Development and initial porcine and cadaver experience with three-dimensional printing of endoscopic and laparoscopic equipment

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 58-62

  Del Junco, Michael ^a   Okhunov, Zhamshid ^a   Yoon, Renai ^a   Khanipour, Ramtin ^a   Juncal, Samuel ^a   Abedi, Garen ^a   Lusch, Achim ^a   Landman, Jaime ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DIGITAL CALIPER; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PORCINE MODEL; PRINTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TROCAR; URETER CATHETER; URETER STENT; ANIMAL; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; PIG; STENT; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; URETER;

ANIMALS; CADAVER; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ENDOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PILOT PROJECTS; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; STENTS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SWINE; URETER;

EID: 84920736206     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0280     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kaplan S, Sadler B, Little K, et al. Can sustainable hospitals help bend the health care cost curve? Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2012;29:1.
2. Kwakye G, Brat G, Makary M. Green surgical practices for health care. Arch Surg 2011;146:131.
3. Practice Greenhealth: Greening the OR: Guidance Documents. Available at: www.c4spgh.org/HCW1-Presentations/GOR-FullSet-GuidanceDocs-Web-042711.pdf, 2011 (Accessed 26 Oct 2012).
4. McGain E, Hendel S, Story D. An audit of potentially recyclable waste from anaesthetic practice. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37:820.
5. Tieszen M, Gruenberg J. A quantitative, qualitative, and critical assessment of surgical waste. Surgeons venture through the trash can. JAMA 1992;267:2765.
6. Garcia R. Effective cost-reduction strategies in the management of regulated medical waste. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:165.
7. Conrardy J, Hillanbrand M, Myers S, et al. Reducing medical waste. AORN J 2010;91:711.
8. Park K, Dickerson C. Can efficient supply management in the operating room save millions? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22:242.
9. Healthcare Financial Management Association. Achieving operating room efficiency through process integration. Healthc Financ Manage 2003;57:suppl 1.
10. Wittbrodt B, Glover A, Laureto J, et al. Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with opensource 3-D printers. Mechatronics 2013;23:713.
11. Lee R, Mears S. Reducing and recycling in joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1757.
12. Fang J, Liu J, Wu T, et al. Complex facial deformity reconstruction with a surgical guide incorporating a built-in occlusal stent as the positioning reference. JCraniofac Surg 2013;24:e260.
13. Li J, Hsu Y, Luo E, et al. Computer-aided design and manufacturing and rapid prototyped nanoscale hydroxyapatite/polyamide (n-HA/PA) construction for condylar defect caused by mandibular angle ostectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35:636.
14. Cohen A, Laviv A, Berman P, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:661.
15. Zopf D, Hollister S, Nelson M, et al. Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2043.
16. Mannoor M, Jiang Z, James T, et al. 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett 2013;13:2634.
17. Tarnay C, Glass K, Munro M. Incision characteristics associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: A randomized, observer-blinded comparison. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:89.
18. Cartiaux O, Paul L, Francq B, et al. Improved accuracy with 3D planning and patient-specific instruments during simulated pelvic bone tumor surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 2014;42:205.