Executive compensation: Something old, something new

Managing Human Resources in North America: Current Issues and Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 158-171

  Makri, Marianna ^a   Gomez Mejia, Luis R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920684568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203815243     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Beehr, T.A., Drexler, J.A., Jr. and Faulkner, S. (1997) Working in small family businesses: Empirical comparisons to non-family businesses. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 297-312.
2. Borrus, A. (2005) Learning to love Sarbanes-Oxley. Business Week, November 21 (3960): 126.
3. Colvin, G. (2005) Outraged over CEO exit packages? You’re too late. Fortune, March 7, 151(5): 62-63.
4. Countryman, A. (2005) Options lose ground in race to reward CEOs. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, May 16: 1.
5. Eisenmann, T.R. (2002) The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 513-534.
6. Elson, C., Roiter, E., Clapman, P., Bachelder, J., England, J., Lau, G. et al. (2003) What’s wrong with executive compensation? Harvard Business Review, 81(1): 5-12.
7. Fowler, T. (2004) Stock option excess may be costly to companies. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, July 18: 1.
8. France, M. and Lavelle, L. (2004) The new accountability. Business Week, July 26 (3893): 30.
9. Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M. and Makri, M. (2003) The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 226-237.
10. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
11. Lavelle, L. (2005) Fatter envelopes. Business Week, April 4 (3927): 13.
12. Makri, M., Lane, PJ. and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2006) CEO Incentives, Innovation, and Performance in Technology-intensive Firms. Working paper.
13. Mercer Human Resource Consulting (2005) M&A activity shifts governance spotlight to golden parachutes. Mercer HR Alert, May 16 (44).
14. Milkovich, G.T., Gerhart, B. and Hannon, J. (1991) The effects of research and development intensity on managerial compensation in large organizations. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2(1): 133-145.
15. Miller, J.S., Wiseman, R.M. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2002) The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 745-756.
16. Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N. and Buchholtz, A.K. (2001) Agency relationships in family firms. Organization Science, 12(2): 99-116.
17. Stephan, P. (1996) The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 1199-1235.
18. Tosi, H.L., Werner, S., Katz, J.P. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2000) How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2): 301-338.
19. Tosi, H., Misangyi, V., Fanelli, A., Waldman, D. and Yammarino, F. (2004) CEO charisma, compensation, and firm performance. Leadership Quarterly, 15(3): 405-427.
20. Useem, J. (2003) Have they no shame? Fortune, April 28, 147(8): 56-64