Government Takings of Private Property

Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Nadler, Janice ^a   Diamond, Shari Seidman ^a   Patton, Matthew M ^b,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Eminent domain; Expectations; Fifth amendment; Private property; Takings decisions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920698164     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329414.003.0013     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Ackerman, B. 1977. Private Property and the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Americans for Limited Government. 2005. "Protecting Property Rights across the Country." Available online at http://www.getliberty.org/campaigns/propertyrights/index.php. Accessed August 17, 2007.
3. Barron, D. 2005. "High Court's Ruling Has Ample Precedent." Orlando Sentinel, July 8, A23.
4. Brady, J. 2006. "WesternVoters Consider Property Rights Changes." National Public Radio. Available at online http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyID=6102255. Accessed August 17, 2007.
5. Calvert, J. W. 1979. "The Social and Ideological Bases of Support for Environmental Legislation: An Examination of Public Attitudes and Legislative Action." Western Political Quarterly 32: 327-37.
6. Canellos, P. 2005. "High Court Backs Seizure of Land for Development." Boston Globe, . June 24, A1.
7. Cronin, T. E. 1989. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. Dana, D. A., and T. W. Merrill. 2002. Property: Takings. New York: Foundation Press.
9. "Eminent Latitude." 2005, Washington Post, June 24, A30.
10. Epstein, R. A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Espeland, W. 1998. "Commensuration as a Social Process." Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313-43.
12. Fischel, W. A. 2004. "The Political Economy of Public Use in Poletown: How Federal Grants Encourage Excessive Use of Eminent Domain." Michigan State Law Review 2004: 929.
13. "Hands off Our Homes: Property Rights and Eminent Domain." 2005. Economist, August 20.
14. Institute for Justice. 2005. "IJ's $3 Million National Campaign Tells Lawmakers: "Hands off My Home." Available at http://ij.org/private_property/castle/6_29_05pr. html. Accessed August 17, 2007.
15. "The Limits of Property Rights." 2005. New York Times, June 24, A22.
16. Kanner, G. 2006. "The Public Use Clause: Constitutional Mandate or "Hortatory Fluff? "" Pepperdine Law Review 33: 335-384.
17. Magleby, D. B. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Magleby, D. B. 1995. "Governing by Initiative: Let the Voters Decide? An Assessment of the Initiative and Referendum Process." University of Colorado Law Review 66: 13.
19. Mahoney, J. D. 2005. "Kelo's Legacy: Eminent Domain and the Future of Property Rights." Supreme Court Review 103-33.
20. Merrill, T. W. 1986. "The Economics of Public Use." Cornell Law Review 72: 61.
21. Mohl, R. A. 1993. "Race and Space in the Modern City." In Urban Policy in Twentieth Century America, edited by Arnold R. Hirsch and Raymond A. Mohl. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
22. Posner, R. A. 2006. "Judicial Autonomy in a Political Environment." Arizona State Law Journal 38: 1.
23. Pritchett, W. E. 2003. "The 'Public Menace' of Blight: Urban Renewal and the Private Uses of Eminent Domain." Yale Law .. Policy Review 21: 1.
24. Pritchett, W. E. 2006. "Beyond Kelo: Thinking about Urban Development in the 21st Century." Georgia State Law Review 22: 895.
25. Schauer, F. 2006. "The Court's Agenda-And the Nation's." Harvard Law Review 120: 4-64.
26. Somin, I. 2007. "The Limits of Backlash: Assessing the Political Response to Kelo." Working paper, on file with authors.
27. Stevens, J. P. 2006. "Learning on the Job." Fordham Law Review 74: 1561.
28. Tuohy, L. 2005. "5-4, For the Takings; High Court: City Can Seize Homes to Boost Economy." Hartford Courant, . June 24, A1.
29. Tribe, L. H. 2000. American Constitutional Law, 3rd ed.A
30. U.S. Senate. 2005. "The Kelo. Decision: Investigating Takings of Homes and Other Private Property." Hearing before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, September 20. Testimony of Thomas Merrill, Columbia Law School.