O I 2004 Mechanical properties of polyelectrolyte multilayer microcapsules J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 16 R1105-34
42. Wrenn S P, Mleczko M and Schemitz G 2009 Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles Appl. Acoust. 70 1313-22
43. Wu J R and Nyborg W L 2008 Ultrasound, cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60 1103-16
44. Xu Q, Nakajima M, Ichikawa S, Nakamura N, Roy P, Okadome H and Shiina T 2009 Effects of surfactant and electrolyte concentrations on bubble formation and stabilization J. Colloid Interface Sci. 332 208-14
45. Yang s, Li L, Li Y, Chen Z, Wu J and Gu N 2008 Superparamagnetic nanoparticle-inclusion microbubbles for ultrasound contrast agents Phys. Med. Biol. 53 6129-41
46. Yang F, Li Y, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Wu J and Gu N 2009 Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging Biomaterials 30 3882-90
47. Zhang C B, Cao H L, Li Q, Tu J, Guo X and Liu Z 2013 Enhancement effect of ultrasound-induced microbubble cavitation on branched polyethylenimine-mediated VEGF(165) transfection with varied N/P ratio Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39 1s61-71