No one has yet properly articulated what we are trying to achieve: A discourse analysis of interviews with revalidation policy leaders in the United Kingdom

Academic Medicine

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 88-93

  Archer, Julian ^a   Regan De Bere, Sam ^a   Nunn, Suzanne ^a   Clark, Jonathan ^a   Corrigan, Oonagh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; POLICY; STANDARDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84920819352     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000464     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brennan TA. Recertification for internists- one grandfathers experience. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1989-1992.
2. Medical Board of Australia. Registration. 2013. http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/News/Newsletters/November-2013.aspx. Accessed June 26, 2014.
3. Ward B. Revalidation in Canada 2010. Paper presented at: International Revalidation Symposium: Contributing to the Evidence Base; December 2-3, 2010; London, UK.
4. General Medical Council. Continuing professional development: An international perspective. 2011. http://www.gmc-uk.org/CPD-The-International-Perspective-Jul-11. pdf-44810902.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2014.
5. Iglehart JK, Baron RB. Ensuring physicians competence-is maintenance of certification the answer? N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2543-2549.
6. General Medical Council. Supporting Information for Appraisal and Revalidation. 2012. http://www.gmc-uk. org/static/documents/content/Supporting-information-for-appraisal-and-revalidation. pdf. Accessed June 9, 2014.
7. Irvine D. A short history of the General Medical Council. Med Educ. 2006;40:202-211.
8. Merrison. Merrison Report: Report of the Committee of Inquiry Into the Regulation of the Medical Profession. London, UK: Her Majestys Stationary Office; 1975.
9. Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA). Revalidation research. 2013. http://www1.plymouth.ac.uk/peninsula/research/camera/revalidation/Pages/default. aspx. Accessed June 10, 2014.
10. Petersen A. The Body in Question: A Sociocultural Approach. London, UK: Routledge; 2007.
11. Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge; 1972.
12. Foucault M. On governmentality. In: Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P, eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1991.
13. Rose N. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
14. Torfing J. New Theories of Discourse. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1999.
15. Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S. Discourse analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a879.
16. Freidson E. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. New York, NY: Atherton Press; 1970.
17. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry: Summary. London, UK: Department of Health; 2001.
18. The Committee of Inquiry to Investigate How the NHS Handled Allegations About the Conduct of Clifford Ayling. London, UK: Department of Health; 2004.
19. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34:205-214.
20. Archer J, Regan de Bere S, Brennan N, Lynn N. Evaluating the strategic impact of medical revalidation: Building an evaluation framework. December 2013. http://www. gmc-uk.org/about/research/23660.asp. Accessed August 2, 2014.