Federally-assisted housing in conflict: Privatization or preservation?

A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 163-170

  Achtenberg, Emily Paradise ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920595175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Achtenberg, Emily P. 2002. Stemming the tide: A handbook on preserving subsidized multifamily housing. New York: Local Initiatives Support Corporation.
2. Bodaken, Michael. 1995. We must preserve the nation's supply of affordable housing. Shelterforce, July/August.
3. Dunlap, Helen M. 1995. Mark to market: A strategy to recapitalize HUD's assisted housing inventory. Shelterforce, July/August.
4. Foong, L. Keat. 1996. Market-rate bandwagon. Multihousing news, October/November.
5. Galle, Brian. 1999. Preserving federally-assisted housing at the state and local level: A legislative tool kit. Housing Law Bulletin, 29:183.
6. Grunwald, Michael. 1994. More HUD money flows to Boston landlords. Boston Globe, December 19.
7. Grunwald, Michael. 1995. Investors wary of HUD plan. Boston Globe, July 5.
8. Housing and Development Reporter. 1999. Decision of Iowa owners to terminate contracts raises concern for tenants. Current Developments, Vol. 26, No. 42, February 22.
9. Housing and Development Reporter. 2000. California, New York City opt out of mark-to-market program. Current Developments, Vol. 27, No. 30, January 10.
10. Housing and Development Reporter. 2003. Mark-to-market program has made progress, OMHAR director says. Current Developments, Vol. 31, No. CD-4, February 17.
11. NationalAssociationforHousingPartnershipsandRecapitalization Advisors, Inc. 1999. Mark to marke and non-profits: Results from the demonstration and implications for the permanent program. Boston: The Association.
12. National Housing Trust. n.d. Funded Title II and VI projects.Washington, DC: The Trust.
13. NationalAssociationforHousingPartnershipsandRecapitalization Advisors, Inc. 2001. Prepayment summary as of 12/31/98. May 7.Washington, DC: The Trust.
14. NationalAssociationforHousingPartnershipsandRecapitalization Advisors, Inc. 2002a. All mortgage prepayments by state as of 12/31/01. June 27.Washington, DC: The Trust.
15. NationalAssociationforHousingPartnershipsandRecapitalization Advisors, Inc. 2002b. All Section 8 optouts by state as of 7/31/01. June 27.Washington, DC: The Trust.
16. Office of Management and Budget. 1994. FY1996 Passback: Department of Housing and Urban Development, November 21.
17. Retsinas, Nicholas, P. 1995. Statement before theHousing, Banking, and Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, June 13.
18. Sard, Barbara, and Will Fischer. 2003.Housingvoucher block grant bills would jeopardize an effective program and likely lead to cuts in assistance for lowincome families. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, May 14.
19. U.S. Congress. 1990. Managers'Report (JointExplanatory Statement)-H.REP.No. 922, 101stCong. 2nd Sess., October 22.
20. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1994. Office of Inspector General, review of multifamily preservation programs. Office of Audit-Region X. Washington, DC, April 20.
21. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1995. Office of Inspector General, HUD's Multifamily Preservation Program. Office of Audit-New England. Washington, DC, July 14.
22. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1996a. Office of Housing, projects funded in FY96.Washington, DC, July 24.
23. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1996b. Office of Housing, preservation funding queue.Washington, DC, November 12.
24. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1997. 1997 preservation funding queue database.Washington, DC, December 10.
25. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1999a. Opting in: Renewing America's commitment to affordable housing. Washington, DC.
26. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1999b. Waiting in vain: An update on America's rental housing crisis.Washington, DC.
27. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2000. Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance Restructuring. Initiatives for M2M owners and purchasers.Washington, DC, September 11.
28. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2003a. Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance Restructuring. Mark-to-market pipeline summary report.Washington, DC, October 30.
29. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2003b. Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance Restructuring. PAE and assigned property status report.Washington, DC, October 31.
30. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2003c. Fiscal year 2004 budget:Congressional justifications for estimates.Washington, DC.
31. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1997. Housing preservation: Policies and administrative problems increase costs and hinder program operations. GAO/RCED 97-169, Appendix VIII, July.