The Cognitive Chicken: Visual and Spatial Cognition in a Nonmammalian Brain

Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Vallortigara, Giorgio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Animal intelligence; Animal learning; Chicken; Cognition; Cognitive abilities; Comparative psychology; Gestalt psychology; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920659557     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377804.003.0004     Document Type: Chapter

References (122)

1. Andrew, R. J. (1991). The chick in experiment: Techniques and tests. General. In R. J. Andrew (Ed.), Neural and behavioural plasticity (pp. 6-11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aoki, N., Izawa, E., Yanagihara, S., & Matsushima, T. (2003). Neural correlates of memorized associations and cued movements in archistriatum of the domestic chick. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1935-1946.
3. Bingman, V. P., Gagliardo, A., Hough, G. E., Ioalé, P., Kahn, M., & Siegel, J. J. (2005). The avian hippocampus: Homing in pigeons and the memory representation of large-scale space. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 555-564.
4. Bravo, M., Blake, R., & Morrison, S. (1988). Cats see subjective contours. Vision Research, 28, 861-865.
5. Campbell, D. (1988). Object permanence in the domestic hen (Gallus domesticus). Honors dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
6. Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12, 1-6.
7. Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149-178.
8. Clayton, N. S. (1998). Memory and the hippocampus in food-storing birds: A comparative approach. Neuropharmacology, 37, 441-452.
9. Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. D. (1999a). Memory for the content of caches by scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 82-91.
10. Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. D. (1999b). Motivational control of caching behaviour in the scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens. Animal Behaviour, 57, 435-444.
11. Cook, R. G. (2001). Hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved August 29, 2005, from.
12. Corballis, P. M., Fendrich, R., Shapley, R., & Gazzaniga, M. (1999). Illusory contour perception and amodal boundary completion: Evidence of a dissociation following callosotomy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 459-466.
13. Cozzutti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2001). Hemispheric memories for the content and position of food caches in the domestic chick. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 305-313.
14. Deipolyi, A., Santos, L., & Hauser, M. D. (2001). The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: Evidence for geometric and non-geometric features. Animal Cognition, 4, 99-108.
15. Deng, C., & Rogers, L. J. (1997). Differential contributions of the two visual pathways to functional lateralization in chicks. Behavioural Brain Research, 87, 173-182.
16. Deng, C., & Rogers, L. J. (1998a). Bilaterally projecting neurons in the two visual pathways of chicks. Brain Research, 794, 281-290.
17. Deng, C., & Rogers, L. J. (1998b). Organisation of the tectorotundal and SP/IPS-rotundal projections in the chick. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 394, 171-185.
18. Diamond, A., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989). Comparison of human infants and infant rhesus monkeys on Piaget's AB task: Evidence for dependence on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 74, 24-40.
19. DiPietro, N. T., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2002). Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition. Perception, 31, 1299-1312.
20. Dumas, C., & Wilkie, D. M. (1995). Object permanence in ring doves. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 142-150.
21. Etienne, A. S. (1973). Searching behaviour towards a disappearing prey in the domestic chick as affected by preliminary experience. Animal Behaviour, 21, 749-761.
22. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Forkman, B. (1998). Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception, 27, 861-867.
24. Forkman, B. (2000). Domestic hens have declarative representations. Animal Cognition, 3, 135-137.
25. Forkman, B., & Vallortigara, G. (1999). Minimization of modal contours: An essential cross species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Animal Cognition, 4, 181-185.
26. Foster, T. M., Temple, W., MacKenzie, C., Demello, L. R., & Poling, A. (1995). Delayed matching-to-sample performance of hens. Effects of sample duration and response requirements during the sample. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 19-31.
27. Freire, F., & Nicol, C. J. (1997). Object permanence in chicks: Predicting the position of an occluded imprinted object. Abstracts of the ASAB Meeting Biological Aspects of Learning, St Andrews, Scotland, July 1-4, 1997, p. 21.
28. Freire, F., & Nicol, C. J. (1999). Effect of experience of occlusion events on the domestic chick's strategy for locating a concealed imprinting object. Animal Behaviour, 58, 593-599.
29. Fujita, K. (2001). Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia). Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 115-125.
30. Funk, M. S. (1996). Development of object permanence in the New Zealand parakeet (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Animal Learning and Behavior, 24, 375-383.
31. Fuster, J. M. (1989). The prefrontal cortex (2nd ed.). New York: Raven Press.
32. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Gardner, H. (1987). The mind's new science. A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
34. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1987). Development of cortical circuitry and cognitive function. Child Development, 58, 601-622.
35. Gouteux, S., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Vauclair, J. (2001). Rhesus monkeys use geometric and non-geometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 505-519.
36. Gray, E. R., Spetch, M. L., Kelly, D. M., & Nguyen, A. (2004). Searching in the centre: Pigeons encode relative distance from walls of an enclosure. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 113-117.
37. Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon colour spreading. Psychological Review, 92, 173-211.
38. Güntürkün, O. (1997). Avian visual lateralization: A review. Neuroreport, 8, 3-11.
39. Güntürkün, O., & Durstewitz, D. (2001). Multi-modal areas of the avian forebrain-Blueprints for cognition? In G. Roth & M. Wulliman (Eds.), Evolution of the brain and cognition (pp. 431-450). New York: Wiley.
40. Güntürkün, O., & Hahmann, U. (1999). Functional subdivisions of the ascending visual pathways in the pigeon. Behavioural Brain Research, 98, 193-201.
41. Haskell, M., & Forkman, B. (1997). An investigation into object permanence in the domestic hen. Abstracts of the ASAB Meeting Biological Aspects of Learning, St Andrews, Scotland, July 1-4, 1997, p. 22.
42. Hellmann, B., & Güntürkün, O. (1999). Visual field specific heterogeneity within the tectofugal projection of the pigeon. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1-18.
43. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59.
44. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195-232.
45. Hermer-Vasquez, L., Spelke, E. S., & Katsnelson, A. S. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3-36.
46. Herz, M. (1926). Beobachtugen an gefangenen Rabenvögeln. Psychologische Forschung, 8, 336-397.
47. Herz, M. (1928). Wahrnehmungspsychologische Untersuchungen am Eichelhäher. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 7, 144-194.
48. Herz, M. (1935). Die Untersuchungen über den Formensinn der Honigbiene. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 618-624.
49. Hetherington, M. M., & Rolls, B. J. (1996). Sensory-specific satiety: Theoretical issues and central characteristics. In E. D. Capaldi (Ed.), Why we eat what we eat (pp. 267-290). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50. Hodos, W., Macko, K. A., & Bessette, B. B. (1984). Near-field acuity changes after visual system lesions in pigeons. II. Telencephalon. Behavioural Brain Research, 13, 15-30.
51. Horn, G. (1998). Visual imprinting and the neural mechanisms of recognition memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 300-305.
52. Hunter, W. S. (1913). The delayed reaction in animals and children. Behavior Monographs, 2, 1-86.
53. Kalt, T., Diekamp, B., & Güntürkün, O. (1999). Single unit activity during a go/nogo task in the "prefrontal cortex" of the pigeon. Brain Research, 839, 263-278.
54. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision. New York: Praeger.
55. Kanizsa, G., Renzi, P., Conte, S., Compostela, C., & Guerani, L. (1993). Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception, 22, 713-722.
56. Kellman, P. J., & Arterberry, M. E. (1998). The cradle of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
58. Kelly, D. M., Spetch, M. L., & Heth, C. D. (1998). Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 259-269.
59. Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved August 29, 2005, from.
60. Koehler, O. (1950). The ability of birds to count. Bulletin of Animal Behaviour, 9, 41-45.
61. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognising the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
62. Lea, S. E. G., Slater, A. M., & Ryan, C. M. E. (1996). Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant. Infant Behaviour and Development, 19, 501-504.
63. MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Martinoya, C., Rivaud, S., & Bloch, S. (1984). Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in pigeons: II. Velocity thresholds for movement discrimination. Behavioural Brain Research, 8, 375-385.
65. Matsushima, T., Izawa, E.-I., Aoki, N., & Yanagihara, S. (2003). The mind through chick eyes: Memory, cognition and anticipation. Zoological Science, 20, 395-408.
66. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
67. Michotte, A. Thines, G., & Crabbe, G. (1964). Les Complements Amodaux des Structures Perceptives (Amodal Completion of Perceptual Structures) (Studia Psychologica). Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Lou-vain. (in French).
68. Mogensen, J., & Divac, I. (1982). The prefrontal "cortex" in the pigeon. Behavioral evidence. Brain Behavior Evolution, 21, 60-66.
69. Nieder, A., & Wagner, H. (1999). Perception and neuronal coding of subjective contours in the owl. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 660-663.
70. Pearce, J. M., Ward-Robinson, J., Good, M., Fussell, C., & Aydin, A. (2001). Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 329-344.
71. Pepperberg, I. M., & Funk, M. S. (1990). Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: An African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus), and a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus). Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 97-108. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
72. Kelly, D. M., Spetch, M. L., & Heth, C. D. (1998). Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 259-269.
73. Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In R. G. Cook (Ed.), Avian visual cognition. Retrieved August 29, 2005, from.
74. Koehler, O. (1950). The ability of birds to count. Bulletin of Animal Behaviour, 9, 41-45.
75. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognising the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
76. Lea, S. E. G., Slater, A. M., & Ryan, C. M. E. (1996). Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant. Infant Behaviour and Development, 19, 501-504.
77. MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Martinoya, C., Rivaud, S., & Bloch, S. (1984). Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in pigeons: II. Velocity thresholds for movement discrimination. Behavioural Brain Research, 8, 375-385.
79. Matsushima, T., Izawa, E.-I., Aoki, N., & Yanagihara, S. (2003). The mind through chick eyes: Memory, cognition and anticipation. Zoological Science, 20, 395-408.
80. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
81. Michotte, A. Thines, G., & Crabbe, G. (1964). Les Complements Amodaux des Structures Perceptives (Amodal Completion of Perceptual Structures) (Studia Psychologica). Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Lou-vain. (in French).
82. Mogensen, J., & Divac, I. (1982). The prefrontal "cortex" in the pigeon. Behavioral evidence. Brain Behavior Evolution, 21, 60-66.
83. Nieder, A., & Wagner, H. (1999). Perception and neuronal coding of subjective contours in the owl. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 660-663.
84. Pearce, J. M., Ward-Robinson, J., Good, M., Fussell, C., & Aydin, A. (2001). Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 329-344.
85. Pepperberg, I. M., & Funk, M. S. (1990). Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: An African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus), and a cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus). Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 97-108. and Biobehavioral Reviews, 20, 487-503.
86. Rogers, L. J., & Andrew, R. J. (2002). Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Rolls, B. J. (1990). The role of sensory-specific satiety in food intake and food selection. In E. D. Capaldi & T. L. Powley (Eds.), Taste, experience and feeding (pp. 197-209). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
88. Rose, S. P. R. (2000). God's organism? The chick as a model system for memory studies. Learning and Memory, 7, 1-17.
89. Sekuler, A. B., Lee, J. A. J., & Shettleworth, S. J. (1996). Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception, 25, 1109-1120.
90. Sekuler, A. B., & Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
91. Shettleworth, S. J. (1990). Spatial memory in food-storing birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Biology), 329, 143-151.
92. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (1992). Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 97-106.
93. Singh, M., Hoffman, D., & Albert, M. (1999). Contour completion and relative depth: Petter's rule and support ratio. Psychological Science, 10, 423-428.
94. Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2003). Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition, 85, 51-59.
95. Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2003). Modularity as a fish views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 199-210.
96. Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2005). Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: Effects of the size of the experimental space. Cognition, 97, 121-133.
97. Spalding, D. A. (1873). Instinct; with original observations on young animals. Macmillans Magazine, 27, 282-293.
98. Spelke, E. S. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind. Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., & MacDonald, S. E. (1996). Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 55-68.
100. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., MacDonald, S. E., Linkenhoker, B.A., Kelly, D. M., & Doerkson, S. (1997). Learning the configuration of a landmark array in pigeons and humans. II. Generality across search tasks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 14-24.
101. Tommasi, L., Bressan, P., & Vallortigara, G. (1995). Solving occlusion indeterminacy in chromatically homogeneous patterns. Perception, 24, 391-403.
102. Tommasi, L., Gagliardo, A., Andrew, R. J., & Vallortigara, G. (2003). Separate processing mechanisms for encoding geometric and landmark information in the avian brain. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1695-1702.
103. Tommasi, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2000). Searching for the centre: Spatial cognition in the domestic chick. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 477-486.
104. Tommasi, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2001). Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the avian brain. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 602-613.
105. Tommasi, L., Vallortigara, G., & Zanforlin, M. (1997). Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 180, 567-572.
106. Towe, A. L. (1954). A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 283-287.
107. Vallortigara, G. (2000). Comparative neuropsy-chology of the dual brain: A stroll through left and right animals' perceptual worlds. Brain and Language, 73, 189-219.
108. Vallortigara, G. (2002). Other minds, other brains. Comparative cognition and consciousness. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Exploring Consciousness: Humanities, Natural Sciences, Religion (pp. 61-79). Milan: Fondazione Carlo Erba.
109. Vallortigara, G. (2004). Visual cognition and representation in birds and primates. In L. J. Rogers & G. Kaplan (Eds.), Vertebrate comparative cognition: Are primates special? (pp. 57-94). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
110. Vallortigara, G., Cozzutti, C., Tommasi, L., & Rogers, L. J. (2001). How birds use their eyes: Opposite left-right specialisation for the lateral and frontal visual hemifield in the domestic chick. Current Biology, 11, 29-33.
111. Vallortigara, G., Feruglio, M., & Sovrano, V. A. (2005). Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different spatial size. Developmental Science, 8, 393-401.
112. Vallortigara, G., Pagni, P., & Sovrano, V. A. (2004). Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: Evidence from a lopsided animal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 390-400.
113. Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2002). Facing an obstacle: Lateralization of object and spatial cognition. In R. J. Andrew & L. J. Rogers (Eds.), Comparative vertebrate lateralization (pp. 383-444). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Vallortigara, G., Regolin, L., Rigoni, M., & Zan-forlin, M. (1998). Delayed search for a concealed imprinted object in the domestic chick. Animal Cognition, 1, 17-24.
115. Vallortigara, G., Rogers, L. J., & Bisazza, A. (1999). Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Research Reviews, 30, 164-175.
116. Vallortigara, G., & Sovrano, V. A. (2002). Conjoining information from different modules: A comparative perspective. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 25, 701-702.
117. Vallortigara, G., & Tommasi, L. (2001). Minimization of modal contours: An instance of an evolutionary internalized geometric regularity? Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 706-707.
118. Vallortigara, G., Zanforlin, M., & Pasti, G. (1990). Geometric modules in animal's spatial representation: A test with chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 248-254.
119. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
120. Watanabe, S., & Ito, Y. (1991). Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behaviour, 9, 20-29.
121. Wu, H. M., Sackett, G. P., & Gunderson, V. M. (1986). Social stimuli as incentives for delayed response performance by infant Pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Primates, 27, 229-236.
122. Zanforlin, M. (1981). Visual perception of complex forms (anomalous surfaces) in chicks. Italian Journal of Psychology, 8, 1-16.