‘Tough on probation’: Probation practice under the national offender management service

Community Justice: Issues for Probation and Criminal Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 91-105

  Gough, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920834396     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843925781     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Bottoms, A. (2004) ‘Empirical Research Relevant to Sentencing Frameworks’, in A. Bottoms, S. Rex and G. Robinson (eds), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society. Cullompton: Willan.
2. Cann, T., Falshaw, L., Nugent, F. And Friendship, C. (2003) ‘Understanding What Works: accredited cognitive skills programmes by adult men and young offenders.’ Home Office Research Findings 226.
3. Carter, P. (2003) Managing Offenders, Changing Lives: A New Approach. Report of the Correctional Services Review. London: Strategy Unit.
4. Cowan R. (2004) ‘Welcome to the Prison without Bars’, Guardian, 3 September.
5. Coyle, A. (2004) ‘Lessons from Abroad’, in Safer Society, 21, Summer. NACRO.
6. Dobson, G. (2004) ‘Get Carter’, Probation Journal, 51 (2): 144-154.
7. Duff, R.A. (2003) ‘Probation, Punishment and Restorative Justice: Should Altrusim Be Engaged in Punishment?’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42 (2): 181-197.
8. Ellis, T. (2000) ‘Enforcement Policy and Practice: Evidence-Based or Rhetoric Based’, Criminal Justice Matters. 39, Spring: 6-8.
9. Ellis, T., and Wins tone, J. (2002) ‘The Policy Impact of a Survey of Programme Evaluations in England and Wales: Towards a New Corrections - Industrial Complex?’ in J. McGuire (ed.) Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment. Chichester: Wiley.
10. Garland, D. (1996) ‘Probation and the Reconfiguration of Crime Control’, in R. Burnett (ed.), The Probation Service: Responding to Change, Proceeds of the Probation Studies Unit, First Colloquium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Garside, R. (2004) ‘Who Delivers and Why it Matters’, Safer Society, 21. NACRO.
12. Hearndon, C. And Millie, A. (2004) ‘Does Tougher Enforcement Lead to Lower Reconviction?’, Probation Journal, 51 (1): 48-58.
13. Hedderman, C., Ellis, T. And Sugg, D. (1999) Increasing Confidence in Community Sentences: The Results of Two Demonstration Projects, Home Office Research Study 194. London: Home Office.
14. Hedderman, C. And Hough, M. (2004) ‘Getting Tough or Being Effective: What Matters?’, in G. Mair (ed.), What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan.
15. Hedderman, C. And Hough, M. (2000) ‘Getting Tough or Being Effective: What Matters?’, in G. Mair (2004) What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
16. Hedderman, C. And Hough, M. (2000) ‘Tightening Up Probation: A Step Too Far?’, Criminal Justice Matters, 39, Spring: 5.
17. HMCIC (Her Majesty Chief Inspector of Constabulary et al) (2005) Joint Inspection report into Persistent and Prolific Offenders. HMI.
18. Home Office (1998) Prisons-Probation Review Final Report, Chapters 2 and 3. downloaded from http://www.homeoffice.gov.ukldocs/ppr2.html, 15 January 2005.
19. Home Office (2000) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London: Home Office.
20. Home Office (2001) Making Punishments Work. Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales. (Halliday Report) London: Home Office.
21. Home Office (2004) Reducing Crime, Changing Lives. London: Home Office.
22. Mair, G., Sibbit, R. And Crisp, D. (1994) The Combination Order - An interim report. Home Office Research and Planning Unit (unpublished).
23. May, C. And Wadwell, J. (2001) Enforcing Community Penalties: The Relationship Between Enforcement and Reconviction. Home Office Research Study 155. London: Home Office.
24. McGuire, J. (2002) ‘Integrating Findings from Research Reviews’, in J. McGuire (ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment. Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Reoffending. Chichester: Wiley.
25. McNeill, F. (2004) ‘Supporting Desistance in Probation Practice: A Reply to Maruna, Porter and Carlvalho’, Probation Journal, 51 (3): 241-247.
26. Nellis, M. (1999) ‘Towards "The field of Corrections": Modernizing the Probation Service in the Late 1990’s’, Social Policy and Administration, 33 (3) September: 302- 323.
27. Roberts, J. And Smith, M.E. (2004) ‘Custody Plus, Custody Minus’ in M. Tonry (ed.) Confronting Crime: crime control policy under New Labour. Cullompton: Willan.
28. Roberts, S. (2004), Government Strategy: Increasing Community Safety or Courting the Decent Majority in Criminal Justice Matters, No. 57 Autumn: p12-14.
29. Underdown, A. (2001) ‘Making "What Works" work: Challenges in the delivery of Community Penalties’ in A. E. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds) Community Penalities: change and challenges. Cullompton: Willan.
30. von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E. And Wikstrom, P. O. (1999) Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity: An Analysis of Recent Research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.