Quality of partogram monitoring at a primary health centre in Zambia

Midwifery

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 191-196

  Fujita, Wakako ^a   Mukumbuta, Lubinda ^b   Chavuma, Roy ^c   Ohashi, Kazutomo ^d  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Railway Hospital Lusaka Palliatice Care Alliance Zambia   (Zambia)

^c UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Zambia)

^d OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Compliance; Monitoring of labour; Partogram; Quality; Zambia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIRTH; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 1; MEDICAL RECORD; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR; ZAMBIA;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; MEDICAL RECORDS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PARTURITION; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; ZAMBIA;

EID: 84920606050     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gans-Lartey F., O'Brien B.A., Gyekye F.O., Schopflocher D. The relationship between the use of the partograph and birth outcomes at Korle-Bu teaching hospital. Midwifery 2013, 29:461-467.
2. Hofmeyr G.J., Haws R.A., Bergstorm S., et al. Obstetric care in low-resource settings: what, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2009, 107:21-45.
3. Japanese Midwives Association, 2009. Guideline of Maternity Home. 2009 Revised edition (in Japanese).
4. Kasahara S., Ishii A., Numasaki H., et al. Implementation of time and motion study. Introduction to time and motion study in health care service. Jpn. J. Nurs. Res. 2004, 37:309-317. (in Japanese).
5. Kasahara S., Ohno Y., Ishii F., Numasaki H. Visualizing the impact of interruptions in nursing work flow using a time process study. IT Health Care 2010, 5:124-134.
6. Lavender, T., Hart, A., Smyth, R.M., 2012. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 8, CD005461.
7. Lundgren I., Andrén K., Nissen E., Berg M. Care seeking during the latent phase of labour - frequencies and birth outcomes in two delivery wards in Sweden. Sex. Reprod. Healthc. 2013, 4:141-146.
8. Mathai M. The partograph for the prevention of obstructed labor. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 52:256-269.
9. Nyamtema A.S., Urassa D.P., Massawe S., Massawe A., Lindmark G., van Roosmalen J. Partogram use in the Dar es Salaam perinatal care study. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2008, 100:37-40.
10. Ogwang S., Karyabakabo Z., Rutebemberwa E. Assessment of partogram use during labour in Rujumbura Health Sub District, Rukungiri District, Uganda. Afr. Health Sci. 2009, 9:27-34.
11. Rahnama P., Ziaei S., Faghihzadeh S. Impact of early admission in labor on method of delivery. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2006, 92:217-220.
12. The American College of Nurse-Midwives Intermittent auscultation for intrapartum fetal heart rate surveillance. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2010, 55:397-403.
13. World Health Organization World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. Lancet 1994, 343:1399-1404.
14. World Health Organization Midwifery education modules 2008, (Managing Prolonged and Obstructed Labour), WHO Press, Geneva, (last accessed 25 June 2014). http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/3_9241546662/en/index.html, 2nd edn.