Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials

ACM BCB 2014 - 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 88-95

  Marshall, Iain J ^a   Kuiper, Joël ^b   Wallace, Byron C ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; TEXT MINING;

BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE; CLINICAL RESEARCHERS; COCHRANE DATABASE; EVIDENCE- BASED DECISIONS; EXPONENTIAL GROWTH; STANDARD PRACTICES; STRUCTURED DATA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84920724335     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2649387.2649406     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. H. Bastian, P. Glasziou, and I. Chalmers. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS medicine, 7(9), 2010.
2. S. Brody and N. Elhadad. An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 804-812. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
3. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. 268(17):2420-2425, 1992.
4. L. Hartling, M. Ospina, and Y. Liang. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ, 339:b4012, 2009.
5. J. Higgins, D. Altman, P. Gotzsche, P. Juni, D. Moher, A. Oxman, J. Savovic, K. Schulz, L. Weeks, and J. Sterne. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, 2011.
6. B. Liu and L. Zhang. A survey of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. In Mining Text Data, pages 415-463. 2012.
7. M. Mintz, S. Bills, R. Snow, and D. Jurafsky. Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the Annual Meeting of the ACL and the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, volume 2, pages 1003-1011. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
8. T. Nguyen and A. Moschitti. End-to-end relation extraction using distant supervision from external semantic repositories. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: short papers, volume 2, pages 277-282. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011.
9. B. Pang, B. Pang, L. Lee, and L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2:1-135, 2008.
10. The Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014.
11. I. Titov and R. McDonald. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), volume 51, page 61801, 2008.
12. G. Tsafnat, A. Dunn, P. Glasziou, and E. Coiera. The automation of systematic reviews. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 346, 2013.
13. G. Valkenhoef, T. Tervonen, B. Brock, and H. Hillege. Deficiencies in the transfer and availability of clinical trials evidence: A review of existing systems and standards. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(1):95, 2012.
14. V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 1-47, 6.
15. B. Wallace, I. Dahabreh, C. Schmid, J. Lau, and T. Trikalinos. Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: Tools and methods. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2(3):273-282, 2013.