The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 47, Issue 16, 2014, Pages 3882-3890

  Xiang, J ^a,b,c   Siddiqui, A H ^a,c   Meng, H ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b State University of New York   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d University at Buffalo SUNY   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary condition; Computational flow dynamics; Inlet waveform; Intracranial aneurysm; Oscillatory shear index; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY DISSIPATION; HEMODYNAMICS; INLET FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; WAKES;

COMPUTATIONAL FLOWS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; OSCILLATORY SHEAR INDEX; WALL SHEAR STRESS; WAVE FORMS;

SHEAR FLOW;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CASE REPORT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION; SACCULAR ANEURYSM; SHEAR STRESS; WAVEFORM; ANEURYSM, RUPTURED; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; COMPLICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AGED; ANEURYSM, RUPTURED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84920693634     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.09.034     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Antiga L., Piccinelli M., Botti L., Ene-Iordache B., Remuzzi A., Steinman D.A. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2008, 46:1097-1112.
2. Boussel L., Rayz V., McCulloch C., Martin A., Acevedo-Bolton G., Lawton M., Higashida R., Smith W.S., Young W.L., Saloner D. Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 2008, 39:2997-3002.
3. Broderick J.P., Brott T.G., Duldner J.E., Tomsick T., Leach A. Initial and recurrent bleeding are the major causes of death following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1994, 25:1342-1347.
4. Castro M., Putman C., Radaelli A., Frangi A., Cebral J. Hemodynamics and rupture of terminal cerebral aneurysms. Acad. Radiol. 2009, 16:1201-1207.
5. Cebral J.R., Castro M.A., Appanaboyina S., Putman C.M., Millan D., Frangi A.F. Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2005, 24:457-467.
6. Cebral J.R., Castro M.A., Burgess J.E., Pergolizzi R.S., Sheridan M.J., Putman C.M. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26:2550-2559.
7. Cebral J.R., Meng H. Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics--closing the gap. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 33:396-398.
8. Cebral J.R., Mut F., Weir J., Putman C. Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011, 32:145-151.
9. Cross D.T., Tirschwell D.L., Clark M.A., Tuden D., Derdeyn C.P., Moran C.J., Dacey R.G. Mortality rates after subarachnoid hemorrhage: variations according to hospital case volume in 18 states. J. Neurosurg. 2003, 99:810-817.
10. Dempere-Marco, L., Oubel, E., Castro, M., Putman, C., Frangi, A., Cebral, J., 2006. CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention: MICCAI. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 9, pp. 438-445.
11. Dhar S., Tremmel M., Mocco J., Kim M., Yamamoto J., Siddiqui A.H., Hopkins L.N., Meng H. Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008, 63:185-196. (discussion 196-187).
12. Evju O., Valen-Sendstad K., Mardal K.A. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions. J. Biomech. 2013, 46:2802-2808.
13. Fahrig R., Nikolov H., Fox A.J., Holdsworth D.W. A three-dimensional cerebrovascular flow phantom. Med. Phys. 1999, 26:1589-1599.
14. Fedorov B.M., Sebekina T.V., Sinitsyna T.M., Strel'tsova E.N., Vakulenko V.M., Nikolaeva T.G. Stress and blood circulation in man. Kosm. Biol. Aviakosm. Med. 1990, 24:35-40.
15. Ford M.D., Alperin N., Lee S.H., Holdsworth D.W., Steinman D.A. Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol. Meas. 2005, 26:477-488.
16. Geers A.J., Larrabide I., Morales H.G., Frangi A.F. Approximating hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms with steady flow simulations. J. Biomech. 2014, 47:178-185.
17. Gonzalez-Alonso J., Dalsgaard M.K., Osada T., Volianitis S., Dawson E.A., Yoshiga C.C., Secher N.H. Brain and central haemodynamics and oxygenation during maximal exercise in humans. J. Physiol. 2004, 557:331-342.
18. Hajjar I., Selim M., Novak P., Novak V. The relationship between nighttime dipping in blood pressure and cerebral hemodynamics in nonstroke patients. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich) 2007, 9:929-936.
19. Hassan T., Timofeev E.V., Saito T., Shimizu H., Ezura M., Tominaga T., Takahashi A., Takayama K. Computational replicas: anatomic reconstructions of cerebral vessels as volume numerical grids at three-dimensional angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004, 25:1356-1365.
20. Hoi Y., Wasserman B.A., Lakatta E.G., Steinman D.A. Carotid bifurcation hemodynamics in older adults: effect of measured versus assumed flow waveform. J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 132:071006.
21. Hop J.W., Rinkel G.J., Algra A., van Gijn J. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 1997, 28:660-664.
22. Ide K., Secher N.H. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism during exercise. Prog. Neurobiol. 2000, 61:397-414.
23. Jou L.D., Lee D.H., Morsi H., Mawad M.E. Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008, 29:1761-1767.
24. Jou L.D., Quick C.M., Young W.L., Lawton M.T., Higashida R., Martin A., Saloner D. Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003, 24:1804-1810.
25. Kallmes D.F. Point: CFD-computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 33:395-396.
26. Kawaguchi T., Nishimura S., Kanamori M., Takazawa H., Omodaka S., Sato K., Maeda N., Yokoyama Y., Midorikawa H., Sasaki T., Nishijima M. Distinctive flow pattern of wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index: similarity and dissimilarity in ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysm blebs. J. Neurosurg. 2012, 117:774-780.
27. Kulikov V.P., Grechishnikov V.N., Sidor M.V. [Response of cerebral hemodynamics to combined stress impacts]. Patol. Fiziol. Eksp. Ter. 2005, 7-9.
28. Lee S.W., Steinman D.A. On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129:273-278.
29. Lu G., Huang L., Zhang X.L., Wang S.Z., Hong Y., Hu Z., Geng D.Y. Influence of hemodynamic factors on rupture of intracranial aneurysms: patient-specific 3D mirror aneurysms model computational fluid dynamics simulation. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011, 32:1255-1261.
30. Marzo A., Singh P., Larrabide I., Radaelli A., Coley S., Gwilliam M., Wilkinson I.D., Lawford P., Reymond P., Patel U., Frangi A., Hose D.R. Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 39:884-896.
31. Marzo A., Singh P., Reymond P., Stergiopulos N., Patel U., Hose R. Influence of inlet boundary conditions on the local haemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 12:431-444.
32. Meng H., Tutino V.M., Xiang J., Siddiqui A. High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. Am. J. Neuroradiol 2013.
33. Miura Y., Ishida F., Umeda Y., Tanemura H., Suzuki H., Matsushima S., Shimosaka S., Taki W. Low wall shear stress is independently associated with the rupture status of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 2013, 44:519-521.
34. Oka S., Nakai M. Optimality principle in vascular bifurcation. Biorheology 1987, 24:737-751.
35. Qian Y., Takao H., Umezu M., Murayama Y. Risk analysis of unruptured aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics technology: preliminary results. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011, 32:1948-1955.
36. Retarekar R., Ramachandran M., Berkowitz B., Harbaugh R.E., Hasan D., Rosenwasser R.H., Ogilvy C.S., Raghavan M.L. Stratification of a population of intracranial aneurysms using blood flow metrics. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng 2014.
37. Rinkel G.J., Djibuti M., Algra A., van Gijn J. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 1998, 29:251-256.
38. Robertson A.M., Watton P.N. Computational fluid dynamics in aneurysm research: critical reflections, future directions. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 33:992-995.
39. Shojima M., Oshima M., Takagi K., Torii R., Hayakawa M., Katada K., Morita A., Kirino T. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 2004, 35:2500-2505.
40. Steinman D.A. Image-based computational fluid dynamics modeling in realistic arterial geometries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 30:483-497.
41. Strother C.M., Jiang J. Intracranial aneurysms, cancer, x-rays, and computational fluid dynamics. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 33:991-992.
42. Sugiyama S., Meng H., Funamoto K., Inoue T., Fujimura M., Nakayama T., Omodaka S., Shimizu H., Takahashi A., Tominaga T. Hemodynamic analysis of growing intracranial aneurysms arising from a posterior inferior cerebellar artery. World Neurosurg. 2012, 78:462-468.
43. Takao H., Murayama Y., Otsuka S., Qian Y., Mohamed A., Masuda S., Yamamoto M., Abe T. Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 2012, 43:1436-1439.
44. Valen-Sendstad K., Mardal K.A., Steinman D.A. High-resolution CFD detects high-frequency velocity fluctuations in bifurcation, but not sidewall, aneurysms. J. Biomech. 2013, 46:402-407.
45. Valen-Sendstad K., Steinman D.A. Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2014, 35:536-543.
46. Xiang J., Natarajan S.K., Tremmel M., Ma D., Mocco J., Hopkins L.N., Siddiqui A.H., Levy E.I., Meng H. Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke-J. Cereb. Circ. 2011, 42:144-152.
47. Xiang J., Tremmel M., Kolega J., Levy E.I., Natarajan S.K., Meng H. Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk. J. Neurointerv. Surg 2011.
48. Xiang J., Tutino V.M., Snyder K.V., Meng H. CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? the role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Am. J. Neuroradiol 2013.
49. Zhang Y., Mu S., Chen J., Wang S., Li H., Yu H., Jiang F., Yang X. Hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms with daughter blebs. Eur. Neurol. 2011, 66:359-367.