Introduction

The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Adler, Matthew D ^a   Himma, Kenneth Einar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dworkin; H. L. A. Hart; Hart Dworkin debate; Legal system; Recognition model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920751324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195343298.003.0014     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. H.L.A. HART, THE CONCEPT OF LAW (Penelope A. Bulloch & Joseph Raz eds., 2d ed. 1994).
2. See, e.g., JULES COLEMAN, THE PRACTICE OF PRINCIPLE (2001);
3. HART'S POSTSCRIPT (Jules Coleman ed., 2001);
4. MATTHEW KRAMER, WHERE LAW AND MORALITY MEET (2004);
5. ANDREI MARMOR, POSITIVE LAW AND OBJECTIVE VALUES (2001);
6. JOSEPH RAZ, ETHICS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (1994);
7. SCOTT SHAPIRO, LEGALITY (forthcoming);
8. W. J. WALUCHOW, INCLUSIVE LEGAL POSITIVISM (1994).
9. See also RONALD DWORKIN, TAKING RIGHTS SERIOUSLY (1977).
10. See, e.g., SCOTT HERSHOVITZ, EXPLORING LAW'S EMPIRE: THE JURISPRUDENCE OF RONALD DWORKIN (2006);
11. NICOS STAVROPOULOS, OBJECTIVITY IN LAW (1996).
12. 85 MICH. L. REV. 621 (1987).
13. Kenneth Einar Himma, Making Sense of Constitutional Disagreement:Legal Positivism, the Bill of Rights, and the Conventional Rule of Recognition in the United States, 4 J. L. SOC'Y 149 (2003);
14. Final Authority to Bind with Moral Mistakes: On the Explanatory Potential of Inclusive Legal Positivism, 24 LAW & PHIL. 1 (2005).
15. See Matthew D. Adler, Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition: Whose Practices Ground U.S. Law?, 100 NW. U. L. REV. 719 (2006).
16. See David A. Strauss, Common Law Constitutional Interpretation, 63 U. CHI. L. REV. 877 (1996).