Understanding the barriers and myths limiting the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: Results of a survey of European/Canadian healthcare providers

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 183, Issue , 2014, Pages 146-154

  Buhling, Kai J ^a   Hauck, Brian ^b   Dermout, Sylvia ^c   Ardaens, Katty ^d   Marions, Lena ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c Department of Gynaecology Gynaecological Centre Dermout and Albicher   (Netherlands)

^d Department of Gynaecology Residence Paul Eluard Medical Centre   (France)

^e KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Barriers; Healthcare provider knowledge; Intrauterine contraception; Nulliparous; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; EUROPE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LITERATURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; OBSTETRICIAN; PAIN; PATIENT COUNSELING; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MIDWIFE; NURSE; OBSTETRICS; PARITY; PHYSICIAN; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CANADA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EUROPE; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MIDWIFERY; NURSES; OBSTETRICS; PARITY; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 84920671048     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. S. Singh, G. Sedgh, and R. Hussain Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes Stud Fam Plann 41 2010 241 250
2. L.B. Finer, and S.K. Henshaw Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 38 2006 90 96
3. J. Trussell Contraceptive failure in the United States Contraception 83 2011 397 404
4. J.F. Peipert, T. Madden, J.E. Allsworth, and G.M. Secura Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception Obstet Gynecol 120 2012 1291 1297
5. M. O'neil-Callahan, J.F. Peipert, Q. Zhao, T. Madden, and G. Secura Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception Obstet Gynecol 122 2013 1083 1091
6. J.F. Peipert, Q. Zhao, and J.E. Allsworth Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception Obstet Gynecol 117 2011 1105 1113
7. B. Winner, J.F. Peipert, and Q. Zhao C. Buckel Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception N Engl J Med 366 2012 1998 2007
8. World Health Organization Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use 4th ed. 2010 Available http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241563888-eng.pdf (accessed 23 May 2013)
9. Faculty of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists UK medical eligibility for contraceptive use 2009 Available http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/UKMEC2009.pdf (accessed 21 January 2013)
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010 2010 Available http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr59e0528.pdf (accessed 4 February 2013)
11. R. Lyus, P. Lohr, and S. Prager Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women Contraception 81 2010 367 371
12. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology ACOG practice bulletin no. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices Obstet Gynecol 118 2011 184 196
13. K. Black, P. Lotke, K.J. Buhling, and N.B. Zite A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 17 2012 340 350
14. T. Madden, J.E. Allsworth, K.J. Hladky, G.M. Secura, and J.F. Peipert Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes Contraception 81 2010 112 116
15. United Nations World contraceptive use 2013 2013 Available http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/worldContraceptivePatternsWallChart2013.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014)
16. K.I. Black, P. Lotke, J. Lira, T. Peers, and N.B. Zite Global survey of healthcare practitioners' beliefs and practices around intrauterine contraceptive method use in nulliparous women Contraception 88 2013 650 656
17. T.M. Farley, M.J. Rosenberg, P.J. Rowe, J.H. Chen, and O. Meirik Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective Lancet 339 1992 785 788
18. H. Weinstock, S. Berman, and W. Cates Jr. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 36 2004 6 10
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance: STDs in adolescents and young adults 2011 Available http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats10/adol.htm (accessed 4 February 2013)
20. L. Marions, L. Lövkvist, and A. Taube Use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system in nulliparous women - a non-interventional study in Sweden Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 16 2011 126 134
21. S. Suhonen, M. Haukkamaa, T. Jakobsson, and I. Rauramo Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study Contraception 69 2004 407 412
22. M.V. Bahamondes, M.M. Hidalgo, L. Bahamondes, and I. Monteiro Ease of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidas Contraception 84 2011 e11 e16
23. H.M. Veldhuis, A.G. Vos, and A.L. Lagro-Janssen Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women Eur J Gen Pract 10 2004 82 87
24. F.E. Skjeldestad How effectively do copper intrauterine devices prevent ectopic pregnancy? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76 1997 684 690
25. B. Trabert, V.L. Holt, O. Yu, S.K. Van Den Eeden, and D. Scholes Population-based ectopic pregnancy trends, 1993-2007 Am J Prev Med 42 2012 107 (Erratum)
26. J. Bouyer, J. Coste, and T. Shojaei Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France Am J Epidemiol 157 2003 185 194
27. C.M. Farquhar Ectopic pregnancy Lancet 366 2005 583 591
28. K. Gemzell-Danielsson, S. Cho, and P. Inki Use of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling - results of an international survey in 10 countries Contraception 86 2012 631 638
29. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals New developments in intrauterine contraception: use of intrauterine contraception in the United States 2004 Available http://www.arhp.org/Publications-and-Resources/Clinical-Proceedings/CP-Archives (accessed 1 November 2011)
30. S.R. Drosman, K. Gemzell-Danielsson, R. Lynen, K. Rosen, and A. Nelson A multicenter, randomized, Phase III study of two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) for contraception: a subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety in nulliparous versus parous women Abstract and poster presented at the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (ARHP) annual meeting 2013
31. E. Caliskan, N. Özturk, Dilbaz B.Ö., and S. Dilbaz Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8 2003 150 155
32. M. Harrison-Woolrych, J. Ashton, and D. Coulter Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception 67 2003 53 56
33. A. Brockmeyer, M. Kishen, and A. Webb Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women - a pilot study Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 13 2008 248 254
34. A.L. Nelson, D. Apter, and B. Hauck Two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 122 2013 1205 1213