The “Use and Abuse” of Arts Advocacy and Consequences for Music Education

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 3-21

  Gee, Constance Bumgarner ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920659099     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: 19404395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632910209600294     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Jacques Barzun, The Use and Abuse of Art (Princeton University Press: Princeton and London 1974), 3-4.
2. Tom Wolfe, The Painted Word (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1975), 4.
3. Constance Bumgarner Gee, “For You Dear-Anything! (Remembering and Returning to First Principles)” Part 2, Arts Education Policy Review 100 (5): 3-22.
4. American Arts Alliance, “Advocacy Materials for Arts Supporters,“. 2000, 2
5. “Dispelling Myths about National Support of the Arts & Culture,” , 2000. 2.
6. Cristo Pantev and Robert Oostenveld, et al., “Increased Auditory Cortical Representation in Musicians,” Nature, 23 April 1998, 811-814
7. Martin Gardiner. Alan Fox, Faith Knowles, and Donna Jeffrey, “Learning Improved by Arts Training.” Nature. 23 May 1996,284
8. Francis Rauscher, Gordon Shaw, and Katherine Ky, “Music and Spatial Task Performance,” Nature. October 1993. 611
9. Francis Rauscher, Gordon Shaw, and Katherine Ky, “Listening to Mozart Enhances Spatial- Temporal Reasoning: Towards a Neurophysiological Basis,” Neuroscience Letters, February 1995.44-47
10. Temple Grandin, Matthew Peterson, and Gordon Shaw, “Spatial- Temporal versus Language-Analytic Reasoning: The Role of Music Training,” Arts Education Policy Review, 99 (6): 11-14
11. Frances H. Rauscher et al., “Music Training Causes Long-Tern Enhancement of Preschool Children’s Reasoning,” Neurological Research. February 1997. no. 2.
12. June Hinckley, Teaching Music 6 (6):6-7
13. John W. Flohr, et al., “Recent Brain Research on Young Children,” Teaching Music 6 (6): 41-43.
14. Bennett Reimer, “Facing the Risks of the ‘Mozart Effect’,” Music Educators Journal (Music Educators National Conference) July 1999, 37-43.
15. Yamaha Band & Orchestral Division, “Discover the Power of Music Education.” Advocacy Report, Spring 1999.
16. Ella Wilcox, “Straight Talk about Music and Brian Research,” Teaching Music 7 (3): 29-35.
17. Samuel Hope’s “Promotion: Past Failures, Present Urgencies,” in Design for Arts Educution (now Arts Education Policy Review), November/December 1985, 14-22.
18. Temple Grandin, et al., “Spatial- Temporal versus Language-Analytic Reasoning: The Role of Music Education,” Arts Education Policy Review 99 (6): 11-14.
19. Elliot W. Eisner, “Does Experience in the Arts Boost Academic Achievement?’ Art Education 51 (1): 7-15.
20. Bennett Reimer, “Facing the Risks of the ‘Mozart Effect,’” 43.
21. Babel: A Reminder,” Arts Education Policy Review 101 (3): 13-14
22. U.S. Department of Education, et al., The Mars Millennium Project handbook, 1999,36-47.
23. Elliot Eisner, “Is the Artist in the School Program Effective?’ Art Education 27 (2): 19-23
24. Ralph A. Smith, “A Policy Analysis and Criticism of the Artists-in-Schools Program of the National Endowment for the Arts,” in Artist-in- Schools: Analysis and Criticism, ed. Ralph A. Smith (Urbana, Ill.: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign) 1978, 21-41
25. Laura H. Chapman, Instant Art, Instant Culture: The Unspoken Policy for American Schools (Teachers College Press: New York) 1982
26. Charles H. Ball, “Mutual Assistance or Mutual Debasement?’ Design, for Arts Education 87 (6): 2-4
27. David Pankratz, “Aesthetic Welfare, Government, and Educational Policy,” Design for Arts Education 87 (6): 12-24
28. Paul R. Lehman, “Winning and Losing in the Struggle to Reform Education,” Design job Arts in Education 93 (5): 2-12
29. Constance M. Bumgamer Gee, “Artists in the Classroom: The Impact and Consequences of the National Endowment for the Arts’ Artist Residency Program on K-12 Arts Education,” Arts Educution Policy Review 95 (3): 14-29
30. Frances Phillips, Grantmakers in the Arts 10 (2): 43.
31. USDOE, Community Update. “Federal Budget Affects Local Schools,” August 2000, no. 79, 2.
32. National Endowment for the Arts, “Did You Know. ?“, , April 1998.
33. William hey, National Art Education Association convention, Washington, D.C., 27 March 1999.
34. David Pankratz, Liora Bresler, Thomas Brewer, and Richard Colwell in “Symposium on Arts Education Research,” Arts Education Policy Review 99 (5)
35. Laura Chapman’s “A Century of Distancing Art from the Public,” Arts Education Policy Review, 101 (3): 27-28.
36. Mute Those Claims,.’ The Journal of Aesthetic Education, Fall Winter 2000.51, 57.
37. MENC, et al., K-12 Arts Education in the United States: Present Context, Future Needs, January 1986, 12.
38. “Learn About The NEA” Web page at http://arts.endow.gov/learn
39. John Harland et al., “The Effects and Effectiveness of Arts Education” (National Foundation for Educational Research, UK) 1999
40. Folkert Haanstra, “Arts Education and the Educational Careers of Dutch Students” (Unpublished document, University of Amsterdam, 1999).
41. Bennett Reimer, “Facing the Risks of the Mozart Effect,” Music Educators Journal, July 1999, 39
42. Questioning Arts Education in Action: The State Arts Agency Commitment,” Arts Education Policy Review 101 (3): 38.
43. Jeffrey Kimpton, “Looking Ahead from Past Experience,” Arts Education Policy Review 101 (3): 35.
44. C.S. Lewis, “Lilies That Fester,” The World’s Last Night and Other Essays (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1984).